实现磁共振成像对无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折决策影响的标准化报告:概念框架和拟议方法

IF 1.9 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain & spine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bas.2024.102787
Mohamed M. Aly , Sebastian F. Bigdon , Ulrich J.A. Speigl , Gaston Camino-Willhuber , Saleh Baeesa , Klaus J. Schnake
{"title":"实现磁共振成像对无神经功能缺损的胸腰椎骨折决策影响的标准化报告:概念框架和拟议方法","authors":"Mohamed M. Aly ,&nbsp;Sebastian F. Bigdon ,&nbsp;Ulrich J.A. Speigl ,&nbsp;Gaston Camino-Willhuber ,&nbsp;Saleh Baeesa ,&nbsp;Klaus J. Schnake","doi":"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a <em>''Gold standard''and should follow</em> standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72443,"journal":{"name":"Brain & spine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432/pdfft?md5=c1f43a0ecd43fb96c4cc71429050278d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000432-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards a standardized reporting of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the decision-making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit: Conceptual framework and proposed methodology\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed M. Aly ,&nbsp;Sebastian F. Bigdon ,&nbsp;Ulrich J.A. Speigl ,&nbsp;Gaston Camino-Willhuber ,&nbsp;Saleh Baeesa ,&nbsp;Klaus J. Schnake\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bas.2024.102787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.</p></div><div><h3>Research question</h3><p>How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a <em>''Gold standard''and should follow</em> standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusion</h3><p>We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain & spine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432/pdfft?md5=c1f43a0ecd43fb96c4cc71429050278d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772529424000432-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain & spine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain & spine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772529424000432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言最近的一项荟萃分析显示,之前只有四项研究表明磁共振成像(MRI)可以改变17%病例的骨折分类和22%病例的治疗决策。然而,之前的研究在研究人群、后韧带复合体(PLC)损伤的定义和结果测量方面存在很大的方法学差异。研究问题我们如何才能规范磁共振成像对神经系统完好的胸腰椎骨折患者的影响的报告? 材料和方法回顾了所有关于磁共振成像对胸腰椎骨折分类或决策影响的现有文献。估算 MRI 对 TLF 分类的影响是将 CT 分析 PLC 损伤的准确性与 MRI 作为 "金标准 "进行对比的一项工作,应遵循标准化检查表,如《诊断准确性研究报告标准》(Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies)。此外,还应解决与 TLF 相关的具体问题。结果提出了一种标准化方法,用于报告 MRI 对神经系统完好的 TLF 患者的影响。在患者选择方面,限制纳入神经功能完好的 A 型和 B 型损伤患者至关重要。图像解读应规范成像方案和 PLC 损伤的适当标准。MRI 的影响可以通过骨折分类的变化率或治疗决定来衡量;我们对每种衡量方法的利弊进行了深入讨论。讨论和结论我们提出了一种结构化方法,用于研究 MRI 对神经系统完好的 TLF 患者的影响,重点是适当的患者选择、标准化图像分析和临床相关的结果衡量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards a standardized reporting of the impact of magnetic resonance imaging on the decision-making of thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit: Conceptual framework and proposed methodology

Introduction

A recent meta-analysis showed that only four prior studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can change the fracture classification in 17% and treatment decisions in 22% of cases. However, previous studies showed a wide methodological variability regarding the study population, the definition of posterior ligamentous complex (PLC) injury, and outcome measures.

Research question

How can we standardize the reporting of the impact of MRI for neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar fractures?

Material and methods

All available literature regarding the impact of MRI on thoracolumbar fracture classification or decision-making were reviewed. Estimating the impact of MRI on the TLFs' classification is an exercise of analyzing the CTs' accuracy for PLC injury against MRI as a ''Gold standard''and should follow standardized checklists such as the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. Additionally, specific issues related to TLFs should be addressed.

Results

A standardized approach for reporting the impact of MRI in neurologically intact TLF patients was proposed. Regarding patient selection, restricting the inclusion of neurologically intact patients with A- and B-injuries is crucial. Image interpretation should be standardized regarding imaging protocol and appropriate criteria for PLC injury. The impact of MRI can be measured by either the rate of change in fracture classification or treatment decisions; the cons and pros of each measure is thoroughly discussed.

Discussion and conclusion

We proposed a structured methodology for examining the impact of MRI on neurologically intact patients with TLFs, focusing on appropriate patient selection, standardizing image analysis, and clinically relevant outcome measures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain & spine
Brain & spine Surgery
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
71 days
期刊最新文献
Fat beyond muscle: Assessing epimuscular fat of the lumbar spine and its association with vertebral level, demographics, BMI, and low back pain. The application of medical ethics in the developing countries - A neurosurgical perspective. Machine learning predictive model for lumbar disc reherniation following microsurgical discectomy. A systematic review evaluating the association of atherosclerosis and lumbar degenerative disc disease. Consensus statement by the Belgian Society of Neurosurgery and literature review on the diagnosis and management of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1