基层医疗与钠尿肽:设计改善心力衰竭诊断的医疗流程。

Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102224
J. Cuevas Pérez , D. Moro Quesada , V. Alonso Fernández , M.Á. Prieto-Díaz , B. Prieto García , P. Herrero Puente , V. Chiminazzo , R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero , J.M. de la Hera Galarza
{"title":"基层医疗与钠尿肽:设计改善心力衰竭诊断的医疗流程。","authors":"J. Cuevas Pérez ,&nbsp;D. Moro Quesada ,&nbsp;V. Alonso Fernández ,&nbsp;M.Á. Prieto-Díaz ,&nbsp;B. Prieto García ,&nbsp;P. Herrero Puente ,&nbsp;V. Chiminazzo ,&nbsp;R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero ,&nbsp;J.M. de la Hera Galarza","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->&gt; 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->&gt; 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atención primaria y péptidos natriuréticos: diseño de un proceso asistencial para la mejora en el diagnóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca\",\"authors\":\"J. Cuevas Pérez ,&nbsp;D. Moro Quesada ,&nbsp;V. Alonso Fernández ,&nbsp;M.Á. Prieto-Díaz ,&nbsp;B. Prieto García ,&nbsp;P. Herrero Puente ,&nbsp;V. Chiminazzo ,&nbsp;R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero ,&nbsp;J.M. de la Hera Galarza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->&gt; 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p &lt;<!--> <!-->0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->&gt; 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359324000340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359324000340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言有关在初级医疗(PC)环境中优化使用钠尿肽(NP)的数据很少。材料与方法分析性、实验性、前瞻性、非随机研究。干预组由来自 2 个医疗中心的 22 名 PC 医生组成,他们将接受面对面的培训,并附有一份共识协议,以 NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL 为病理分界点。对照组由医疗保健区的其他 PC 医生组成。目的是比较两组 PN 的使用情况和结果。结果从 2021 年 6 月到 2022 年 3 月,干预组/对照组分别有 103 名和 105 名患者申请了 NP。两组人群相似,高频风险相同。干预组 100% 的患者有症状,对照组 41% 的无症状患者有症状(p < 0.001)。100%的干预组患者与33.3%的对照组患者进行了心电图检查(P< 0.001)。76.7%与29.5%的患者有最佳NP指征,p <0.001。在干预组中,更多 NT-proBNP 为 300 pg/mL 的患者被转至心脏科就诊(76.6% vs 27.2%,p 0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Atención primaria y péptidos natriuréticos: diseño de un proceso asistencial para la mejora en el diagnóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca

Introduction

There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.

Material and methods

Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.

Results

From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p < 0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p < 0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).

Conclusion

The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1