经皮股骨入路:导丝卡住,因缠绕和打结而造成解管困难。

Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Binita Dholakia, Ashfaque Khan, Chirag Hirani, Satheesh Kumar, Dibya Jyoti Mahakul, Abhishek Katyal, Wajid Nazir, Daljit Singh
{"title":"经皮股骨入路:导丝卡住,因缠绕和打结而造成解管困难。","authors":"Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Binita Dholakia, Ashfaque Khan, Chirag Hirani, Satheesh Kumar, Dibya Jyoti Mahakul, Abhishek Katyal, Wajid Nazir, Daljit Singh","doi":"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Percutaneous techniques for femoral arterial access are increasingly being performed due to advances in endovascular cerebral procedures, as they provide a less morbid and minimally invasive approach than open procedures. Common complications associated with this peripheral puncture include hematoma, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, retroperitoneal bleeding, inadvertent venous puncture, dissection, etc. The retrograde femoral access is currently the most frequently used arterial access as it is technically straightforward, allows for the use of larger size sheaths and catheters, allows repeated attempts, etc. Although being technically less challenging, grave complications can occur due to hardware failure. Here, we present a case of unruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm, who underwent uneventful diagnostic cerebral digital substraction angiography (DSA) via right femoral artery route on first attempt, but on second attempt for therapeutic intervention, landed up with stuck guide wire and faced decannulation difficulty due to unravelling of guide wire and multiple knot formation, which was finally removed after multiple attempts at pulling and improvised manoeuvres. Such cannulation and decannulation difficulties have been reported multiple times for central venous access, but extremely rarely for femoral routes, making this case a rarity and worth reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":94072,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"223-226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220304/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percutaneous femoral access: Stuck guide wire, decannulation difficulty due to unravelling and knotting.\",\"authors\":\"Bhanu Pratap Singh Chauhan, Binita Dholakia, Ashfaque Khan, Chirag Hirani, Satheesh Kumar, Dibya Jyoti Mahakul, Abhishek Katyal, Wajid Nazir, Daljit Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Percutaneous techniques for femoral arterial access are increasingly being performed due to advances in endovascular cerebral procedures, as they provide a less morbid and minimally invasive approach than open procedures. Common complications associated with this peripheral puncture include hematoma, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, retroperitoneal bleeding, inadvertent venous puncture, dissection, etc. The retrograde femoral access is currently the most frequently used arterial access as it is technically straightforward, allows for the use of larger size sheaths and catheters, allows repeated attempts, etc. Although being technically less challenging, grave complications can occur due to hardware failure. Here, we present a case of unruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm, who underwent uneventful diagnostic cerebral digital substraction angiography (DSA) via right femoral artery route on first attempt, but on second attempt for therapeutic intervention, landed up with stuck guide wire and faced decannulation difficulty due to unravelling of guide wire and multiple knot formation, which was finally removed after multiple attempts at pulling and improvised manoeuvres. Such cannulation and decannulation difficulties have been reported multiple times for central venous access, but extremely rarely for femoral routes, making this case a rarity and worth reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"223-226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11220304/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.06.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.06.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于脑血管内手术的发展,经皮股动脉入路技术越来越多地应用于脑血管内手术,因为与开放手术相比,经皮股动脉入路技术是一种发病率较低的微创方法。这种外周穿刺的常见并发症包括血肿、出血、假性动脉瘤、动静脉瘘、腹膜后出血、静脉穿刺不慎、夹层等。逆行股动脉入路是目前最常用的动脉入路,因为它在技术上简单易行,可以使用更大尺寸的鞘管和导管,允许反复尝试等。虽然技术难度较低,但由于硬件故障,可能会出现严重的并发症。在此,我们介绍了一例未破裂的小脑后下动脉(PICA)动脉瘤患者,该患者第一次尝试通过右股动脉途径顺利进行了脑数字减影血管造影(DSA)诊断,但在第二次尝试进行治疗干预时,导丝被卡住,并且由于导丝松开和多个结的形成而面临解封困难。此类插管和拔管困难在中心静脉通路中已有多次报道,但在股动脉通路中却极为罕见,因此本病例非常罕见,值得报道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Percutaneous femoral access: Stuck guide wire, decannulation difficulty due to unravelling and knotting.

Percutaneous techniques for femoral arterial access are increasingly being performed due to advances in endovascular cerebral procedures, as they provide a less morbid and minimally invasive approach than open procedures. Common complications associated with this peripheral puncture include hematoma, bleeding, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula, retroperitoneal bleeding, inadvertent venous puncture, dissection, etc. The retrograde femoral access is currently the most frequently used arterial access as it is technically straightforward, allows for the use of larger size sheaths and catheters, allows repeated attempts, etc. Although being technically less challenging, grave complications can occur due to hardware failure. Here, we present a case of unruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysm, who underwent uneventful diagnostic cerebral digital substraction angiography (DSA) via right femoral artery route on first attempt, but on second attempt for therapeutic intervention, landed up with stuck guide wire and faced decannulation difficulty due to unravelling of guide wire and multiple knot formation, which was finally removed after multiple attempts at pulling and improvised manoeuvres. Such cannulation and decannulation difficulties have been reported multiple times for central venous access, but extremely rarely for femoral routes, making this case a rarity and worth reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
"Picket fence" an alternative clipping technique for wide necked and large aneurysms: technical nuances in a case series. The natural history of cerebral infundibula: A retrospective cohort study. Safety and effectiveness of Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Multiple AVM with separate nidi, a case report and review the literatures. Radial artery access with a sheathless 0.087" inner diameter balloon guide catheter (Walrus) for neurointerventional procedures: Technique and clinical outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1