退伍军人健康管理局的转诊协调倡议对转诊模式和专科护理等待时间的影响。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14303
Daniel A. Asfaw PhD, Megan E. Price MS, Kristina M. Carvalho MSW, Steven D. Pizer PhD, Melissa M. Garrido PhD
{"title":"退伍军人健康管理局的转诊协调倡议对转诊模式和专科护理等待时间的影响。","authors":"Daniel A. Asfaw PhD,&nbsp;Megan E. Price MS,&nbsp;Kristina M. Carvalho MSW,&nbsp;Steven D. Pizer PhD,&nbsp;Melissa M. Garrido PhD","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate whether the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) 2019 Referral Coordination Initiative (RCI) was associated with changes in the proportion of VA specialty referrals completed by community-based care (CC) providers and mean appointment waiting times for VA and CC providers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Sources/Study Settings</h3>\n \n <p>Monthly facility level VA data for 3,097,366 specialty care referrals for eight high-volume specialties (cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, neurology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, physical therapy, and podiatry) from October 1, 2019 to May 30, 2022.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>We employed a staggered difference-in-differences approach to evaluate RCI's effects on referral patterns and wait times. Our unit of analysis was facility-month. We dichotomized facilities into high and low RCI use based on the proportion of total referrals for a specialty. We stratified our analysis by specialty and the staffing model that high RCI users adopted: centralized, decentralized, and hybrid.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Administrative data on referrals and waiting times were extracted from the VA's corporate data warehouse. Data on staffing models were provided by the VA's Office of Integrated Veteran Care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\n \n <p>We did not reject the null hypotheses that high RCI use do not change CC referral rates or waiting times in any of the care settings for most specialties. For example, high RCI use for physical therapy—the highest volume specialty studied—was associated with −0.054 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.114 to 0.006) and 2.0 days (95% CI: −4.8 to 8.8) change in CC referral rate and waiting time at CC providers, respectively, among centralized staffing model adopters.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In the initial years of the RCI program, RCI does not have a measurable effect on waiting times or CC referral rates. Our findings do not support concerns that RCI might be impeding Veterans' access to CC providers. Future evaluations should examine whether RCI facilitates Veterans' ability to receive care in their preferred setting.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of the Veterans Health Administration's Referral Coordination Initiative on referral patterns and waiting times for specialty care\",\"authors\":\"Daniel A. Asfaw PhD,&nbsp;Megan E. Price MS,&nbsp;Kristina M. Carvalho MSW,&nbsp;Steven D. Pizer PhD,&nbsp;Melissa M. Garrido PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate whether the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) 2019 Referral Coordination Initiative (RCI) was associated with changes in the proportion of VA specialty referrals completed by community-based care (CC) providers and mean appointment waiting times for VA and CC providers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Sources/Study Settings</h3>\\n \\n <p>Monthly facility level VA data for 3,097,366 specialty care referrals for eight high-volume specialties (cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, neurology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, physical therapy, and podiatry) from October 1, 2019 to May 30, 2022.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>We employed a staggered difference-in-differences approach to evaluate RCI's effects on referral patterns and wait times. Our unit of analysis was facility-month. We dichotomized facilities into high and low RCI use based on the proportion of total referrals for a specialty. We stratified our analysis by specialty and the staffing model that high RCI users adopted: centralized, decentralized, and hybrid.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collection/Extraction Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Administrative data on referrals and waiting times were extracted from the VA's corporate data warehouse. Data on staffing models were provided by the VA's Office of Integrated Veteran Care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Principal Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>We did not reject the null hypotheses that high RCI use do not change CC referral rates or waiting times in any of the care settings for most specialties. For example, high RCI use for physical therapy—the highest volume specialty studied—was associated with −0.054 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.114 to 0.006) and 2.0 days (95% CI: −4.8 to 8.8) change in CC referral rate and waiting time at CC providers, respectively, among centralized staffing model adopters.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the initial years of the RCI program, RCI does not have a measurable effect on waiting times or CC referral rates. Our findings do not support concerns that RCI might be impeding Veterans' access to CC providers. Future evaluations should examine whether RCI facilitates Veterans' ability to receive care in their preferred setting.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14303\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的调查退伍军人健康管理局(VA)2019 年转诊协调倡议(RCI)是否与社区医疗服务提供者(CC)完成的退伍军人专科转诊比例变化以及退伍军人健康管理局和社区医疗服务提供者的平均预约等候时间有关:2019年10月1日至2022年5月30日期间,退伍军人事务部每月提供8个高流量专科(心脏病学、皮肤病学、肠胃病学、神经病学、眼科学、整形外科学、理疗学和足病学)的3,097,366次专科转诊的设施级数据:研究设计:我们采用交错差分法来评估 RCI 对转诊模式和等待时间的影响。我们的分析单位是设施月。我们根据某一专科在总转诊量中所占的比例,将医疗机构分为使用 RCI 高的和使用 RCI 低的两类。我们按专科和高RCI用户采用的人员配置模式进行了分层分析:集中式、分散式和混合式:有关转诊和等待时间的管理数据来自退伍军人事务部的企业数据仓库。有关人员配置模式的数据由退伍军人事务部退伍军人综合医疗办公室提供:我们没有否决 "大量使用RCI不会改变CC转诊率或大多数专科护理环境中的等待时间 "的零假设。例如,在采用集中式人员配置模式的医疗机构中,物理治疗(研究中使用量最大的专科)大量使用 RCI 分别与 CC 转诊率和等待时间的-0.054(95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.114 至 0.006)和 2.0 天(95% 置信区间 [CI]:-4.8 至 8.8)变化相关:在实施 RCI 计划的最初几年,RCI 对等待时间或 CC 转诊率没有明显影响。我们的研究结果并不支持 RCI 可能会阻碍退伍军人获得 CC 医疗服务的担忧。未来的评估应研究 RCI 是否有助于退伍军人在自己喜欢的环境中接受治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of the Veterans Health Administration's Referral Coordination Initiative on referral patterns and waiting times for specialty care

Objective

To investigate whether the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) 2019 Referral Coordination Initiative (RCI) was associated with changes in the proportion of VA specialty referrals completed by community-based care (CC) providers and mean appointment waiting times for VA and CC providers.

Data Sources/Study Settings

Monthly facility level VA data for 3,097,366 specialty care referrals for eight high-volume specialties (cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, neurology, ophthalmology, orthopedics, physical therapy, and podiatry) from October 1, 2019 to May 30, 2022.

Study Design

We employed a staggered difference-in-differences approach to evaluate RCI's effects on referral patterns and wait times. Our unit of analysis was facility-month. We dichotomized facilities into high and low RCI use based on the proportion of total referrals for a specialty. We stratified our analysis by specialty and the staffing model that high RCI users adopted: centralized, decentralized, and hybrid.

Data Collection/Extraction Methods

Administrative data on referrals and waiting times were extracted from the VA's corporate data warehouse. Data on staffing models were provided by the VA's Office of Integrated Veteran Care.

Principal Findings

We did not reject the null hypotheses that high RCI use do not change CC referral rates or waiting times in any of the care settings for most specialties. For example, high RCI use for physical therapy—the highest volume specialty studied—was associated with −0.054 (95% confidence interval [CI]: −0.114 to 0.006) and 2.0 days (95% CI: −4.8 to 8.8) change in CC referral rate and waiting time at CC providers, respectively, among centralized staffing model adopters.

Conclusions

In the initial years of the RCI program, RCI does not have a measurable effect on waiting times or CC referral rates. Our findings do not support concerns that RCI might be impeding Veterans' access to CC providers. Future evaluations should examine whether RCI facilitates Veterans' ability to receive care in their preferred setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
International comparison of hospitalizations and emergency department visits related to mental health conditions across high-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Aligning quality improvement, research, and health system goals using the QUERI priority-setting process: A step forward in creating a learning health system. Bridging borders: Current trends and future directions in comparative health systems research. Hospital-physician integration and Medicare spending: Evidence from stable angina. Health system resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A comparative analysis of disruptions in care from 32 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1