绘制流动人口社会心理干预证据图:随机研究活数据库的描述性分析

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Global Mental Health Pub Date : 2024-03-08 DOI:10.1017/gmh.2024.33
Camilla Cadorin, Marianna Purgato, Giulia Turrini, Eleonora Prina, Madalena Cabral Ferreira, Doriana Cristofalo, Monica B. Bartucz, Anke B. Witteveen, Marit Sijbrandij, Davide Papola, Corrado Barbui
{"title":"绘制流动人口社会心理干预证据图:随机研究活数据库的描述性分析","authors":"Camilla Cadorin, Marianna Purgato, Giulia Turrini, Eleonora Prina, Madalena Cabral Ferreira, Doriana Cristofalo, Monica B. Bartucz, Anke B. Witteveen, Marit Sijbrandij, Davide Papola, Corrado Barbui","doi":"10.1017/gmh.2024.33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Migrant mental health is a pressing public health issue with wide-ranging implications. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in this population to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions. However, the available evidence is characterized by controversy and fragmentation, with studies focusing on different migrant populations, interventions, outcomes, delivery modalities and settings. Aiming to promote systematic reviews of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in different migrant groups, we have developed a living database of existing RCTs. The development of the database provides an opportunity to map the existing RCT evidence in this population. A total of 135 studies involving 24,859 participants were included in the living database. The distribution of studies by year of publication aligns with the increasing global migrant population in recent years. Most studies focus primarily on adult participants, with a limited representation of children and adolescents, and a prevalence of female participants, which is consistent with epidemiological data, except for older adults, who are underrepresented in research. Studies predominantly focus on refugees and asylum seekers, likely due to their elevated risk of mental health issues, despite the substantial presence of economic migrants worldwide. While studies mainly involve migrants from the Middle East and East Asia, epidemiological data suggest a broader geographic representation, with migrants coming from Eastern Europe, Latin America and South Asia. The present descriptive analysis of RCTs on mental health and psychosocial interventions for migrant populations provides valuable insights into the existing research landscape. It should be used to inform future research efforts, ensuring that studies are more representative of the global migrant population and more responsive to the mental health needs of migrants in different contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48579,"journal":{"name":"Global Mental Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping the evidence on psychosocial interventions for migrant populations: Descriptive analysis of a living database of randomized studies\",\"authors\":\"Camilla Cadorin, Marianna Purgato, Giulia Turrini, Eleonora Prina, Madalena Cabral Ferreira, Doriana Cristofalo, Monica B. Bartucz, Anke B. Witteveen, Marit Sijbrandij, Davide Papola, Corrado Barbui\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/gmh.2024.33\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Migrant mental health is a pressing public health issue with wide-ranging implications. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in this population to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions. However, the available evidence is characterized by controversy and fragmentation, with studies focusing on different migrant populations, interventions, outcomes, delivery modalities and settings. Aiming to promote systematic reviews of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in different migrant groups, we have developed a living database of existing RCTs. The development of the database provides an opportunity to map the existing RCT evidence in this population. A total of 135 studies involving 24,859 participants were included in the living database. The distribution of studies by year of publication aligns with the increasing global migrant population in recent years. Most studies focus primarily on adult participants, with a limited representation of children and adolescents, and a prevalence of female participants, which is consistent with epidemiological data, except for older adults, who are underrepresented in research. Studies predominantly focus on refugees and asylum seekers, likely due to their elevated risk of mental health issues, despite the substantial presence of economic migrants worldwide. While studies mainly involve migrants from the Middle East and East Asia, epidemiological data suggest a broader geographic representation, with migrants coming from Eastern Europe, Latin America and South Asia. The present descriptive analysis of RCTs on mental health and psychosocial interventions for migrant populations provides valuable insights into the existing research landscape. It should be used to inform future research efforts, ensuring that studies are more representative of the global migrant population and more responsive to the mental health needs of migrants in different contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.33\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.33","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

移民心理健康是一个紧迫的公共卫生问题,具有广泛的影响。许多随机对照试验(RCT)都是针对这一人群进行的,以评估社会心理干预措施的效果。然而,现有证据的特点是争议和零散,研究的重点是不同的移民人群、干预措施、结果、实施方式和环境。为了促进对不同移民群体的社会心理干预效果进行系统性回顾,我们开发了一个包含现有 RCTs 的动态数据库。该数据库的开发为我们提供了一个机会,可以对这一人群中现有的 RCT 证据进行摸底。活数据库共收录了 135 项研究,涉及 24859 名参与者。按发表年份划分的研究分布情况与近年来全球移民人口不断增加的趋势相吻合。大多数研究主要关注成年参与者,儿童和青少年的参与人数有限,女性参与者居多,这与流行病学数据一致,但老年人除外,他们在研究中的参与人数较少。研究主要集中在难民和寻求庇护者身上,这可能是由于他们出现心理健康问题的风险较高,尽管世界各地都有大量的经济移民。虽然研究主要涉及来自中东和东亚的移民,但流行病学数据显示,来自东欧、拉丁美洲和南亚的移民具有更广泛的地域代表性。本研究对针对移民群体的心理健康和社会心理干预的 RCT 进行了描述性分析,为了解现有研究情况提供了有价值的见解。今后的研究工作应以此为依据,确保研究更能代表全球移民人口,更能满足不同背景下移民的心理健康需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping the evidence on psychosocial interventions for migrant populations: Descriptive analysis of a living database of randomized studies

Migrant mental health is a pressing public health issue with wide-ranging implications. Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted in this population to assess the effects of psychosocial interventions. However, the available evidence is characterized by controversy and fragmentation, with studies focusing on different migrant populations, interventions, outcomes, delivery modalities and settings. Aiming to promote systematic reviews of the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions in different migrant groups, we have developed a living database of existing RCTs. The development of the database provides an opportunity to map the existing RCT evidence in this population. A total of 135 studies involving 24,859 participants were included in the living database. The distribution of studies by year of publication aligns with the increasing global migrant population in recent years. Most studies focus primarily on adult participants, with a limited representation of children and adolescents, and a prevalence of female participants, which is consistent with epidemiological data, except for older adults, who are underrepresented in research. Studies predominantly focus on refugees and asylum seekers, likely due to their elevated risk of mental health issues, despite the substantial presence of economic migrants worldwide. While studies mainly involve migrants from the Middle East and East Asia, epidemiological data suggest a broader geographic representation, with migrants coming from Eastern Europe, Latin America and South Asia. The present descriptive analysis of RCTs on mental health and psychosocial interventions for migrant populations provides valuable insights into the existing research landscape. It should be used to inform future research efforts, ensuring that studies are more representative of the global migrant population and more responsive to the mental health needs of migrants in different contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Mental Health
Global Mental Health PSYCHIATRY-
自引率
5.10%
发文量
58
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: lobal Mental Health (GMH) is an Open Access journal that publishes papers that have a broad application of ‘the global point of view’ of mental health issues. The field of ‘global mental health’ is still emerging, reflecting a movement of advocacy and associated research driven by an agenda to remedy longstanding treatment gaps and disparities in care, access, and capacity. But these efforts and goals are also driving a potential reframing of knowledge in powerful ways, and positioning a new disciplinary approach to mental health. GMH seeks to cultivate and grow this emerging distinct discipline of ‘global mental health’, and the new knowledge and paradigms that should come from it.
期刊最新文献
Father’s involvement associated with rural children’s depression and anxiety: A large-scale analysis based on data from seven provinces in China Digital mental health interventions for treating mental disorders in young people based in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review of the literature Erratum: Scaling up the task-sharing of psychological therapies: A formative study of the PEERS smartphone application for supervision and quality assurance in rural India - CORRIGENDUM. “I was also trying to protect myself and save my life,” experiences of people living with severe mental illness and their caregivers regarding COVID-19 response in Uganda Erratum: Improving psychosocial well-being and parenting practices among refugees in Uganda: Results of the journey of life effectiveness trial - CORRIGENDUM.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1