测量的咀嚼功能与认知状况之间的关系:系统综述。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1111/ger.12751
Kenji Maekawa, Yoshiko Motohashi, Kentaro Igarashi, Takuya Mino, Yasuhiko Kawai, Youngnam Kang, Toshihiro Hirai, Takuo Kuboki
{"title":"测量的咀嚼功能与认知状况之间的关系:系统综述。","authors":"Kenji Maekawa, Yoshiko Motohashi, Kentaro Igarashi, Takuya Mino, Yasuhiko Kawai, Youngnam Kang, Toshihiro Hirai, Takuo Kuboki","doi":"10.1111/ger.12751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the most recent evidence on the association between measured masticatory function and cognitive status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Literature and manual searches were conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL). Observational studies published between 2011 and 2021 investigating the association between masticatory function, dementia and cognitive status in adult humans were abstracted and reviewed by three reviewers. Studies that assessed participants' masticatory function using objective and subjective measurements and that individually examined its association with cognitive function were included. The included studies were divided into cross-sectional and cohort studies, and the quality of each study was analysed using critical appraisal skills checklists. Additionally, the main conclusions and strength of the evidence were assessed for each article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 studies (11 cross-sectional studies that objectively evaluated masticatory function, 9 cross-sectional studies that subjectively evaluated masticatory function and 1 prospective cohort study) were evaluated. The poorer masticatory function was associated with lower cognitive status even after adjusting for potential risk factors of dementia in four of 11 and six of nine cross-sectional studies where the masticatory function was respectively evaluated objectively and subjectively. One prospective cohort study also demonstrated that masticatory function, as evaluated based on measurements of occlusal force, predicted cognitive decline during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several studies demonstrated a positive association between masticatory function and cognitive status. However, further studies, particularly longitudinal studies, are required to determine whether the association is causal.</p>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between measured masticatory function and cognitive status: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Maekawa, Yoshiko Motohashi, Kentaro Igarashi, Takuya Mino, Yasuhiko Kawai, Youngnam Kang, Toshihiro Hirai, Takuo Kuboki\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ger.12751\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the most recent evidence on the association between measured masticatory function and cognitive status.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Literature and manual searches were conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL). Observational studies published between 2011 and 2021 investigating the association between masticatory function, dementia and cognitive status in adult humans were abstracted and reviewed by three reviewers. Studies that assessed participants' masticatory function using objective and subjective measurements and that individually examined its association with cognitive function were included. The included studies were divided into cross-sectional and cohort studies, and the quality of each study was analysed using critical appraisal skills checklists. Additionally, the main conclusions and strength of the evidence were assessed for each article.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 studies (11 cross-sectional studies that objectively evaluated masticatory function, 9 cross-sectional studies that subjectively evaluated masticatory function and 1 prospective cohort study) were evaluated. The poorer masticatory function was associated with lower cognitive status even after adjusting for potential risk factors of dementia in four of 11 and six of nine cross-sectional studies where the masticatory function was respectively evaluated objectively and subjectively. One prospective cohort study also demonstrated that masticatory function, as evaluated based on measurements of occlusal force, predicted cognitive decline during the follow-up period.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Several studies demonstrated a positive association between masticatory function and cognitive status. However, further studies, particularly longitudinal studies, are required to determine whether the association is causal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gerodontology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gerodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12751\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12751","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本系统综述旨在概述有关测量咀嚼功能与认知状况之间关系的最新证据:使用三个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 CINAHL)进行文献检索和人工检索。摘录了 2011 年至 2021 年间发表的观察性研究,这些研究调查了成人咀嚼功能、痴呆症和认知状况之间的关系,并由三名审稿人进行了审查。纳入的研究使用客观和主观测量方法评估了参与者的咀嚼功能,并单独研究了咀嚼功能与认知功能之间的关系。纳入的研究分为横断面研究和队列研究,并使用批判性评价技能检查表对每项研究的质量进行了分析。此外,还对每篇文章的主要结论和证据强度进行了评估:共评估了 21 项研究(11 项客观评估咀嚼功能的横断面研究、9 项主观评估咀嚼功能的横断面研究和 1 项前瞻性队列研究)。在分别对咀嚼功能进行客观评估和主观评估的 11 项横断面研究中,有 4 项研究的咀嚼功能较差,而在对痴呆症的潜在风险因素进行调整后,仍有 6 项研究的咀嚼功能较差与认知能力较低有关。一项前瞻性队列研究也表明,根据咬合力测量结果评估的咀嚼功能可预测随访期间认知能力的下降:多项研究表明,咀嚼功能与认知状况之间存在正相关。结论:多项研究表明,咀嚼功能与认知状况之间存在正相关,但还需要进一步研究,尤其是纵向研究,以确定二者之间是否存在因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Associations between measured masticatory function and cognitive status: A systematic review.

Objective: This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the most recent evidence on the association between measured masticatory function and cognitive status.

Materials and methods: Literature and manual searches were conducted using three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and CINAHL). Observational studies published between 2011 and 2021 investigating the association between masticatory function, dementia and cognitive status in adult humans were abstracted and reviewed by three reviewers. Studies that assessed participants' masticatory function using objective and subjective measurements and that individually examined its association with cognitive function were included. The included studies were divided into cross-sectional and cohort studies, and the quality of each study was analysed using critical appraisal skills checklists. Additionally, the main conclusions and strength of the evidence were assessed for each article.

Results: A total of 21 studies (11 cross-sectional studies that objectively evaluated masticatory function, 9 cross-sectional studies that subjectively evaluated masticatory function and 1 prospective cohort study) were evaluated. The poorer masticatory function was associated with lower cognitive status even after adjusting for potential risk factors of dementia in four of 11 and six of nine cross-sectional studies where the masticatory function was respectively evaluated objectively and subjectively. One prospective cohort study also demonstrated that masticatory function, as evaluated based on measurements of occlusal force, predicted cognitive decline during the follow-up period.

Conclusion: Several studies demonstrated a positive association between masticatory function and cognitive status. However, further studies, particularly longitudinal studies, are required to determine whether the association is causal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
期刊最新文献
Natural products for denture base disinfection: A scoping review. Validity of the Oral Hygiene Ability Instrument (OHAI). Dentists' perceptions of providing care to community-dwelling older people. Distribution of Australian dental practices in relation to residential aged care facilities: A geographic analysis. Mandibular third molar coronectomy in older adults and its effects on oral health-related quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1