用于治疗慢性伤口的自体血制品 (ABDP)。

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1752
Allegra L Fierro, Carolyn Foley, Tomer Lagziel, John C Lantis
{"title":"用于治疗慢性伤口的自体血制品 (ABDP)。","authors":"Allegra L Fierro, Carolyn Foley, Tomer Lagziel, John C Lantis","doi":"10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autologous blood-derived therapies have emerged as a unique and promising treatment option for chronic wounds. From whole blood clots to spun-down clot constituents, these therapies are highly versatile and tend to have a lower cost profile, allow for point-of-service preparation, and inherently carry minimal to no risk of rejection or allergic reaction when compared to many alternative cellular and matrix-like products. Subsequently, a diversity of processing systems, devices, and kits have surfaced on the market for preparing autologous blood-derived products (ABDPs) and many have demonstrated preclinical and clinical efficacy in facilitating chronic wound healing. However, not all ABDPs are created equal, and the lack of standardization among product formulations and cell concentrations as well as varying complexities in preparation protocols has led to unreliable substrate viabilities and overall inconsistent conclusions on efficacy. Additionally, external factors, such as the ease of drawing blood, the health of a patient's blood, and the reimbursement landscape have dissuaded some practitioners from incorporating ABDPs into an algorithm of care for recalcitrant wounds. Here, we attempt to categorize ABDPs into \"classes\" and examine their efficacy, advantages, and limitations when used as both a primary therapy and an adjunct for treating chronic wounds as well as comment on some potential considerations that may help gear future product development and application.</p>","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Blood-Derived Products (ABDPs) for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.\",\"authors\":\"Allegra L Fierro, Carolyn Foley, Tomer Lagziel, John C Lantis\",\"doi\":\"10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Autologous blood-derived therapies have emerged as a unique and promising treatment option for chronic wounds. From whole blood clots to spun-down clot constituents, these therapies are highly versatile and tend to have a lower cost profile, allow for point-of-service preparation, and inherently carry minimal to no risk of rejection or allergic reaction when compared to many alternative cellular and matrix-like products. Subsequently, a diversity of processing systems, devices, and kits have surfaced on the market for preparing autologous blood-derived products (ABDPs) and many have demonstrated preclinical and clinical efficacy in facilitating chronic wound healing. However, not all ABDPs are created equal, and the lack of standardization among product formulations and cell concentrations as well as varying complexities in preparation protocols has led to unreliable substrate viabilities and overall inconsistent conclusions on efficacy. Additionally, external factors, such as the ease of drawing blood, the health of a patient's blood, and the reimbursement landscape have dissuaded some practitioners from incorporating ABDPs into an algorithm of care for recalcitrant wounds. Here, we attempt to categorize ABDPs into \\\"classes\\\" and examine their efficacy, advantages, and limitations when used as both a primary therapy and an adjunct for treating chronic wounds as well as comment on some potential considerations that may help gear future product development and application.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical technology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/24.STI.44.WH1752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自体血源性疗法已成为治疗慢性伤口的一种独特而有前途的方法。从全血凝块到纺丝凝块成分,这些疗法用途广泛,成本较低,可在服务点进行制备,与许多替代性细胞和基质类产品相比,排斥或过敏反应的风险极低甚至没有。随后,市场上出现了多种用于制备自体血液衍生产品(ABDPs)的处理系统、设备和试剂盒,其中许多产品在促进慢性伤口愈合方面具有临床前和临床疗效。然而,并非所有 ABDP 都是一样的,产品配方和细胞浓度缺乏标准化,制备方案复杂程度各不相同,导致底物存活率不可靠,总体疗效结论不一致。此外,一些外部因素,如抽血的难易程度、患者血液的健康状况和报销情况等,也阻碍了一些医生将 ABDP 纳入顽固伤口的治疗方案中。在此,我们尝试将 ABDPs 分为不同的 "类别",并研究其作为治疗慢性伤口的主要疗法和辅助疗法时的疗效、优势和局限性,同时对一些潜在的考虑因素进行评论,这些因素可能有助于未来产品的开发和应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Autologous Blood-Derived Products (ABDPs) for the Treatment of Chronic Wounds.

Autologous blood-derived therapies have emerged as a unique and promising treatment option for chronic wounds. From whole blood clots to spun-down clot constituents, these therapies are highly versatile and tend to have a lower cost profile, allow for point-of-service preparation, and inherently carry minimal to no risk of rejection or allergic reaction when compared to many alternative cellular and matrix-like products. Subsequently, a diversity of processing systems, devices, and kits have surfaced on the market for preparing autologous blood-derived products (ABDPs) and many have demonstrated preclinical and clinical efficacy in facilitating chronic wound healing. However, not all ABDPs are created equal, and the lack of standardization among product formulations and cell concentrations as well as varying complexities in preparation protocols has led to unreliable substrate viabilities and overall inconsistent conclusions on efficacy. Additionally, external factors, such as the ease of drawing blood, the health of a patient's blood, and the reimbursement landscape have dissuaded some practitioners from incorporating ABDPs into an algorithm of care for recalcitrant wounds. Here, we attempt to categorize ABDPs into "classes" and examine their efficacy, advantages, and limitations when used as both a primary therapy and an adjunct for treating chronic wounds as well as comment on some potential considerations that may help gear future product development and application.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
期刊最新文献
Robotic Assisted Lapendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ileal Deep Endometriosis. A Case Report and Review of Literature. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. Cardiophrenic Lymph Node Resection Through Abdominal Subxiphoid Approach: Surgical Technique. What Happens to Endometriosis During the Menstrual Cycle? Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Thinner and Less Constrained Polyethylene Inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1