信任的对象》摘要

Anna Mahtani
{"title":"信任的对象》摘要","authors":"Anna Mahtani","doi":"10.1017/s026626712400004x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>The Objects of Credence</span> grew from a simple insight, which is that credence claims are opaque (or ‘hyperintensional’). This central idea can be illustrated using the following example:</p><ol><li><p><span>(1)</span> Tom has a high credence that George Orwell is a writer.</p></li><li><p><span>(2)</span> Tom has a low credence that Eric Blair is a writer.</p></li></ol><p></p>","PeriodicalId":501336,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Philosophy","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precis of The Objects of Credence\",\"authors\":\"Anna Mahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s026626712400004x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><span>The Objects of Credence</span> grew from a simple insight, which is that credence claims are opaque (or ‘hyperintensional’). This central idea can be illustrated using the following example:</p><ol><li><p><span>(1)</span> Tom has a high credence that George Orwell is a writer.</p></li><li><p><span>(2)</span> Tom has a low credence that Eric Blair is a writer.</p></li></ol><p></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s026626712400004x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s026626712400004x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可信度的对象 "源于一个简单的见解,即可信度主张是不透明的(或 "超内涵")。这个中心思想可以用下面的例子来说明:(1) 汤姆对乔治-奥威尔是作家的可信度很高;(2) 汤姆对埃里克-布莱尔是作家的可信度很低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Precis of The Objects of Credence

The Objects of Credence grew from a simple insight, which is that credence claims are opaque (or ‘hyperintensional’). This central idea can be illustrated using the following example:

  1. (1) Tom has a high credence that George Orwell is a writer.

  2. (2) Tom has a low credence that Eric Blair is a writer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The moral limits of what, exactly? Catastrophe insurance decision making when the science is uncertain Narrowly person-affecting axiology: a reconsideration Unjust equal relations Replies to commentators
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1