J. Cuevas Pérez , D. Moro Quesada , V. Alonso Fernández , M.Á. Prieto-Díaz , B. Prieto García , P. Herrero Puente , V. Chiminazzo , R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero , J.M. de la Hera Galarza
{"title":"基层医疗与钠尿肽:设计改善心力衰竭诊断的医疗流程。","authors":"J. Cuevas Pérez , D. Moro Quesada , V. Alonso Fernández , M.Á. Prieto-Díaz , B. Prieto García , P. Herrero Puente , V. Chiminazzo , R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero , J.M. de la Hera Galarza","doi":"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->> 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p <<!--> <!-->0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p <<!--> <!-->0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p <<!--> <!-->0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->> 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atención primaria y péptidos natriuréticos: diseño de un proceso asistencial para la mejora en el diagnóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca\",\"authors\":\"J. Cuevas Pérez , D. Moro Quesada , V. Alonso Fernández , M.Á. Prieto-Díaz , B. Prieto García , P. Herrero Puente , V. Chiminazzo , R. Ludeña Martín-Tesorero , J.M. de la Hera Galarza\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.semerg.2024.102224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->> 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p <<!--> <!-->0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p <<!--> <!-->0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p <<!--> <!-->0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP<!--> <!-->> 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359324000340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138359324000340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Atención primaria y péptidos natriuréticos: diseño de un proceso asistencial para la mejora en el diagnóstico de la insuficiencia cardiaca
Introduction
There are few data about the optimal use of natriuretic peptides (NP) in the Primary Care (PC) setting. The aim to assess how, through a common coordinated PC-hospital care pathway, the use of NPs in patients with suspected heart failure (HF) is improved.
Material and methods
Analytical, experimental, prospective, non-randomized study. An intervention group composed of 22 PC physicians from 2 health centers is provided with face-to-face training and a consensual protocol is attached with a cut-off point of NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL as pathological. The control group is made up of the rest of PC physicians in the healthcare area. The aim is to compare the use and results of PN in both groups. Propensity analysis is performed so thar the patient populations with requested PN are comparable.
Results
From June 2021 to March 2022, NP was requested in 103 and 105 patients in the intervention/control groups. Both populations were similar, with equal HF risk. Symptomatology was present in 100% of intervention vs 41% of asymptomatic patients in the control group (p < 0.001). ECG was performed in 100% vs 33.3%, p < 0.001. Optimal NP indication in 76.7% vs 29.5%, p < 0.001. In the intervention group more patients with NT-proBNP > 300 pg/mL are referred to cardiology consultations (76.6% vs 27.2%, p 0.001).
Conclusion
The optimal indication for NP and its interpretation as a diagnostic tool for HF, in the PC setting seems not to be appropriate, but improvable with a coordinated and multidisciplinary intervention approach.