验证预测产业工人不安全行为的自我报告工具的有效性:QEEG 分析。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ERGONOMICS International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249
Mahnaz Shakerian, Mohammad Nami, Mehdi Jahangiri, Jafar Hasanzadeh, Moslem Alimohammadlou, Alireza Choobineh
{"title":"验证预测产业工人不安全行为的自我报告工具的有效性:QEEG 分析。","authors":"Mahnaz Shakerian, Mohammad Nami, Mehdi Jahangiri, Jafar Hasanzadeh, Moslem Alimohammadlou, Alireza Choobineh","doi":"10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> Unsafe behavior (UB) is defined as the likelihood of intentionally or unintentionally deviating from pre-defined plans. This study aims to investigate the validation of a self-report tool for measuring workers' cognitive-based UB using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). <i>Methods.</i> The cognitive-based unsafe behavior questionnaire (CUBQ) was completed by 632 front-line workers in a manufacturing industry to identify differences in the backgrounds of the subjects regarding UBs. Two groups were then selected as extreme groups and QEEG was conducted based on the international 10-20 electrode placement. <i>Results.</i> The mean values of absolute power (AP), alpha/beta ratio (ABR) and alpha/gamma ratio (AGR) from brain oscillations in different regions of the cortex were significantly different between the studied groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, these values were found to be significantly correlated with slips, lapses and mistakes, as measured by certain scales of the CUBQ (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusions.</i> The findings of this study indicated differences in brain oscillation activities among industrial workers with different UB backgrounds. These results confirm the effectiveness of CUBQ as a proactive tool for safety practitioners to predict industrial workers' UBs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47704,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"624-634"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validating the effectiveness of a self-report tool to predict unsafe behavior of industrial workers: a QEEG analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mahnaz Shakerian, Mohammad Nami, Mehdi Jahangiri, Jafar Hasanzadeh, Moslem Alimohammadlou, Alireza Choobineh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Objectives.</i> Unsafe behavior (UB) is defined as the likelihood of intentionally or unintentionally deviating from pre-defined plans. This study aims to investigate the validation of a self-report tool for measuring workers' cognitive-based UB using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). <i>Methods.</i> The cognitive-based unsafe behavior questionnaire (CUBQ) was completed by 632 front-line workers in a manufacturing industry to identify differences in the backgrounds of the subjects regarding UBs. Two groups were then selected as extreme groups and QEEG was conducted based on the international 10-20 electrode placement. <i>Results.</i> The mean values of absolute power (AP), alpha/beta ratio (ABR) and alpha/gamma ratio (AGR) from brain oscillations in different regions of the cortex were significantly different between the studied groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Additionally, these values were found to be significantly correlated with slips, lapses and mistakes, as measured by certain scales of the CUBQ (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <i>Conclusions.</i> The findings of this study indicated differences in brain oscillation activities among industrial workers with different UB backgrounds. These results confirm the effectiveness of CUBQ as a proactive tool for safety practitioners to predict industrial workers' UBs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"624-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2024.2330249","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。不安全行为(UB)被定义为有意或无意偏离预定计划的可能性。本研究旨在调查使用定量脑电图(QEEG)测量工人基于认知的不安全行为的自我报告工具的验证情况。研究方法632 名制造业一线工人填写了基于认知的不安全行为问卷(CUBQ),以确定受试者在不安全行为方面的背景差异。然后选取两组作为极端组,根据国际 10-20 电极放置法进行 QEEG 分析。结果显示研究组之间大脑皮层不同区域大脑振荡的绝对功率(AP)、α/β 比值(ABR)和α/γ 比值(AGR)的平均值存在显著差异(p p 结论:研究结果表明,受试者大脑皮层不同区域大脑振荡的绝对功率(AP)、α/β 比值(ABR)和α/γ 比值(AGR)的平均值存在显著差异。本研究的结果表明,不同 UB 背景的产业工人的大脑振荡活动存在差异。这些结果证实了 CUBQ 作为安全从业人员预测工业工人 UB 的前瞻性工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validating the effectiveness of a self-report tool to predict unsafe behavior of industrial workers: a QEEG analysis.

Objectives. Unsafe behavior (UB) is defined as the likelihood of intentionally or unintentionally deviating from pre-defined plans. This study aims to investigate the validation of a self-report tool for measuring workers' cognitive-based UB using quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). Methods. The cognitive-based unsafe behavior questionnaire (CUBQ) was completed by 632 front-line workers in a manufacturing industry to identify differences in the backgrounds of the subjects regarding UBs. Two groups were then selected as extreme groups and QEEG was conducted based on the international 10-20 electrode placement. Results. The mean values of absolute power (AP), alpha/beta ratio (ABR) and alpha/gamma ratio (AGR) from brain oscillations in different regions of the cortex were significantly different between the studied groups (p < 0.05). Additionally, these values were found to be significantly correlated with slips, lapses and mistakes, as measured by certain scales of the CUBQ (p < 0.05). Conclusions. The findings of this study indicated differences in brain oscillation activities among industrial workers with different UB backgrounds. These results confirm the effectiveness of CUBQ as a proactive tool for safety practitioners to predict industrial workers' UBs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
152
期刊最新文献
Exercises to improve directional sound recognition by visually impaired users heading to the workplace. The impact of safety leadership on safety behaviors of aircraft rescue and firefighting personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic. Determining the effect levels of augmented decent work criteria in sustainable economic development with the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Evaluation of success factors of occupational health and safety management systems with the analytical hierarchy process: the case of ground handling companies in Turkey. Using benevolent leadership to improve safety behaviour in the construction industry: a moderated mediation model of safety knowledge and safety training and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1