非一即无:简单类型 Lambda 微积分的反统一性

IF 0.7 4区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS ACM Transactions on Computational Logic Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1145/3654798
David M. Cerna, Michal Buran
{"title":"非一即无:简单类型 Lambda 微积分的反统一性","authors":"David M. Cerna, Michal Buran","doi":"10.1145/3654798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Generalization techniques have many applications, including template construction, argument generalization, and indexing. Modern interactive provers can exploit advancement in generalization methods over expressive type theories to further develop proof generalization techniques and other transformations. So far, investigations concerned with anti-unification (AU) over <i>λ</i>-terms and similar type theories have focused on developing algorithms for well-studied variants. These variants forbid the nesting of generalization variables, restrict the structure of their arguments, and are <i>unitary</i>. Extending these methods to more expressive variants is important to applications. We consider the case of nested generalization variables and show that the AU problem is <i>nullary</i> (using <i>capture-avoiding</i> substitutions), even when the arguments to free variables are severely restricted.</p>","PeriodicalId":50916,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus\",\"authors\":\"David M. Cerna, Michal Buran\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3654798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Generalization techniques have many applications, including template construction, argument generalization, and indexing. Modern interactive provers can exploit advancement in generalization methods over expressive type theories to further develop proof generalization techniques and other transformations. So far, investigations concerned with anti-unification (AU) over <i>λ</i>-terms and similar type theories have focused on developing algorithms for well-studied variants. These variants forbid the nesting of generalization variables, restrict the structure of their arguments, and are <i>unitary</i>. Extending these methods to more expressive variants is important to applications. We consider the case of nested generalization variables and show that the AU problem is <i>nullary</i> (using <i>capture-avoiding</i> substitutions), even when the arguments to free variables are severely restricted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3654798\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Computational Logic","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3654798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

泛化技术有很多应用,包括模板构建、参数泛化和索引。现代交互式证明可以利用表现力强的类型理论上泛化方法的进步,进一步发展证明泛化技术和其他转换。迄今为止,有关λ-术语和类似类型理论的反统一(AU)的研究主要集中在为研究得很好的变体开发算法。这些变体禁止泛化变量嵌套,限制参数结构,而且是单元式的。将这些方法扩展到更具表现力的变体对应用非常重要。我们考虑了嵌套广义变量的情况,并证明即使自由变量的参数受到严格限制,AU 问题也是无效的(使用避免捕获的替换)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus

Generalization techniques have many applications, including template construction, argument generalization, and indexing. Modern interactive provers can exploit advancement in generalization methods over expressive type theories to further develop proof generalization techniques and other transformations. So far, investigations concerned with anti-unification (AU) over λ-terms and similar type theories have focused on developing algorithms for well-studied variants. These variants forbid the nesting of generalization variables, restrict the structure of their arguments, and are unitary. Extending these methods to more expressive variants is important to applications. We consider the case of nested generalization variables and show that the AU problem is nullary (using capture-avoiding substitutions), even when the arguments to free variables are severely restricted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic
ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: TOCL welcomes submissions related to all aspects of logic as it pertains to topics in computer science. This area has a great tradition in computer science. Several researchers who earned the ACM Turing award have also contributed to this field, namely Edgar Codd (relational database systems), Stephen Cook (complexity of logical theories), Edsger W. Dijkstra, Robert W. Floyd, Tony Hoare, Amir Pnueli, Dana Scott, Edmond M. Clarke, Allen E. Emerson, and Joseph Sifakis (program logics, program derivation and verification, programming languages semantics), Robin Milner (interactive theorem proving, concurrency calculi, and functional programming), and John McCarthy (functional programming and logics in AI). Logic continues to play an important role in computer science and has permeated several of its areas, including artificial intelligence, computational complexity, database systems, and programming languages. The Editorial Board of this journal seeks and hopes to attract high-quality submissions in all the above-mentioned areas of computational logic so that TOCL becomes the standard reference in the field. Both theoretical and applied papers are sought. Submissions showing novel use of logic in computer science are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Fundamental Logic is Decidable Strong Backdoors for Default Logic One or Nothing: Anti-unification over the Simply-Typed Lambda Calculus Stackelberg-Pareto Synthesis First-Order Temporal Logic on Finite Traces: Semantic Properties, Decidable Fragments, and Applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1