关于内镜超声造影治疗胰腺癌疗效的荟萃分析

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Clinics Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100348
Min Xuan, Na Li, Chunyan Wu
{"title":"关于内镜超声造影治疗胰腺癌疗效的荟萃分析","authors":"Min Xuan,&nbsp;Na Li,&nbsp;Chunyan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from the inception of the databases to June 2022. RevMan 5.3.0 software was utilized for data analysis. In total, 13 self-descriptive studies, which enrolled 382 patients, were finally included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was revealed that EUS for the treatment of pancreatic cancer exhibited a lower incidence of adverse reactions (Relative Risk Ration [RR = 0.23], 95 % Confidence interval [95 % CI 0.23–0.23]), a higher success rate (RR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.90–0.90), and a low failure rate (RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.06–0.06). Moreover, EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN) not only significantly relieved pancreatic cancer patients’ pain (RR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.83–0.83), but also significantly eliminated pain in some patients (RR = 0.09, 95 % CI 0.09–0.09). The effects of EUS on pancreatic cancer treatment were satisfactory, and few adverse reactions were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Owing to the restricted sample size in this meta-analysis, primarily consisting of descriptive studies, it was imperative to conduct more rigorously designed, multi-center, long-term follow-up, larger sample, and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to validate the findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000255/pdfft?md5=af25fcba895a6132a5d2dad07bb20036&pid=1-s2.0-S1807593224000255-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A meta-analysis on the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for treatment of pancreatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"Min Xuan,&nbsp;Na Li,&nbsp;Chunyan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from the inception of the databases to June 2022. RevMan 5.3.0 software was utilized for data analysis. In total, 13 self-descriptive studies, which enrolled 382 patients, were finally included.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>It was revealed that EUS for the treatment of pancreatic cancer exhibited a lower incidence of adverse reactions (Relative Risk Ration [RR = 0.23], 95 % Confidence interval [95 % CI 0.23–0.23]), a higher success rate (RR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.90–0.90), and a low failure rate (RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.06–0.06). Moreover, EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN) not only significantly relieved pancreatic cancer patients’ pain (RR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.83–0.83), but also significantly eliminated pain in some patients (RR = 0.09, 95 % CI 0.09–0.09). The effects of EUS on pancreatic cancer treatment were satisfactory, and few adverse reactions were found.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Owing to the restricted sample size in this meta-analysis, primarily consisting of descriptive studies, it was imperative to conduct more rigorously designed, multi-center, long-term follow-up, larger sample, and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to validate the findings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000255/pdfft?md5=af25fcba895a6132a5d2dad07bb20036&pid=1-s2.0-S1807593224000255-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000255\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593224000255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Google Scholar数据库,检索时间从数据库建立之初至2022年6月。使用RevMan 5.3.0软件进行数据分析。结果显示,EUS 治疗胰腺癌的不良反应发生率较低(相对风险系数 [RR = 0.23],95 % 置信区间 [95 % CI 0.23-0.23]),成功率较高(RR = 0.90,95 % CI 0.90-0.90),失败率较低(RR = 0.06,95 % CI 0.06-0.06)。此外,EUS引导下的腹腔神经丛神经切断术(EUS-CPN)不仅能显著缓解胰腺癌患者的疼痛(RR = 0.83,95 % CI 0.83-0.83),还能明显消除部分患者的疼痛(RR = 0.09,95 % CI 0.09-0.09)。结论由于该荟萃分析的样本量有限,且主要由描述性研究组成,因此必须开展设计更严谨、多中心、长期随访、样本量更大的随机对照试验(RCT)来验证研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A meta-analysis on the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasonography for treatment of pancreatic cancer

Objective

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases were searched from the inception of the databases to June 2022. RevMan 5.3.0 software was utilized for data analysis. In total, 13 self-descriptive studies, which enrolled 382 patients, were finally included.

Results

It was revealed that EUS for the treatment of pancreatic cancer exhibited a lower incidence of adverse reactions (Relative Risk Ration [RR = 0.23], 95 % Confidence interval [95 % CI 0.23–0.23]), a higher success rate (RR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.90–0.90), and a low failure rate (RR = 0.06, 95 % CI 0.06–0.06). Moreover, EUS-guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN) not only significantly relieved pancreatic cancer patients’ pain (RR = 0.83, 95 % CI 0.83–0.83), but also significantly eliminated pain in some patients (RR = 0.09, 95 % CI 0.09–0.09). The effects of EUS on pancreatic cancer treatment were satisfactory, and few adverse reactions were found.

Conclusion

Owing to the restricted sample size in this meta-analysis, primarily consisting of descriptive studies, it was imperative to conduct more rigorously designed, multi-center, long-term follow-up, larger sample, and Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) to validate the findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
期刊最新文献
IMP3, CDK4, MDM2 and β-catenin expression in Enchondroma and Central Chondrosarcoma: Diagnostic and prognostic utility. Demographic characteristics and clinical-radiological correlation in patients with indications for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A cross-sectional study. Intraoperative changes of surgical approach and a second surgery after percutaneous endoscopic surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Assessment of body composition by dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry in renal transplant patients, hemodialysis patients, and a control group of healthy subjects. Liver biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predicts no impact on antiviral response in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1