评估混合物相对脆性的方法

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1021/acs.jced.3c00765
Joshua Marx, Kai Langenbach, Maximilian Kohns
{"title":"评估混合物相对脆性的方法","authors":"Joshua Marx, Kai Langenbach, Maximilian Kohns","doi":"10.1021/acs.jced.3c00765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relative permittivities of binary mixtures of model fluids, i.e., mixtures of two different Stockmayer fluids or Stockmayer + Lennard-Jones mixtures, are studied comprehensively using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The molecular interaction parameters are varied systematically in such a way that the mixtures possess very different types of vapor–liquid equilibrium behavior. The simulation results reveal that in line with findings from previous work on pure components, also for these mixtures the relative permittivity is a univariate function of the dipole strength, which combines the influence of density, inverse temperature, the squared dipole moments of the components, and their mole fractions. Furthermore, the capabilities of the molecular thermodynamics framework COFFEE are extended to describing permittivities in such mixtures predictively. This is achieved by using Kirkwood’s equation for the relative permittivity together with the orientational information provided by COFFEE, which is necessary for calculating the Kirkwood factor. A suitable expression for the Kirkwood factor of mixtures is derived in detail. The predictions obtained with COFFEE as well as results from perturbation theories and empirical mixing rules from the literature are assessed systematically by comparison to the MD results. It is found that the perturbation theories developed solely for the purpose of modeling relative permittivities describe the data accurately, while only one of the empirical mixing rules does so as well. The new extension of COFFEE does not match the MD data as accurately; however, the main deficiencies arise from inaccuracies in the pure-component permittivities, while the general mixing characteristics are predicted correctly in all cases. The largest deviations occur at high densities and dipole moments, where it is known that the approximations in COFFEE lead to deviations in the orientation behavior.","PeriodicalId":42,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Approaches towards the Relative Permittivity of Mixtures\",\"authors\":\"Joshua Marx, Kai Langenbach, Maximilian Kohns\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jced.3c00765\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Relative permittivities of binary mixtures of model fluids, i.e., mixtures of two different Stockmayer fluids or Stockmayer + Lennard-Jones mixtures, are studied comprehensively using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The molecular interaction parameters are varied systematically in such a way that the mixtures possess very different types of vapor–liquid equilibrium behavior. The simulation results reveal that in line with findings from previous work on pure components, also for these mixtures the relative permittivity is a univariate function of the dipole strength, which combines the influence of density, inverse temperature, the squared dipole moments of the components, and their mole fractions. Furthermore, the capabilities of the molecular thermodynamics framework COFFEE are extended to describing permittivities in such mixtures predictively. This is achieved by using Kirkwood’s equation for the relative permittivity together with the orientational information provided by COFFEE, which is necessary for calculating the Kirkwood factor. A suitable expression for the Kirkwood factor of mixtures is derived in detail. The predictions obtained with COFFEE as well as results from perturbation theories and empirical mixing rules from the literature are assessed systematically by comparison to the MD results. It is found that the perturbation theories developed solely for the purpose of modeling relative permittivities describe the data accurately, while only one of the empirical mixing rules does so as well. The new extension of COFFEE does not match the MD data as accurately; however, the main deficiencies arise from inaccuracies in the pure-component permittivities, while the general mixing characteristics are predicted correctly in all cases. The largest deviations occur at high densities and dipole moments, where it is known that the approximations in COFFEE lead to deviations in the orientation behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.3c00765\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jced.3c00765","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用分子动力学(MD)模拟对模型流体的二元混合物(即两种不同斯托克迈耶流体的混合物或斯托克迈耶+伦纳德-琼斯混合物)的相对容积进行了全面研究。通过系统地改变分子相互作用参数,使混合物具有非常不同类型的汽液平衡行为。模拟结果表明,与之前研究纯组分的结果一致,这些混合物的相对介电常数也是偶极子强度的单变量函数,它综合了密度、反温度、组分偶极子矩平方和及其分子分数的影响。此外,分子热力学框架 COFFEE 的功能还扩展到对此类混合物的介电常数进行预测性描述。这是通过使用柯克伍德相对介电常数方程和 COFFEE 提供的取向信息(计算柯克伍德因子所必需的)来实现的。详细推导了混合物柯克伍德因子的合适表达式。通过与 MD 结果进行比较,系统地评估了 COFFEE 得出的预测结果以及文献中的扰动理论和经验混合规则得出的结果。结果发现,仅为建立相对介电常数模型而开发的扰动理论能准确地描述数据,而只有一种经验混合规则也能做到这一点。COFFEE 的新扩展与 MD 数据的匹配并不准确;然而,主要的缺陷来自于纯组分容积的不准确性,而一般的混合特性在所有情况下都得到了正确的预测。最大的偏差出现在高密度和偶极矩的情况下,众所周知 COFFEE 的近似值会导致取向行为的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Approaches towards the Relative Permittivity of Mixtures
Relative permittivities of binary mixtures of model fluids, i.e., mixtures of two different Stockmayer fluids or Stockmayer + Lennard-Jones mixtures, are studied comprehensively using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. The molecular interaction parameters are varied systematically in such a way that the mixtures possess very different types of vapor–liquid equilibrium behavior. The simulation results reveal that in line with findings from previous work on pure components, also for these mixtures the relative permittivity is a univariate function of the dipole strength, which combines the influence of density, inverse temperature, the squared dipole moments of the components, and their mole fractions. Furthermore, the capabilities of the molecular thermodynamics framework COFFEE are extended to describing permittivities in such mixtures predictively. This is achieved by using Kirkwood’s equation for the relative permittivity together with the orientational information provided by COFFEE, which is necessary for calculating the Kirkwood factor. A suitable expression for the Kirkwood factor of mixtures is derived in detail. The predictions obtained with COFFEE as well as results from perturbation theories and empirical mixing rules from the literature are assessed systematically by comparison to the MD results. It is found that the perturbation theories developed solely for the purpose of modeling relative permittivities describe the data accurately, while only one of the empirical mixing rules does so as well. The new extension of COFFEE does not match the MD data as accurately; however, the main deficiencies arise from inaccuracies in the pure-component permittivities, while the general mixing characteristics are predicted correctly in all cases. The largest deviations occur at high densities and dipole moments, where it is known that the approximations in COFFEE lead to deviations in the orientation behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data
Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
19.20%
发文量
324
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data is a monthly journal devoted to the publication of data obtained from both experiment and computation, which are viewed as complementary. It is the only American Chemical Society journal primarily concerned with articles containing data on the phase behavior and the physical, thermodynamic, and transport properties of well-defined materials, including complex mixtures of known compositions. While environmental and biological samples are of interest, their compositions must be known and reproducible. As a result, adsorption on natural product materials does not generally fit within the scope of Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data.
期刊最新文献
Advances in CO2 Absorption by Deep Eutectic Solvents Experimental Study on Vapor–Liquid and Solid–Liquid Equilibria Data for the Regeneration of Biobased Solvents Guaiacol and 2,2,5,5-Tetramethyl Oxolane in Biorefinery Processes Thermophysical Properties of 1-Ethyl-3-methylimidazolium Dicyanamide + Water: Understanding Interactions and Structure of Ionic Liquid + Water Systems Liquid−Liquid Equilibrium Data for 1-Butanol–Methylcyclohexane and Acetonitrile–Benzene Mixtures Using Multiple Deep Eutectic Solvents Based on Choline Chloride Solubility Measurement and Thermodynamic Modeling of Bifendate in 13 Pure Solvents at Temperatures from 293.15 to 333.15 K
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1