Giorgio Cazzaniga, Francesco Mascadri, Stefano Marletta, Alessandro Caputo, Gabriele Guidi, Giovanni Gambaro, Albino Eccher, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Fabio Pagni, Vincenzo L'Imperio
{"title":"组织学诊断数字显示器(监视器)基准:肾病理学用例。","authors":"Giorgio Cazzaniga, Francesco Mascadri, Stefano Marletta, Alessandro Caputo, Gabriele Guidi, Giovanni Gambaro, Albino Eccher, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Fabio Pagni, Vincenzo L'Imperio","doi":"10.1136/jcp-2024-209418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6-8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ<i>=</i>1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgio Cazzaniga, Francesco Mascadri, Stefano Marletta, Alessandro Caputo, Gabriele Guidi, Giovanni Gambaro, Albino Eccher, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Fabio Pagni, Vincenzo L'Imperio\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jcp-2024-209418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6-8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ<i>=</i>1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15391,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209418\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp-2024-209418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:通过引入创新技术,促进基于全切片图像(WSI)的初级诊断,病理实验室的数字化转型正在持续进行。在此,我们提出了一个用于肾活检初步诊断的病理专用医疗监视器的真实基准,评估了 "传统 "显微镜与使用不同扫描仪 WSI 的商用监视器之间的一致性:使用病理专用医疗级(MG)、专业级(PG)和现成的消费者级(COTS)监视器,对来自三台扫描仪(Aperio、3DHISTECH 和 Hamamatsu)的 60 例连续肾活检样本进行了美国病理学家学会 WSI 验证指导,并在 2 周冲洗期后将结果与显微镜诊断结果进行比较:结果:MG 监测器更快(1090 分钟 vs 1159 分钟 vs 1181 分钟,delta 为 6-8%,p=1)。在具体评分/分类方面存在微小差异,MG 和 PG 监测器更接近参考报告(r=0.98,95% CI=0.83 至 1 vs 0.98,95% CI=0.83 至 1 vs 0.91,95% CI=0.76 至 1,κ=0.93,95% CI=077 至 1 vs 0.93,95% CI=0.77 至 1 vs 0.86,95% CI=0.64 至 1,κ=1 vs 0.50,95% CI=0 至 1 vs 0.50,95% CI=0 至 1,分别为 IgA、抗中性粒细胞胞浆抗体和狼疮肾炎)。通过刚果红荧光数字分析检测淀粉样蛋白的流水线在两台显示器上都检测到了淀粉样变性(30 例中有 4 例,占 13%),可检测到极少量的间质沉积,但淀粉样蛋白评分略有高估(平均 6 分对 7 分):数字化转型需要对硬件组件进行仔细评估,以支持智能、安全的诊断过程。在这一过程中,选择用于 WSI 的显示器至关重要,需要进行充分规划。
Benchmarking digital displays (monitors) for histological diagnoses: the nephropathology use case.
Aim: The digital transformation of the pathology laboratory is being continuously sustained by the introduction of innovative technologies promoting whole slide image (WSI)-based primary diagnosis. Here, we proposed a real-life benchmark of a pathology-dedicated medical monitor for the primary diagnosis of renal biopsies, evaluating the concordance between the 'traditional' microscope and commercial monitors using WSI from different scanners.
Methods: The College of American Pathologists WSI validation guidelines were used on 60 consecutive renal biopsies from three scanners (Aperio, 3DHISTECH and Hamamatsu) using pathology-dedicated medical grade (MG), professional grade (PG) and consumer-off-the-shelf (COTS) monitors, comparing results with the microscope diagnosis after a 2-week washout period.
Results: MG monitor was faster (1090 vs 1159 vs 1181 min, delta of 6-8%, p<0.01), with slightly better performances on the detection of concurrent diseases compared with COTS (κ=1 vs 0.96, 95% CI=0.87 to 1), but equal concordance to the commercial monitors on main diagnosis (κ=1). Minor discrepancies were noted on specific scores/classifications, with MG and PG monitors closer to the reference report (r=0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.98, 95% CI=0.83 to 1 vs 0.91, 95% CI=0.76 to 1, κ=0.93, 95% CI=077 to 1 vs 0.93, 95% CI=0.77 to 1 vs 0.86, 95% CI=0.64 to 1, κ=1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1 vs 0.50, 95% CI=0 to 1, for IgA, antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody and lupus nephritis, respectively). Streamlined Pipeline for Amyloid detection through congo red fluorescence Digital Analysis detected amyloidosis on both monitors (4 of 30, 13% cases), allowing detection of minimal interstitial deposits with slight overestimation of the Amyloid Score (average 6 vs 7).
Conclusions: The digital transformation needs careful assessment of the hardware component to support a smart and safe diagnostic process. Choosing the display for WSI is critical in the process and requires adequate planning.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Pathology is a leading international journal covering all aspects of pathology. Diagnostic and research areas covered include histopathology, virology, haematology, microbiology, cytopathology, chemical pathology, molecular pathology, forensic pathology, dermatopathology, neuropathology and immunopathology. Each issue contains Reviews, Original articles, Short reports, Correspondence and more.