一名年轻女性的松果体区域出现肿块。

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pathology Pub Date : 2024-03-25 DOI:10.1111/bpa.13258
Lorraina J. Robinson, Eric Goold, David Anderson, Robert C. Rennert, William T. Couldwell, Changhong Xing
{"title":"一名年轻女性的松果体区域出现肿块。","authors":"Lorraina J. Robinson,&nbsp;Eric Goold,&nbsp;David Anderson,&nbsp;Robert C. Rennert,&nbsp;William T. Couldwell,&nbsp;Changhong Xing","doi":"10.1111/bpa.13258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This case involves an 18-year-old female with no significant past medical history who was found to have a large pineal and third ventricular tumor with obstructive hydrocephalus after experiencing subacute, progressive headaches, and an acute episode of sudden vision loss. She underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt at an outside facility with improvement in her vision before presenting as a transfer to our facility. Brain magnetic resonance imaging upon transfer demonstrated a large, heterogenous enhancing mass (6.6 × 6.1 × 5.7 cm) centered in the pineal region with extension into the third and right lateral ventricles (Figure 1). The tumor exerted mass effect by splaying the bilateral thalami with effacement of the basal cisterna, effacement of the cerebral aqueduct, and an 8 mm tonsillar herniation. Surgery was pursued for a definitive diagnosis and tumor debulking. Intraoperatively, the tumor demonstrated variable soft and firm consistency with moderate vascularity. Post-operative imaging did not demonstrate clear residual tumor. She was discharged with no new neurologic deficits.</p><p>Histology of H&amp;E-stained sections demonstrated a moderately hypercellular neoplasm consisting of an admixture of small to medium-sized spindle cells embedded in a heavily collagenized and myxoid matrix (Box 1, Figure 2A, B). Tumor cells were observed forming disorganized, haphazard architectural patterns while some tumor cells were seen floating in a loose basophilic myxoid matrix (Figure 2A). The mitotic index was &lt;1/10 high-power-fields. Necrosis was absent. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were patchy positive for CD163 (Figure 2C) and CD99 (Figure 2D), focally positive for desmin (Figure 2D inset), and negative for GFAP, OLIG2, CD34, and SSTR2. MIB-1 proliferation index was overall low (1%–2%) (Figure 2E) but focally increased at approximately 10% (Figure 2E inset). Immunostaining for SMARCB1 showed loss of expression in many of the tumor cells (Figure 2F).</p><p>NeoTYPE brain tumor profile (DNA and RNA) from NeoGenomics was performed, and no pathogenic mutations or fusions were detected. However, a variant of unknown clinical significance involving the <i>SMARCB1</i> gene c.91G&gt;A (p.Glu31Lys) E31K NM_003073.5:c.91G&gt;A was detected. Whole genome methylation profiling was performed at the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) for confirmation of the diagnosis. The composite NIH/NCI methylation profile classified the tumor with a high confidence score (0.99) as a desmoplastic myxoid tumor, <i>SMARCB1</i>-altered.</p><p>Desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT) of the pineal region, <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutant.</p><p>As defined by the most recent 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System tumor classification, DMT of the pineal region, <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutant, maintains a unique <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutation while histologically displaying desmoplasia and myxoid changes but lacking histopathological signs of malignancy. A recent study by Thomas et al. helped to identify the clinical, histopathological, and molecular characterization involving seven cases of this uncommon tumor [<span>1</span>]. Available demographic data from all prior cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and the present case indicate a slight female predominance (F: 7; M: 4) and an average age of onset of 34.9 years (range 15–61 years old). All cases have been in the pineal region. Currently, the etiology, pathogenesis, and cell origin of this tumor are unknown. Due to the rarity of this tumor, prognostic and predictive clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Overall, the biological behavior of DMTs with a <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutation appears to be less aggressive than their closely related atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor counterparts.</p><p>Histologically, the present case showed the classical morphology observed in this tumor. However, the present case had several features that were not yet described in the previous reports of DMTs. First, the present case had unique immunohistochemical profiles. The present tumor was negative for CD34 and positive for CD163 and CD99, whereas CD34 staining was positive in other reported cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and CD163 and CD99 positivity had not been previously reported. The morphology and immunoprofiles of this tumor raise the differential consideration of intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET::CREB fusion-positive. No fusion was detected on both <i>EWSR1</i> and <i>FUS</i> genes by NeoGenomics brain tumor panel, which excluded this diagnosis. Second, the present case had a novel genetic finding: a missense mutation of <i>SMARCB1</i>, which was not reported in previous studies. In previous reported DMTs [<span>1-3</span>], <i>SMARCB1</i> was mainly inactivated by homozygous or heterozygous deletions or indels rather than point mutations. <i>SMARCB1</i> E31K lies within the DNA-binding region of the SMARCB1 protein (UniProt.org). The reported pathogenic mutations in this amino acid of <i>SMARCB1</i> gene include c.91G&gt;T (p.Glu31Ter) E31* and c.92A&gt;T (p.Glu31Val) E31V. E31K has been identified in sequencing studies (PMID: 33845210, PMID: 37649695), but has not been biochemically characterized, and therefore, its effect on SMARCB1 protein function is unknown.</p><p><i>Clinical data collection</i>: LR, EG, DA, RR, WC, and CX. <i>Figure and manuscript text</i> preparation: LR, RR, EG, DA, and CX. <i>Study supervision</i>: CX. All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p>","PeriodicalId":9290,"journal":{"name":"Brain Pathology","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bpa.13258","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A mass in the pineal region of a young woman\",\"authors\":\"Lorraina J. Robinson,&nbsp;Eric Goold,&nbsp;David Anderson,&nbsp;Robert C. Rennert,&nbsp;William T. Couldwell,&nbsp;Changhong Xing\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bpa.13258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This case involves an 18-year-old female with no significant past medical history who was found to have a large pineal and third ventricular tumor with obstructive hydrocephalus after experiencing subacute, progressive headaches, and an acute episode of sudden vision loss. She underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt at an outside facility with improvement in her vision before presenting as a transfer to our facility. Brain magnetic resonance imaging upon transfer demonstrated a large, heterogenous enhancing mass (6.6 × 6.1 × 5.7 cm) centered in the pineal region with extension into the third and right lateral ventricles (Figure 1). The tumor exerted mass effect by splaying the bilateral thalami with effacement of the basal cisterna, effacement of the cerebral aqueduct, and an 8 mm tonsillar herniation. Surgery was pursued for a definitive diagnosis and tumor debulking. Intraoperatively, the tumor demonstrated variable soft and firm consistency with moderate vascularity. Post-operative imaging did not demonstrate clear residual tumor. She was discharged with no new neurologic deficits.</p><p>Histology of H&amp;E-stained sections demonstrated a moderately hypercellular neoplasm consisting of an admixture of small to medium-sized spindle cells embedded in a heavily collagenized and myxoid matrix (Box 1, Figure 2A, B). Tumor cells were observed forming disorganized, haphazard architectural patterns while some tumor cells were seen floating in a loose basophilic myxoid matrix (Figure 2A). The mitotic index was &lt;1/10 high-power-fields. Necrosis was absent. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were patchy positive for CD163 (Figure 2C) and CD99 (Figure 2D), focally positive for desmin (Figure 2D inset), and negative for GFAP, OLIG2, CD34, and SSTR2. MIB-1 proliferation index was overall low (1%–2%) (Figure 2E) but focally increased at approximately 10% (Figure 2E inset). Immunostaining for SMARCB1 showed loss of expression in many of the tumor cells (Figure 2F).</p><p>NeoTYPE brain tumor profile (DNA and RNA) from NeoGenomics was performed, and no pathogenic mutations or fusions were detected. However, a variant of unknown clinical significance involving the <i>SMARCB1</i> gene c.91G&gt;A (p.Glu31Lys) E31K NM_003073.5:c.91G&gt;A was detected. Whole genome methylation profiling was performed at the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) for confirmation of the diagnosis. The composite NIH/NCI methylation profile classified the tumor with a high confidence score (0.99) as a desmoplastic myxoid tumor, <i>SMARCB1</i>-altered.</p><p>Desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT) of the pineal region, <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutant.</p><p>As defined by the most recent 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System tumor classification, DMT of the pineal region, <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutant, maintains a unique <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutation while histologically displaying desmoplasia and myxoid changes but lacking histopathological signs of malignancy. A recent study by Thomas et al. helped to identify the clinical, histopathological, and molecular characterization involving seven cases of this uncommon tumor [<span>1</span>]. Available demographic data from all prior cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and the present case indicate a slight female predominance (F: 7; M: 4) and an average age of onset of 34.9 years (range 15–61 years old). All cases have been in the pineal region. Currently, the etiology, pathogenesis, and cell origin of this tumor are unknown. Due to the rarity of this tumor, prognostic and predictive clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Overall, the biological behavior of DMTs with a <i>SMARCB1</i>-mutation appears to be less aggressive than their closely related atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor counterparts.</p><p>Histologically, the present case showed the classical morphology observed in this tumor. However, the present case had several features that were not yet described in the previous reports of DMTs. First, the present case had unique immunohistochemical profiles. The present tumor was negative for CD34 and positive for CD163 and CD99, whereas CD34 staining was positive in other reported cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and CD163 and CD99 positivity had not been previously reported. The morphology and immunoprofiles of this tumor raise the differential consideration of intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET::CREB fusion-positive. No fusion was detected on both <i>EWSR1</i> and <i>FUS</i> genes by NeoGenomics brain tumor panel, which excluded this diagnosis. Second, the present case had a novel genetic finding: a missense mutation of <i>SMARCB1</i>, which was not reported in previous studies. In previous reported DMTs [<span>1-3</span>], <i>SMARCB1</i> was mainly inactivated by homozygous or heterozygous deletions or indels rather than point mutations. <i>SMARCB1</i> E31K lies within the DNA-binding region of the SMARCB1 protein (UniProt.org). The reported pathogenic mutations in this amino acid of <i>SMARCB1</i> gene include c.91G&gt;T (p.Glu31Ter) E31* and c.92A&gt;T (p.Glu31Val) E31V. E31K has been identified in sequencing studies (PMID: 33845210, PMID: 37649695), but has not been biochemically characterized, and therefore, its effect on SMARCB1 protein function is unknown.</p><p><i>Clinical data collection</i>: LR, EG, DA, RR, WC, and CX. <i>Figure and manuscript text</i> preparation: LR, RR, EG, DA, and CX. <i>Study supervision</i>: CX. All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Pathology\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bpa.13258\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bpa.13258\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bpa.13258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

E31K已在测序研究中发现(PMID:33845210,PMID:37649695),但尚未进行生化鉴定,因此其对SMARCB1蛋白功能的影响尚不清楚:临床数据收集:LR、EG、DA、RR、WC 和 CX。图表和手稿文本准备:LR、RR、EG、DA、RR、WC 和 CX:临床数据收集:LR、EG、DA、RR、WC 和 CX。研究监督:CX:CX。所有作者均对研究构思或数据的获取、分析或解释做出了重要贡献。所有作者均审阅并批准了最终手稿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A mass in the pineal region of a young woman

This case involves an 18-year-old female with no significant past medical history who was found to have a large pineal and third ventricular tumor with obstructive hydrocephalus after experiencing subacute, progressive headaches, and an acute episode of sudden vision loss. She underwent a ventriculoperitoneal shunt at an outside facility with improvement in her vision before presenting as a transfer to our facility. Brain magnetic resonance imaging upon transfer demonstrated a large, heterogenous enhancing mass (6.6 × 6.1 × 5.7 cm) centered in the pineal region with extension into the third and right lateral ventricles (Figure 1). The tumor exerted mass effect by splaying the bilateral thalami with effacement of the basal cisterna, effacement of the cerebral aqueduct, and an 8 mm tonsillar herniation. Surgery was pursued for a definitive diagnosis and tumor debulking. Intraoperatively, the tumor demonstrated variable soft and firm consistency with moderate vascularity. Post-operative imaging did not demonstrate clear residual tumor. She was discharged with no new neurologic deficits.

Histology of H&E-stained sections demonstrated a moderately hypercellular neoplasm consisting of an admixture of small to medium-sized spindle cells embedded in a heavily collagenized and myxoid matrix (Box 1, Figure 2A, B). Tumor cells were observed forming disorganized, haphazard architectural patterns while some tumor cells were seen floating in a loose basophilic myxoid matrix (Figure 2A). The mitotic index was <1/10 high-power-fields. Necrosis was absent. By immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were patchy positive for CD163 (Figure 2C) and CD99 (Figure 2D), focally positive for desmin (Figure 2D inset), and negative for GFAP, OLIG2, CD34, and SSTR2. MIB-1 proliferation index was overall low (1%–2%) (Figure 2E) but focally increased at approximately 10% (Figure 2E inset). Immunostaining for SMARCB1 showed loss of expression in many of the tumor cells (Figure 2F).

NeoTYPE brain tumor profile (DNA and RNA) from NeoGenomics was performed, and no pathogenic mutations or fusions were detected. However, a variant of unknown clinical significance involving the SMARCB1 gene c.91G>A (p.Glu31Lys) E31K NM_003073.5:c.91G>A was detected. Whole genome methylation profiling was performed at the National Institute of Health (NIH)/National Cancer Institute (NCI) for confirmation of the diagnosis. The composite NIH/NCI methylation profile classified the tumor with a high confidence score (0.99) as a desmoplastic myxoid tumor, SMARCB1-altered.

Desmoplastic myxoid tumor (DMT) of the pineal region, SMARCB1-mutant.

As defined by the most recent 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) Central Nervous System tumor classification, DMT of the pineal region, SMARCB1-mutant, maintains a unique SMARCB1-mutation while histologically displaying desmoplasia and myxoid changes but lacking histopathological signs of malignancy. A recent study by Thomas et al. helped to identify the clinical, histopathological, and molecular characterization involving seven cases of this uncommon tumor [1]. Available demographic data from all prior cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and the present case indicate a slight female predominance (F: 7; M: 4) and an average age of onset of 34.9 years (range 15–61 years old). All cases have been in the pineal region. Currently, the etiology, pathogenesis, and cell origin of this tumor are unknown. Due to the rarity of this tumor, prognostic and predictive clinical outcomes are still uncertain. Overall, the biological behavior of DMTs with a SMARCB1-mutation appears to be less aggressive than their closely related atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor counterparts.

Histologically, the present case showed the classical morphology observed in this tumor. However, the present case had several features that were not yet described in the previous reports of DMTs. First, the present case had unique immunohistochemical profiles. The present tumor was negative for CD34 and positive for CD163 and CD99, whereas CD34 staining was positive in other reported cases [1–3; PMID: 32901946] and CD163 and CD99 positivity had not been previously reported. The morphology and immunoprofiles of this tumor raise the differential consideration of intracranial mesenchymal tumor, FET::CREB fusion-positive. No fusion was detected on both EWSR1 and FUS genes by NeoGenomics brain tumor panel, which excluded this diagnosis. Second, the present case had a novel genetic finding: a missense mutation of SMARCB1, which was not reported in previous studies. In previous reported DMTs [1-3], SMARCB1 was mainly inactivated by homozygous or heterozygous deletions or indels rather than point mutations. SMARCB1 E31K lies within the DNA-binding region of the SMARCB1 protein (UniProt.org). The reported pathogenic mutations in this amino acid of SMARCB1 gene include c.91G>T (p.Glu31Ter) E31* and c.92A>T (p.Glu31Val) E31V. E31K has been identified in sequencing studies (PMID: 33845210, PMID: 37649695), but has not been biochemically characterized, and therefore, its effect on SMARCB1 protein function is unknown.

Clinical data collection: LR, EG, DA, RR, WC, and CX. Figure and manuscript text preparation: LR, RR, EG, DA, and CX. Study supervision: CX. All authors made substantial contributions to the conception or to the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Pathology
Brain Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Pathology is the journal of choice for biomedical scientists investigating diseases of the nervous system. The official journal of the International Society of Neuropathology, Brain Pathology is a peer-reviewed quarterly publication that includes original research, review articles and symposia focuses on the pathogenesis of neurological disease.
期刊最新文献
A broader outlook is required to stage and classify pituitary neoplasms for patient care. Clinico-sero-pathological characteristics of anti-Ha antisynthetase syndrome. The prevalence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a historical epilepsy post-mortem collection. Altered immune response is associated with sex difference in vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease in human prefrontal cortex. A pineal region mass in a 55-year-old female.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1