为什么名字的流行性是历史性的良好检验标准?

Luuk van de Weghe, Jason Wilson
{"title":"为什么名字的流行性是历史性的良好检验标准?","authors":"Luuk van de Weghe, Jason Wilson","doi":"arxiv-2403.14883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Are name statistics in the Gospels and Acts a good test of historicity? Kamil\nGregor and Brian Blais, in a recent article in The Journal for the Study of the\nHistorical Jesus, argue that the sample of name occurrences in the Gospels and\nActs is too small to be determinative and that several statistical anomalies\nweigh against a positive verdict. Unfortunately, their conclusions result\ndirectly from improper testing and questionable data selection. Chi-squared\ngoodness-of-fit testing establishes that name occurrences in the Gospels and\nActs fit into their historical context at least as good as those in the works\nof Josephus. Additionally, they fit better than occurrences derived from\nancient fictional sources and occurrences from modern, well-researched\nhistorical novels.","PeriodicalId":501323,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity\",\"authors\":\"Luuk van de Weghe, Jason Wilson\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2403.14883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Are name statistics in the Gospels and Acts a good test of historicity? Kamil\\nGregor and Brian Blais, in a recent article in The Journal for the Study of the\\nHistorical Jesus, argue that the sample of name occurrences in the Gospels and\\nActs is too small to be determinative and that several statistical anomalies\\nweigh against a positive verdict. Unfortunately, their conclusions result\\ndirectly from improper testing and questionable data selection. Chi-squared\\ngoodness-of-fit testing establishes that name occurrences in the Gospels and\\nActs fit into their historical context at least as good as those in the works\\nof Josephus. Additionally, they fit better than occurrences derived from\\nancient fictional sources and occurrences from modern, well-researched\\nhistorical novels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.14883\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Other Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2403.14883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

福音书》和《使徒行传》中的姓名统计能很好地检验历史性吗?卡米尔-格雷戈尔(KamilGregor)和布赖恩-布莱斯(Brian Blais)最近在《历史上的耶稣研究期刊》(The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus)上发表文章,认为《福音书》和《使徒行传》中出现姓名的样本太少,不能起决定性作用,而且一些统计上的反常现象也不利于得出肯定的结论。不幸的是,他们的结论直接源于不恰当的测试和可疑的数据选择。契合度检验证明,《福音书》和《使徒行传》中出现的人名与其历史背景的契合度至少不亚于约瑟夫作品中的人名。此外,它们比从古代虚构资料中提取的人名和从现代经过深入研究的历史小说中提取的人名更符合历史背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Name Popularity is a Good Test of Historicity
Are name statistics in the Gospels and Acts a good test of historicity? Kamil Gregor and Brian Blais, in a recent article in The Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, argue that the sample of name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts is too small to be determinative and that several statistical anomalies weigh against a positive verdict. Unfortunately, their conclusions result directly from improper testing and questionable data selection. Chi-squared goodness-of-fit testing establishes that name occurrences in the Gospels and Acts fit into their historical context at least as good as those in the works of Josephus. Additionally, they fit better than occurrences derived from ancient fictional sources and occurrences from modern, well-researched historical novels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Censored Data Forecasting: Applying Tobit Exponential Smoothing with Time Aggregation How to survive the Squid Games using probability theory Cross-sectional personal network analysis of adult smoking in rural areas Modeling information spread across networks with communities using a multitype branching process framework Asymptotic confidence intervals for the difference and the ratio of the weighted kappa coefficients of two diagnostic tests subject to a paired design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1