砂拉越政府药房员工的心理健康及其相关因素。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2327221
Shing Chyi Loo, Chuo Yew Ting, Luqman Nulhakim Said, Nurhidayati Binti Mohamad, Abu Hassan Alshaari Bin Abd Jabar
{"title":"砂拉越政府药房员工的心理健康及其相关因素。","authors":"Shing Chyi Loo, Chuo Yew Ting, Luqman Nulhakim Said, Nurhidayati Binti Mohamad, Abu Hassan Alshaari Bin Abd Jabar","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2327221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. Studies have highlighted that healthcare workers are exposed to various forms of psychological distress. This study aimed to assess the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associating factors. <i>Methods</i>. The cross-sectional study explored the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. An adopted questionnaire was employed to collect quantitative data from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021. <i>Results</i>. A total of 515 respondents were recruited. Those who perceived good health status were 1.9 times more likely to have normal depression scores (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.53; <i>B</i> = -0.64), and 2.4 times (RRR = 0.41; <i>B</i> = -0.88) more likely to have normal stress scores. Those who were greatly affected by COVID-19 in their work were found to be 1.2 times (RRR = 1.20; <i>B</i> = 0.18) more likely to have moderate anxiety scores and 1.44 times (RRR = 1.44; <i>B</i> = 0.36) more likely to have severe depression scores. Respondents with higher work characteristic scores were more likely to have normal depression, stress and anxiety scores. <i>Conclusions</i>. Good health status perception and work characteristics appeared to be the factors affecting respondents' scores in all dimensions of psychological well-being. Hence, improving both domains will be key in improving overall psychological well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"704-710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological well-being among government pharmacy staff in Sarawak and the associating factors.\",\"authors\":\"Shing Chyi Loo, Chuo Yew Ting, Luqman Nulhakim Said, Nurhidayati Binti Mohamad, Abu Hassan Alshaari Bin Abd Jabar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2024.2327221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives</i>. Studies have highlighted that healthcare workers are exposed to various forms of psychological distress. This study aimed to assess the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associating factors. <i>Methods</i>. The cross-sectional study explored the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. An adopted questionnaire was employed to collect quantitative data from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021. <i>Results</i>. A total of 515 respondents were recruited. Those who perceived good health status were 1.9 times more likely to have normal depression scores (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.53; <i>B</i> = -0.64), and 2.4 times (RRR = 0.41; <i>B</i> = -0.88) more likely to have normal stress scores. Those who were greatly affected by COVID-19 in their work were found to be 1.2 times (RRR = 1.20; <i>B</i> = 0.18) more likely to have moderate anxiety scores and 1.44 times (RRR = 1.44; <i>B</i> = 0.36) more likely to have severe depression scores. Respondents with higher work characteristic scores were more likely to have normal depression, stress and anxiety scores. <i>Conclusions</i>. Good health status perception and work characteristics appeared to be the factors affecting respondents' scores in all dimensions of psychological well-being. Hence, improving both domains will be key in improving overall psychological well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"704-710\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2327221\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2327221","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的。研究表明,医护人员面临着各种形式的心理困扰。本研究旨在评估药房工作人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康状况及其相关因素。研究方法这项横断面研究探讨了药房工作人员在 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康情况。采用问卷调查法收集 2021 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 6 月 30 日期间的定量数据。结果。共招募了 515 名受访者。健康状况良好者抑郁评分正常的几率是健康状况不良者的 1.9 倍(相对风险比 [RRR] = 0.53;B = -0.64),压力评分正常的几率是健康状况不良者的 2.4 倍(相对风险比 = 0.41;B = -0.88)。那些在工作中受到 COVID-19 严重影响的受访者,其中度焦虑得分的可能性要高出 1.2 倍(RRR = 1.20;B = 0.18),而其重度抑郁得分的可能性要高出 1.44 倍(RRR = 1.44;B = 0.36)。工作特征得分较高的受访者更有可能拥有正常的抑郁、压力和焦虑得分。结论良好的健康状况感知和工作特征似乎是影响受访者在所有心理健康维度得分的因素。因此,改善这两个方面将是提高整体心理健康水平的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychological well-being among government pharmacy staff in Sarawak and the associating factors.

Objectives. Studies have highlighted that healthcare workers are exposed to various forms of psychological distress. This study aimed to assess the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and the associating factors. Methods. The cross-sectional study explored the psychological well-being of pharmacy staff during the COVID-19 pandemic. An adopted questionnaire was employed to collect quantitative data from January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021. Results. A total of 515 respondents were recruited. Those who perceived good health status were 1.9 times more likely to have normal depression scores (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 0.53; B = -0.64), and 2.4 times (RRR = 0.41; B = -0.88) more likely to have normal stress scores. Those who were greatly affected by COVID-19 in their work were found to be 1.2 times (RRR = 1.20; B = 0.18) more likely to have moderate anxiety scores and 1.44 times (RRR = 1.44; B = 0.36) more likely to have severe depression scores. Respondents with higher work characteristic scores were more likely to have normal depression, stress and anxiety scores. Conclusions. Good health status perception and work characteristics appeared to be the factors affecting respondents' scores in all dimensions of psychological well-being. Hence, improving both domains will be key in improving overall psychological well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1