评估 "最后一英里 "配送的空间不平等:全国性分析

Travis Fried, Anne Victoria Goodchild, Ivan Sanchez-Diaz, Michael Browne
{"title":"评估 \"最后一英里 \"配送的空间不平等:全国性分析","authors":"Travis Fried, Anne Victoria Goodchild, Ivan Sanchez-Diaz, Michael Browne","doi":"10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Despite large bodies of research related to the impacts of e-commerce on last-mile logistics and sustainability, there has been limited effort to evaluate urban freight using an equity lens. Therefore, this study proposes a modeling framework that enables researchers and planners to estimate the baseline equity performance of a major e-commerce platform and evaluate equity impacts of possible urban freight management strategies. The study also analyzes the sensitivity of various operational decisions to mitigate bias in the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The model adapts empirical methodologies from activity-based modeling, transport equity evaluation, and residential freight trip generation (RFTG) to estimate person- and household-level delivery demand and cargo van traffic exposure in 41 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Evaluating 12 measurements across varying population segments and spatial units, the study finds robust evidence for racial and socio-economic inequities in last-mile delivery for low-income and, especially, populations of color (POC). By the most conservative measurement, POC are exposed to roughly 35% more cargo van traffic than white populations on average, despite ordering less than half as many packages. The study explores the model’s utility by evaluating a simple scenario that finds marginal equity gains for urban freight management strategies that prioritize line-haul efficiency improvements over those improving intra-neighborhood circulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Presents a first effort in building a modeling framework for more equitable decision-making in last-mile delivery operations and broader city planning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating spatial inequity in last-mile delivery: a national analysis\",\"authors\":\"Travis Fried, Anne Victoria Goodchild, Ivan Sanchez-Diaz, Michael Browne\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Despite large bodies of research related to the impacts of e-commerce on last-mile logistics and sustainability, there has been limited effort to evaluate urban freight using an equity lens. Therefore, this study proposes a modeling framework that enables researchers and planners to estimate the baseline equity performance of a major e-commerce platform and evaluate equity impacts of possible urban freight management strategies. The study also analyzes the sensitivity of various operational decisions to mitigate bias in the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The model adapts empirical methodologies from activity-based modeling, transport equity evaluation, and residential freight trip generation (RFTG) to estimate person- and household-level delivery demand and cargo van traffic exposure in 41 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Evaluating 12 measurements across varying population segments and spatial units, the study finds robust evidence for racial and socio-economic inequities in last-mile delivery for low-income and, especially, populations of color (POC). By the most conservative measurement, POC are exposed to roughly 35% more cargo van traffic than white populations on average, despite ordering less than half as many packages. The study explores the model’s utility by evaluating a simple scenario that finds marginal equity gains for urban freight management strategies that prioritize line-haul efficiency improvements over those improving intra-neighborhood circulations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Presents a first effort in building a modeling framework for more equitable decision-making in last-mile delivery operations and broader city planning.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":14251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0301\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2023-0301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的尽管有大量研究涉及电子商务对最后一英里物流和可持续性的影响,但使用公平视角评估城市货运的努力却很有限。因此,本研究提出了一个建模框架,使研究人员和规划人员能够估算一个主要电子商务平台的基准公平绩效,并评估可能的城市货运管理策略对公平的影响。本研究还分析了各种运营决策的敏感性,以减少分析中的偏差。该模型采用了基于活动的建模、运输公平评估和居民货运出行生成(RFTG)等经验方法,以估算美国 41 个大都会统计区的个人和家庭配送需求以及货运车交通风险。研究结果通过对不同人口群体和空间单位的 12 项测量进行评估,研究发现了强有力的证据,证明低收入人群,尤其是有色人种 (POC) 在最后一英里配送方面存在种族和社会经济不平等。根据最保守的测算,尽管有色人种订购的包裹数量不到白人的一半,但他们平均比白人多接触大约 35% 的货运车。该研究通过评估一个简单的方案来探索模型的实用性,该方案发现,城市货运管理策略优先考虑提高线路运输效率,而不是改善街区内循环,从而实现边际公平收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluating spatial inequity in last-mile delivery: a national analysis

Purpose

Despite large bodies of research related to the impacts of e-commerce on last-mile logistics and sustainability, there has been limited effort to evaluate urban freight using an equity lens. Therefore, this study proposes a modeling framework that enables researchers and planners to estimate the baseline equity performance of a major e-commerce platform and evaluate equity impacts of possible urban freight management strategies. The study also analyzes the sensitivity of various operational decisions to mitigate bias in the analysis.

Design/methodology/approach

The model adapts empirical methodologies from activity-based modeling, transport equity evaluation, and residential freight trip generation (RFTG) to estimate person- and household-level delivery demand and cargo van traffic exposure in 41 U.S. Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs).

Findings

Evaluating 12 measurements across varying population segments and spatial units, the study finds robust evidence for racial and socio-economic inequities in last-mile delivery for low-income and, especially, populations of color (POC). By the most conservative measurement, POC are exposed to roughly 35% more cargo van traffic than white populations on average, despite ordering less than half as many packages. The study explores the model’s utility by evaluating a simple scenario that finds marginal equity gains for urban freight management strategies that prioritize line-haul efficiency improvements over those improving intra-neighborhood circulations.

Originality/value

Presents a first effort in building a modeling framework for more equitable decision-making in last-mile delivery operations and broader city planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.40%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: IJPDLM seeks strategically focused, theoretically grounded, empirical and conceptual, quantitative and qualitative, rigorous and relevant, original research studies in logistics, physical distribution and supply chain management operations and associated strategic issues. Quantitatively oriented mathematical and modelling research papers are not suitable for IJPDLM. Desired topics include, but are not limited to: Customer service strategy Omni-channel and multi-channel distribution innovations Order processing and inventory management Implementation of supply chain processes Information and communication technology Sourcing and procurement Risk management and security Personnel recruitment and training Sustainability and environmental Collaboration and integration Global supply chain management and network complexity Information and knowledge management Legal, financial and public policy Retailing, channels and business-to-business management Organizational and human resource development Logistics and SCM education.
期刊最新文献
Cyber risk management strategies and integration: toward supply chain cyber resilience and robustness The paradoxical nature of greening transportation: an analysis of tensions in buyer–supplier dyads System-level impacts of electrification on the road freight transport system: a dynamic approach Navigating diversity in supply chain relationships: building trustworthiness through complementary and supplementary fits The impact of order fulfillment on consumer experience: text mining consumer reviews from Amazon US
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1