评估类风湿性关节炎患者观看 YouTube® 运动视频的可靠性和质量。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753
Fulden Sari, Zilan Bazancir Apaydin, Süleyman Sari
{"title":"评估类风湿性关节炎患者观看 YouTube® 运动视频的可靠性和质量。","authors":"Fulden Sari, Zilan Bazancir Apaydin, Süleyman Sari","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>YouTube<sub>®</sub>, one of the busiest video-sharing platforms, may lack sufficient or accurate information on health information and practices given the absence of a rigorous evaluation process.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the reliability of information and quality of exercise videos on YouTube<sub>®</sub> for rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video features and the source of the upload were sorted. Reliability of the information shared in the videos was evaluated using the mDISCERN too, and quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale and JAMA scoring system. Videos were independently analyzed by two physiotherapists specialized in rheumatologic rehabilitation. Any bias was resolved by an independent third assessor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-four exercise videos were included. A hundred and twenty-six (94%) of the 134 exercise videos were found to be useful, and 8 (6%) were misleading. The useful and misleading videos had similar numbers of views, likes, comments, and subscribers (<i>p</i> > .05), while video duration and time since upload were higher for useful videos (<i>p</i> < .05). Cohen's Kappa scores demonstrated that the level of agreement between the assessors were moderate (mDISCERN = 0.417, Global Quality Scale = 0.582, and JAMA = 0.555). There was a significant difference in JAMA scores (<i>p</i> = .013) between the sources of the videos. However, no significant difference was found in mDISCERN (<i>p</i> = .104) and Global Quality Scale (<i>p</i> = .128) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube<sub>®</sub> exercise videos provide partially reliable and moderate-quality information for people with rheumatoid arthritis. However, patients should be cautious and not rely directly on YouTube<sub>®</sub> exercise videos. Instead, they should consult a physician or physical therapist for exercises.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"362-369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of reliability and quality of YouTube® exercise videos in people with rheumatoid arthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Fulden Sari, Zilan Bazancir Apaydin, Süleyman Sari\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>YouTube<sub>®</sub>, one of the busiest video-sharing platforms, may lack sufficient or accurate information on health information and practices given the absence of a rigorous evaluation process.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the reliability of information and quality of exercise videos on YouTube<sub>®</sub> for rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Video features and the source of the upload were sorted. Reliability of the information shared in the videos was evaluated using the mDISCERN too, and quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale and JAMA scoring system. Videos were independently analyzed by two physiotherapists specialized in rheumatologic rehabilitation. Any bias was resolved by an independent third assessor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-four exercise videos were included. A hundred and twenty-six (94%) of the 134 exercise videos were found to be useful, and 8 (6%) were misleading. The useful and misleading videos had similar numbers of views, likes, comments, and subscribers (<i>p</i> > .05), while video duration and time since upload were higher for useful videos (<i>p</i> < .05). Cohen's Kappa scores demonstrated that the level of agreement between the assessors were moderate (mDISCERN = 0.417, Global Quality Scale = 0.582, and JAMA = 0.555). There was a significant difference in JAMA scores (<i>p</i> = .013) between the sources of the videos. However, no significant difference was found in mDISCERN (<i>p</i> = .104) and Global Quality Scale (<i>p</i> = .128) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>YouTube<sub>®</sub> exercise videos provide partially reliable and moderate-quality information for people with rheumatoid arthritis. However, patients should be cautious and not rely directly on YouTube<sub>®</sub> exercise videos. Instead, they should consult a physician or physical therapist for exercises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"362-369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2024.2334753","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:YouTube®是最繁忙的视频共享平台之一,由于缺乏严格的评估程序,它可能缺乏足够或准确的健康信息和实践信息。目的:本研究旨在评估YouTube®上类风湿性关节炎运动视频的信息可靠性和质量:方法:对视频特征和上传来源进行分类。方法:对视频特征和上传来源进行分类,使用 mDISCERN 也对视频中共享信息的可靠性进行评估,并使用全球质量量表和 JAMA 评分系统对质量进行评估。视频由两名专门从事风湿病康复治疗的物理治疗师进行独立分析。任何偏差均由独立的第三位评估者解决:结果:共收录了 134 个运动视频。在 134 个运动视频中,有 126 个(94%)有用,8 个(6%)有误导性。有用视频和误导性视频的浏览量、点赞数、评论数和订阅者人数相似(p > .05),而在视频来源之间,有用视频的视频时长和上传时间较长(p p = .013)。然而,在 mDISCERN(p = .104)和全球质量量表(p = .128)得分方面没有发现明显差异:YouTube®运动视频为类风湿性关节炎患者提供了部分可靠、中等质量的信息。然而,患者应谨慎行事,不要直接依赖 YouTube® 运动视频。相反,他们应该向医生或理疗师咨询锻炼方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of reliability and quality of YouTube® exercise videos in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

Background: YouTube®, one of the busiest video-sharing platforms, may lack sufficient or accurate information on health information and practices given the absence of a rigorous evaluation process.

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the reliability of information and quality of exercise videos on YouTube® for rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: Video features and the source of the upload were sorted. Reliability of the information shared in the videos was evaluated using the mDISCERN too, and quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale and JAMA scoring system. Videos were independently analyzed by two physiotherapists specialized in rheumatologic rehabilitation. Any bias was resolved by an independent third assessor.

Results: One hundred thirty-four exercise videos were included. A hundred and twenty-six (94%) of the 134 exercise videos were found to be useful, and 8 (6%) were misleading. The useful and misleading videos had similar numbers of views, likes, comments, and subscribers (p > .05), while video duration and time since upload were higher for useful videos (p < .05). Cohen's Kappa scores demonstrated that the level of agreement between the assessors were moderate (mDISCERN = 0.417, Global Quality Scale = 0.582, and JAMA = 0.555). There was a significant difference in JAMA scores (p = .013) between the sources of the videos. However, no significant difference was found in mDISCERN (p = .104) and Global Quality Scale (p = .128) scores.

Conclusion: YouTube® exercise videos provide partially reliable and moderate-quality information for people with rheumatoid arthritis. However, patients should be cautious and not rely directly on YouTube® exercise videos. Instead, they should consult a physician or physical therapist for exercises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
期刊最新文献
Psychometric properties of 3-meter backward walk test (3MBWT) in people with Parkinson disease. Feasibility study of a home-based graded motor imagery intervention (GraMI protocol) for amputees with phantom limb pain. Can physiotherapy in an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation setting improve physical function? A long-term mixed methods follow-up study. "Exploring job demands and resources influencing mental health and work engagement among physical therapists: a cross-sectional survey of Norwegian physical therapists." Reliability and validity of the 6-minute pegboard and ring test for functional exercise capacity in patients with breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1