对普通病房住院病人实施改良预警系统和快速反应小组的效果。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Systems Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1007/s10916-024-02046-2
Wen-Jinn Liaw, Tzu-Jung Wu, Li-Hua Huang, Chiao-Shan Chen, Ming-Che Tsai, I-Chen Lin, Yi-Han Liao, Wei-Chih Shen
{"title":"对普通病房住院病人实施改良预警系统和快速反应小组的效果。","authors":"Wen-Jinn Liaw, Tzu-Jung Wu, Li-Hua Huang, Chiao-Shan Chen, Ming-Che Tsai, I-Chen Lin, Yi-Han Liao, Wei-Chih Shen","doi":"10.1007/s10916-024-02046-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness and impact of implementing a Modified Early Warning System (MEWS) and Rapid Response Team (RRT) for inpatients admitted to the general ward (GW) of a medical center. This study included all inpatients who stayed in GWs from Jan. 2017 to Feb. 2022. We divided inpatients into GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and GW<sub>MEWS</sub> groups according to MEWS and RRT implementation in Aug. 2019. The primary outcome, unexpected deterioration, was defined by unplanned admission to intensive care units. We defined the detection performance and effectiveness of MEWS according to if a warning occurred within 24 h before the unplanned ICU admission. There were 129,039 inpatients included in this study, comprising 58,106 GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and 71,023 GW<sub>MEWS</sub>. The numbers of inpatients who underwent an unplanned ICU admission in GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and GW<sub>MEWS</sub> were 488 (.84%) and 468 (.66%), respectively, indicating that the implementation significantly reduced unexpected deterioration (p < .0001). Besides, 1,551,525 times MEWS assessments were executed for the GW<sub>MEWS</sub>. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value of the MEWS were 29.9%, 98.7%, 7.09%, and 99.76%, respectively. A total of 1,568 warning signs accurately occurred within the 24 h before an unplanned ICU admission. Among them, 428 (27.3%) met the criteria for automatically calling RRT, and 1,140 signs necessitated the nursing staff to decide if they needed to call RRT. Implementing MEWS and RRT increases nursing staff's monitoring and interventions and reduces unplanned ICU admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"48 1","pages":"35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Implementing Modified Early Warning System and Rapid Response Team for General Ward Inpatients.\",\"authors\":\"Wen-Jinn Liaw, Tzu-Jung Wu, Li-Hua Huang, Chiao-Shan Chen, Ming-Che Tsai, I-Chen Lin, Yi-Han Liao, Wei-Chih Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-024-02046-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness and impact of implementing a Modified Early Warning System (MEWS) and Rapid Response Team (RRT) for inpatients admitted to the general ward (GW) of a medical center. This study included all inpatients who stayed in GWs from Jan. 2017 to Feb. 2022. We divided inpatients into GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and GW<sub>MEWS</sub> groups according to MEWS and RRT implementation in Aug. 2019. The primary outcome, unexpected deterioration, was defined by unplanned admission to intensive care units. We defined the detection performance and effectiveness of MEWS according to if a warning occurred within 24 h before the unplanned ICU admission. There were 129,039 inpatients included in this study, comprising 58,106 GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and 71,023 GW<sub>MEWS</sub>. The numbers of inpatients who underwent an unplanned ICU admission in GW<sub>non-MEWS</sub> and GW<sub>MEWS</sub> were 488 (.84%) and 468 (.66%), respectively, indicating that the implementation significantly reduced unexpected deterioration (p < .0001). Besides, 1,551,525 times MEWS assessments were executed for the GW<sub>MEWS</sub>. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value of the MEWS were 29.9%, 98.7%, 7.09%, and 99.76%, respectively. A total of 1,568 warning signs accurately occurred within the 24 h before an unplanned ICU admission. Among them, 428 (27.3%) met the criteria for automatically calling RRT, and 1,140 signs necessitated the nursing staff to decide if they needed to call RRT. Implementing MEWS and RRT increases nursing staff's monitoring and interventions and reduces unplanned ICU admissions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02046-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02046-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项回顾性研究评估了对某医疗中心普通病房(GW)住院患者实施改良预警系统(MEWS)和快速反应小组(RRT)的效果和影响。本研究包括2017年1月至2022年2月期间入住普通病房的所有住院患者。根据2019年8月MEWS和RRT的实施情况,我们将住院患者分为GWnon-MEWS组和GWMEWS组。主要结果是意外恶化,即非计划性入住重症监护病房。我们根据非计划入住重症监护病房前24小时内是否发出警告来定义MEWS的检测性能和有效性。本研究共纳入了 129039 名住院患者,其中 58106 名 GWnon-MEWS,71023 名 GWMEWS。在普通病房和非普通病房中,分别有 488 名(0.84%)和 468 名(0.66%)住院病人经历了非计划的 ICU 入院,这表明实施普通病房和非普通病房可显著减少意外病情恶化(p < .0001)。此外,GWMEWS 共执行了 1,551,525 次 MEWS 评估。MEWS 的灵敏度、特异性、正预测值和负预测值分别为 29.9%、98.7%、7.09% 和 99.76%。在非计划入住重症监护室前的 24 小时内,共有 1,568 个预警信号准确出现。其中,428 个(27.3%)符合自动呼叫 RRT 的标准,1140 个征兆需要护理人员决定是否需要呼叫 RRT。实施 MEWS 和 RRT 可提高护理人员的监测和干预能力,减少非计划的 ICU 入院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectiveness of Implementing Modified Early Warning System and Rapid Response Team for General Ward Inpatients.

This retrospective study assessed the effectiveness and impact of implementing a Modified Early Warning System (MEWS) and Rapid Response Team (RRT) for inpatients admitted to the general ward (GW) of a medical center. This study included all inpatients who stayed in GWs from Jan. 2017 to Feb. 2022. We divided inpatients into GWnon-MEWS and GWMEWS groups according to MEWS and RRT implementation in Aug. 2019. The primary outcome, unexpected deterioration, was defined by unplanned admission to intensive care units. We defined the detection performance and effectiveness of MEWS according to if a warning occurred within 24 h before the unplanned ICU admission. There were 129,039 inpatients included in this study, comprising 58,106 GWnon-MEWS and 71,023 GWMEWS. The numbers of inpatients who underwent an unplanned ICU admission in GWnon-MEWS and GWMEWS were 488 (.84%) and 468 (.66%), respectively, indicating that the implementation significantly reduced unexpected deterioration (p < .0001). Besides, 1,551,525 times MEWS assessments were executed for the GWMEWS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predicted value, and negative predicted value of the MEWS were 29.9%, 98.7%, 7.09%, and 99.76%, respectively. A total of 1,568 warning signs accurately occurred within the 24 h before an unplanned ICU admission. Among them, 428 (27.3%) met the criteria for automatically calling RRT, and 1,140 signs necessitated the nursing staff to decide if they needed to call RRT. Implementing MEWS and RRT increases nursing staff's monitoring and interventions and reduces unplanned ICU admissions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
期刊最新文献
Garbage In, Garbage Out? Negative Impact of Physiological Waveform Artifacts in a Hospital Clinical Data Warehouse. 21st Century Cures Act and Information Blocking: How Have Different Specialties Responded? Self-Supervised Learning for Near-Wild Cognitive Workload Estimation. Electronic Health Records Sharing Based on Consortium Blockchain. Large Language Models in Healthcare: An Urgent Call for Ongoing, Rigorous Validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1