Mohamed M. Aly , Sebastian F. Bigdon , Ulrich J.A. Speigl , Gaston Camino-Willhuber , Saleh Baeesa , Klaus J. Schnake
{"title":"实现磁共振成像对无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折决策影响的标准化报告:概念框架和拟议方法","authors":"Mohamed M. Aly , Sebastian F. Bigdon , Ulrich J.A. Speigl , Gaston Camino-Willhuber , Saleh Baeesa , Klaus J. Schnake","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a <em>''Gold standard''and should follow</em> standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432/pdfft?md5=c1f43a0ecd43fb96c4cc71429050278d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000432-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a standardized reporting of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the decision-making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit: Conceptual framework and proposed methodology\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed M. Aly , Sebastian F. Bigdon , Ulrich J.A. Speigl , Gaston Camino-Willhuber , Saleh Baeesa , Klaus J. Schnake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a <em>''Gold standard''and should follow</em> standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432/pdfft?md5=c1f43a0ecd43fb96c4cc71429050278d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000432-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言最近的一项荟萃分析显示,之前只有四项研究表明磁共振成像(MRI)可以改变17%病例的骨折分类和22%病例的治疗决策。然而,之前的研究在研究人群、后韧带复合体(PLC)损伤的定义和结果测量方面存在很大的方法学差异。研究问题我们如何才能规范磁共振成像对神经系统完好的胸腰椎骨折患者的影响的报告? 材料和方法回顾了所有关于磁共振成像对胸腰椎骨折分类或决策影响的现有文献。估算 MRI 对 TLF 分类的影响是将 CT 分析 PLC 损伤的准确性与 MRI 作为 "金标准 "进行对比的一项工作,应遵循标准化检查表,如《诊断准确性研究报告标准》(Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies)。此外,还应解决与 TLF 相关的具体问题。结果提出了一种标准化方法,用于报告 MRI 对神经系统完好的 TLF 患者的影响。在患者选择方面,限制纳入神经功能完好的 A 型和 B 型损伤患者至关重要。图像解读应规范成像方案和 PLC 损伤的适当标准。MRI 的影响可以通过骨折分类的变化率或治疗决定来衡量;我们对每种衡量方法的利弊进行了深入讨论。讨论和结论我们提出了一种结构化方法,用于研究 MRI 对神经系统完好的 TLF 患者的影响,重点是适当的患者选择、标准化图像分析和临床相关的结果衡量。
Towards a standardized reporting of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the decision-making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit: Conceptual framework and proposed methodology
Introduction
A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.
Research question
How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?
Material and methods
All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a ''Gold standard''and should follow standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.
Results
A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.
Discussion and conclusion
We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.