审查 NSDUH 对芬太尼使用情况的评估:2015-2020 年芬太尼使用和芬太尼过量致死趋势比较》。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.15288/jsad.23-00247
James Aluri, Ramin Mojtabai, Eric C Strain
{"title":"审查 NSDUH 对芬太尼使用情况的评估:2015-2020 年芬太尼使用和芬太尼过量致死趋势比较》。","authors":"James Aluri, Ramin Mojtabai, Eric C Strain","doi":"10.15288/jsad.23-00247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), as the primary source of epidemiological substance use data in the United States, could illuminate trends in fentanyl use behaviors contributing to the opioid overdose crisis. We hypothesized that the trend in NSDUH prevalence of lifetime fentanyl injection would match the direction and magnitude of the trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using logistic regression, we modeled the 2015-2020 trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths as a proportion of all deaths. We modeled contemporary trends from cross-sectional NSDUH data for (a) lifetime fentanyl injection, (b) past-year prescription fentanyl misuse, (c) prescription tramadol misuse (the other synthetic opioid counted alongside fentanyl in the overdose deaths category), and (d) combined prescription fentanyl or tramadol misuse. The average annual NSDUH weighted sample size was 272,519,038 (51.5% female, 48.5% male).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthetic opioid overdose deaths increased from 2015 to 2020 (odds ratio = 3.39, meaning that the odds of a death being from synthetic opioid overdose in 2020 were 3.39 times the odds of death from that cause in 2015, 95% CI [3.34, 3.44]). None of the substance use trends significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Per NSDUH data, the prevalence of fentanyl misuse did not significantly increase in tandem with synthetic opioid overdose deaths from 2015 to 2020. Scrutiny of NSDUH's approach to assessing fentanyl misuse casts doubt on the utility of NSDUH fentanyl data collection. We acknowledge recent changes to the survey and recommend two further changes to optimize a vital source of data on behaviors related to the opioid overdose crisis.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":"713-719"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining NSDUH's Assessment of Fentanyl Use: A Comparison of Trends in Fentanyl Use and Fentanyl Overdose Deaths From 2015 to 2020.\",\"authors\":\"James Aluri, Ramin Mojtabai, Eric C Strain\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.23-00247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), as the primary source of epidemiological substance use data in the United States, could illuminate trends in fentanyl use behaviors contributing to the opioid overdose crisis. We hypothesized that the trend in NSDUH prevalence of lifetime fentanyl injection would match the direction and magnitude of the trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using logistic regression, we modeled the 2015-2020 trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths as a proportion of all deaths. We modeled contemporary trends from cross-sectional NSDUH data for (a) lifetime fentanyl injection, (b) past-year prescription fentanyl misuse, (c) prescription tramadol misuse (the other synthetic opioid counted alongside fentanyl in the overdose deaths category), and (d) combined prescription fentanyl or tramadol misuse. The average annual NSDUH weighted sample size was 272,519,038 (51.5% female, 48.5% male).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Synthetic opioid overdose deaths increased from 2015 to 2020 (odds ratio = 3.39, meaning that the odds of a death being from synthetic opioid overdose in 2020 were 3.39 times the odds of death from that cause in 2015, 95% CI [3.34, 3.44]). None of the substance use trends significantly increased.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Per NSDUH data, the prevalence of fentanyl misuse did not significantly increase in tandem with synthetic opioid overdose deaths from 2015 to 2020. Scrutiny of NSDUH's approach to assessing fentanyl misuse casts doubt on the utility of NSDUH fentanyl data collection. We acknowledge recent changes to the survey and recommend two further changes to optimize a vital source of data on behaviors related to the opioid overdose crisis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"713-719\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.23-00247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:全国药物使用和健康调查(NSDUH)是美国流行病学药物使用数据的主要来源,它可以揭示导致阿片类药物过量危机的芬太尼使用行为的趋势。我们假设,NSDUH终生注射芬太尼的流行趋势将与合成阿片类药物过量死亡的趋势方向和幅度相吻合:使用逻辑回归法,我们模拟了 2015-2020 年合成阿片类药物过量死亡人数在所有死亡人数中所占比例的趋势。我们根据 NSDUH 的横截面数据建立了以下方面的当代趋势模型:(1) 终生注射芬太尼;(2) 过去一年滥用处方芬太尼 (PF);(3) 滥用处方曲马多(在过量死亡类别中与芬太尼并列的另一种合成阿片类药物);(4) 处方芬太尼或曲马多的合并滥用。NSDUH 年均加权样本量为 272,519,038 人(51.5% 为女性,48.5% 为男性):合成阿片类药物过量死亡人数在 2015-2020 年间有所增加(OR 3.39,即 2020 年因合成阿片类药物过量死亡的几率是 2015 年因该原因死亡几率的 3.39 倍,95% CI:3.34, 3.44)。物质使用趋势都没有明显增加:根据 NSDUH 的数据,从 2015 年到 2020 年,芬太尼滥用的流行率并没有随着合成阿片类药物过量死亡的增加而明显增加。对 NSDUH 芬太尼滥用评估方法的审查使人们对 NSDUH 芬太尼数据收集的效用产生了怀疑。我们承认最近对调查进行了修改,并建议进一步修改两项内容,以优化与阿片类药物过量危机相关行为的重要数据来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining NSDUH's Assessment of Fentanyl Use: A Comparison of Trends in Fentanyl Use and Fentanyl Overdose Deaths From 2015 to 2020.

Objective: The National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH), as the primary source of epidemiological substance use data in the United States, could illuminate trends in fentanyl use behaviors contributing to the opioid overdose crisis. We hypothesized that the trend in NSDUH prevalence of lifetime fentanyl injection would match the direction and magnitude of the trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths.

Method: Using logistic regression, we modeled the 2015-2020 trend in synthetic opioid overdose deaths as a proportion of all deaths. We modeled contemporary trends from cross-sectional NSDUH data for (a) lifetime fentanyl injection, (b) past-year prescription fentanyl misuse, (c) prescription tramadol misuse (the other synthetic opioid counted alongside fentanyl in the overdose deaths category), and (d) combined prescription fentanyl or tramadol misuse. The average annual NSDUH weighted sample size was 272,519,038 (51.5% female, 48.5% male).

Results: Synthetic opioid overdose deaths increased from 2015 to 2020 (odds ratio = 3.39, meaning that the odds of a death being from synthetic opioid overdose in 2020 were 3.39 times the odds of death from that cause in 2015, 95% CI [3.34, 3.44]). None of the substance use trends significantly increased.

Conclusions: Per NSDUH data, the prevalence of fentanyl misuse did not significantly increase in tandem with synthetic opioid overdose deaths from 2015 to 2020. Scrutiny of NSDUH's approach to assessing fentanyl misuse casts doubt on the utility of NSDUH fentanyl data collection. We acknowledge recent changes to the survey and recommend two further changes to optimize a vital source of data on behaviors related to the opioid overdose crisis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
期刊最新文献
Cannabis and alcohol enforcement strategies across the U.S. Reduced Bitter Taste and Enhanced Appetitive Odor Identification in Individuals at Risk for Alcohol Use Disorder: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014. An Easily Accessible, Semi-Automated Approach to Creating Personalized Normative Feedback and Risk Feedback Graphics. Perspective: Pseudoscience and the Detection of Marijuana-Based Impairment-We Can and Must Do Better. The Evolving Alcohol Landscape: Implications for Public Health and Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1