炎症性肠病血清游离硫醇前瞻性评估:替代C反应蛋白进行疾病活动性评估的候选指标?

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI:10.1093/ibd/izae069
Anuj Bohra, Nicholas Batt, Krishneel Dutt, Pavel Sluka, Olga Niewiadomski, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R Van Langenberg
{"title":"炎症性肠病血清游离硫醇前瞻性评估:替代C反应蛋白进行疾病活动性评估的候选指标?","authors":"Anuj Bohra, Nicholas Batt, Krishneel Dutt, Pavel Sluka, Olga Niewiadomski, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R Van Langenberg","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum free thiols (SFTs) reflecting oxidative stress appear to correlate with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. We aimed to evaluate the performance of SFTs concentrations vs endoscopic and histological activity, compare SFTs with established biomarkers, and identify clinical and laboratory parameters independently associated with SFT levels in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with confirmed IBD undergoing routine ileocolonoscopy for activity assessment were prospectively recruited, with serum samples obtained concurrently for SFTs and routine bloods, plus fecal calprotectin and immunochemical tests were collected ±30 days from ileocolonoscopy. Endoscopic activity was assessed via established indices and histological activity graded as inactive/mild/moderate. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were utilized to assess performance of SFTs vs endoscopic activity, and multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with SFT levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 (80 Crohn's disease, 61 ulcerative colitis) patients were recruited. Median SFTs were significantly lower in moderate vs inactive/mild endoscopic activity (309 µM vs 433/471 µM, respectively; P < .01). There was no significant difference in median SFTs across inactive/mild/moderate histological activity. SFTs achieved higher sensitivity than C-reactive protein in predicting moderate, endoscopically active disease (89% vs 78%; area under the curve, 0.80 each) yet was outperformed by fecal calprotectin (100%; area under the curve, 0.93). Advancing age and increasing albumin levels were independently associated with SFT levels, and thus are possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study has demonstrated the potential of SFTs as a serum biomarker in IBD. It was more sensitive than C-reactive protein, yet less sensitive than fecal biomarkers for prediction of endoscopically active IBD.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"476-484"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective Evaluation of Serum Free Thiols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Candidate to Replace C-Reactive Protein for Disease Activity Assessment?\",\"authors\":\"Anuj Bohra, Nicholas Batt, Krishneel Dutt, Pavel Sluka, Olga Niewiadomski, Abhinav Vasudevan, Daniel R Van Langenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ibd/izae069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Serum free thiols (SFTs) reflecting oxidative stress appear to correlate with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. We aimed to evaluate the performance of SFTs concentrations vs endoscopic and histological activity, compare SFTs with established biomarkers, and identify clinical and laboratory parameters independently associated with SFT levels in IBD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with confirmed IBD undergoing routine ileocolonoscopy for activity assessment were prospectively recruited, with serum samples obtained concurrently for SFTs and routine bloods, plus fecal calprotectin and immunochemical tests were collected ±30 days from ileocolonoscopy. Endoscopic activity was assessed via established indices and histological activity graded as inactive/mild/moderate. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were utilized to assess performance of SFTs vs endoscopic activity, and multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with SFT levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 141 (80 Crohn's disease, 61 ulcerative colitis) patients were recruited. Median SFTs were significantly lower in moderate vs inactive/mild endoscopic activity (309 µM vs 433/471 µM, respectively; P < .01). There was no significant difference in median SFTs across inactive/mild/moderate histological activity. SFTs achieved higher sensitivity than C-reactive protein in predicting moderate, endoscopically active disease (89% vs 78%; area under the curve, 0.80 each) yet was outperformed by fecal calprotectin (100%; area under the curve, 0.93). Advancing age and increasing albumin levels were independently associated with SFT levels, and thus are possible confounders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This prospective study has demonstrated the potential of SFTs as a serum biomarker in IBD. It was more sensitive than C-reactive protein, yet less sensitive than fecal biomarkers for prediction of endoscopically active IBD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"476-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae069\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae069","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:反映氧化应激的血清游离硫醇(SFTs)似乎与炎症性肠病(IBD)的活动相关。我们的目的是评估 SFTs 浓度与内镜和组织学活动的相关性,将 SFTs 与已确立的生物标记物进行比较,并确定与 IBD 患者 SFT 水平独立相关的临床和实验室参数:前瞻性地招募了接受常规回肠结肠镜检查以评估活动性的确诊 IBD 患者,并在回肠结肠镜检查后 30 天内同时采集血清样本以检测 SFTs 和常规血液,以及粪便钙蛋白和免疫化学检验。内镜活动通过既定指标进行评估,组织学活动分为非活动/轻度/中度。利用接收者工作特征曲线分析评估 SFT 与内镜活动的关系,并利用多元回归分析确定与 SFT 水平相关的因素:共招募了 141 名患者(80 名克罗恩病患者,61 名溃疡性结肠炎患者)。中度内镜活动与非活动/轻度内镜活动的 SFT 中位数明显较低(分别为 309 µM 与 433/471 µM;P 结论:这项前瞻性研究表明,SFT 水平与溃疡性结肠炎的相关性很高:这项前瞻性研究证明了 SFTs 作为 IBD 血清生物标志物的潜力。在预测内镜下活动性 IBD 方面,它比 C 反应蛋白更敏感,但不如粪便生物标记物敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prospective Evaluation of Serum Free Thiols in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Candidate to Replace C-Reactive Protein for Disease Activity Assessment?

Background: Serum free thiols (SFTs) reflecting oxidative stress appear to correlate with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity. We aimed to evaluate the performance of SFTs concentrations vs endoscopic and histological activity, compare SFTs with established biomarkers, and identify clinical and laboratory parameters independently associated with SFT levels in IBD patients.

Methods: Patients with confirmed IBD undergoing routine ileocolonoscopy for activity assessment were prospectively recruited, with serum samples obtained concurrently for SFTs and routine bloods, plus fecal calprotectin and immunochemical tests were collected ±30 days from ileocolonoscopy. Endoscopic activity was assessed via established indices and histological activity graded as inactive/mild/moderate. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analyses were utilized to assess performance of SFTs vs endoscopic activity, and multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with SFT levels.

Results: A total of 141 (80 Crohn's disease, 61 ulcerative colitis) patients were recruited. Median SFTs were significantly lower in moderate vs inactive/mild endoscopic activity (309 µM vs 433/471 µM, respectively; P < .01). There was no significant difference in median SFTs across inactive/mild/moderate histological activity. SFTs achieved higher sensitivity than C-reactive protein in predicting moderate, endoscopically active disease (89% vs 78%; area under the curve, 0.80 each) yet was outperformed by fecal calprotectin (100%; area under the curve, 0.93). Advancing age and increasing albumin levels were independently associated with SFT levels, and thus are possible confounders.

Conclusions: This prospective study has demonstrated the potential of SFTs as a serum biomarker in IBD. It was more sensitive than C-reactive protein, yet less sensitive than fecal biomarkers for prediction of endoscopically active IBD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
期刊最新文献
Erythrocyte Methotrexate-Polyglutamate Concentrations in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Single-Cell Transcriptomic Profile of Innate Cell Populations in Mesenteric Lymph Nodes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients. Placental Transfer of Upadacitinib Among Pregnant Women with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Addressing the Challenges of Inflammatory Bowel Disease-Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis Treatment: Prognosis Optimization Strategies in the Era of Precision Medicine. Impact of Psychosocial and Neurodevelopmental Disorders on Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1