Development of A New Scoring System in Higher Animals for Testing Cognitive Function in the Newborn Period: Effect of Prenatal Hypoxia-Ischemia.

Introduction Enhanced models for assessing cognitive function in the neonatal period are imperative in higher animals. Postnatal motor deficits, characteristic of cerebral palsy, emerge in newborn kits within our prenatal-rabbit model of hypoxia-ischemia (HI). In humans, prenatal HI leads to intellectual disability and cerebral palsy. In a study examining cognitive function in newborn rabbits, we explored several questions. Is there a distinction between conditioned and unconditioned kits? Can the kits discern the human face or the lab coat? Do motorically-normal kits, born after prenatal HI, exhibit cognitive deficits? Methods The conditioning protocol was randomly assigned to kits from each litter. For conditioning, the same human, wearing a lab coat, fed the rabbit kits for 9 days before the cognitive test. The 6-arm radial maze was chosen for its simplicity and ease of use. Normally appearing kits, born after uterine ischemia at 79% or 92% term in New Zealand White rabbits, were compared to Naïve kits. On postpartum day 22/23 or 29/30, the 6-arm maze helped determine if the kits recognized the original feeder from bystander (Test-1) or the lab coat on bystander (Test-2). The use of masks of feeder/bystander (Test-3) assessed confounding cues. A weighted score was devised to address variability in entry to maze arms, time, and repeated-trial learning. Results In conditioned kits, both Naïve and HI kits exhibited a significant preference for the face of the feeder, but not the lab coat. Cognitive deficits were minimal in normal-appearing HI kits. Conclusion The weighted score system was amenable to statistical manipulation.