Yiming Cheng PhD, Xiaomin Wang PhD, Atalanta Ghosh PhD, Jie Pu PhD, Leonidas N Carayannopoulos MD, PhD, Yan Li PhD
{"title":"基于对复发或难治性急性髓性白血病或骨髓增生异常综合征患者进行的鸡尾酒疗法研究,评估依那西尼由 CYP 介导的药物相互作用。","authors":"Yiming Cheng PhD, Xiaomin Wang PhD, Atalanta Ghosh PhD, Jie Pu PhD, Leonidas N Carayannopoulos MD, PhD, Yan Li PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.2436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As a selective and potent inhibitor targeting the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib obtained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. In vitro investigations demonstrated that enasidenib affects various drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. This current investigation aimed to assess enasidenib on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CYP substrates, including dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 probe drug), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 probe drug), midazolam (CYP3A4 probe drug), omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe drug), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 probe drug), in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. Results showed that following the co-administration of enasidenib (100 mg, once daily) for 28 days, the PK parameters AUC<sub>(0-∞)</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of dextromethorphan increased by 1.37 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.96) and 1.24 (90% CI: 0.94, 1.65)-fold, respectively, compared to dextromethorphan alone. For flurbiprofen, these parameters increased by 1.14 (90%CI: 1.01, 1.29) and 0.97 (90% CI 0.86, 1.08)-fold, respectively, when compared to flurbiprofen alone. Conversely, midazolam exhibited decreases to 0.57 (90% CI 0.34, 0.97) and 0.77 (90% CI 0.39, 1.53)-fold, respectively, in comparison to midazolam alone. The parameters for omeprazole increased by 1.86 (90% CI: 1.33, 2.60) and 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)-fold, respectively, compared to omeprazole alone, while those for pioglitazone decreased to 0.80 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.16)-fold, respectively, in comparison to pioglitazone alone. These findings provide valuable insights into dose recommendations concerning drugs acting as substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2C8 when administered concurrently with enasidenib.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"64 8","pages":"984-992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of CYP-Mediated Drug Interactions for Enasidenib Based on a Cocktail Study in Patients with Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Cheng PhD, Xiaomin Wang PhD, Atalanta Ghosh PhD, Jie Pu PhD, Leonidas N Carayannopoulos MD, PhD, Yan Li PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcph.2436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As a selective and potent inhibitor targeting the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib obtained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. In vitro investigations demonstrated that enasidenib affects various drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. This current investigation aimed to assess enasidenib on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CYP substrates, including dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 probe drug), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 probe drug), midazolam (CYP3A4 probe drug), omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe drug), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 probe drug), in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. Results showed that following the co-administration of enasidenib (100 mg, once daily) for 28 days, the PK parameters AUC<sub>(0-∞)</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of dextromethorphan increased by 1.37 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.96) and 1.24 (90% CI: 0.94, 1.65)-fold, respectively, compared to dextromethorphan alone. For flurbiprofen, these parameters increased by 1.14 (90%CI: 1.01, 1.29) and 0.97 (90% CI 0.86, 1.08)-fold, respectively, when compared to flurbiprofen alone. Conversely, midazolam exhibited decreases to 0.57 (90% CI 0.34, 0.97) and 0.77 (90% CI 0.39, 1.53)-fold, respectively, in comparison to midazolam alone. The parameters for omeprazole increased by 1.86 (90% CI: 1.33, 2.60) and 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)-fold, respectively, compared to omeprazole alone, while those for pioglitazone decreased to 0.80 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.16)-fold, respectively, in comparison to pioglitazone alone. These findings provide valuable insights into dose recommendations concerning drugs acting as substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2C8 when administered concurrently with enasidenib.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\"64 8\",\"pages\":\"984-992\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.2436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
作为一种针对异柠檬酸脱氢酶-2(IDH2)突变蛋白的选择性强效抑制剂,依那西尼于2017年获得美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准,用于治疗IDH2突变的急性髓性白血病(AML)成人患者。体外研究表明,依那西尼会影响多种药物代谢酶和转运体。本研究旨在评估依那西尼对CYP底物药代动力学(PKs)的影响,CYP底物包括右美沙芬(CYP2D6探针药物)、氟比洛芬(CYP2C9探针药物)、咪达唑仑(CYP3A4探针药物)、奥美拉唑(CYP2C19探针药物)和吡格列酮(CYP2C8探针药物)。结果显示,与单独服用右美沙芬相比,联合服用依那西尼(100毫克,每天一次)28天后,右美沙芬的PK参数AUC(0-∞)和Cmax分别增加了1.37倍(90%置信区间(CI):0.96,1.96)和1.24倍(90%置信区间(CI):0.94,1.65)。对于氟比洛芬,与单独使用氟比洛芬相比,这些参数分别增加了 1.14(90%CI:1.01,1.29)倍和 0.97(90%CI:0.86,1.08)倍。相反,与单独使用咪达唑仑相比,咪达唑仑的疗效分别下降到 0.57(90% CI 0.34,0.97)倍和 0.77(90% CI 0.39,1.53)倍。与单独使用奥美拉唑相比,奥美拉唑的参数分别增加了1.86(90% CI:1.33,2.60)倍和1.47(0.93,2.31)倍,而与单独使用吡格列酮相比,吡格列酮的参数分别降至0.80(90% CI:0.62,1.03)倍和0.87(90% CI:0.65,1.16)倍。这些发现为作为CYP2D6、CYP2C9、CYP3A4、CYP2C19和CYP2C8底物的药物与依那西尼同时用药时的剂量建议提供了宝贵的见解。
Assessment of CYP-Mediated Drug Interactions for Enasidenib Based on a Cocktail Study in Patients with Relapse or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome
As a selective and potent inhibitor targeting the isocitrate dehydrogenase-2 (IDH2) mutant protein, enasidenib obtained approval from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017 for adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with an IDH2 mutation. In vitro investigations demonstrated that enasidenib affects various drug metabolic enzymes and transporters. This current investigation aimed to assess enasidenib on the pharmacokinetics (PKs) of CYP substrates, including dextromethorphan (CYP2D6 probe drug), flurbiprofen (CYP2C9 probe drug), midazolam (CYP3A4 probe drug), omeprazole (CYP2C19 probe drug), and pioglitazone (CYP2C8 probe drug), in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome. Results showed that following the co-administration of enasidenib (100 mg, once daily) for 28 days, the PK parameters AUC(0-∞) and Cmax of dextromethorphan increased by 1.37 (90% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.96) and 1.24 (90% CI: 0.94, 1.65)-fold, respectively, compared to dextromethorphan alone. For flurbiprofen, these parameters increased by 1.14 (90%CI: 1.01, 1.29) and 0.97 (90% CI 0.86, 1.08)-fold, respectively, when compared to flurbiprofen alone. Conversely, midazolam exhibited decreases to 0.57 (90% CI 0.34, 0.97) and 0.77 (90% CI 0.39, 1.53)-fold, respectively, in comparison to midazolam alone. The parameters for omeprazole increased by 1.86 (90% CI: 1.33, 2.60) and 1.47 (0.93, 2.31)-fold, respectively, compared to omeprazole alone, while those for pioglitazone decreased to 0.80 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.03) and 0.87 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.16)-fold, respectively, in comparison to pioglitazone alone. These findings provide valuable insights into dose recommendations concerning drugs acting as substrates of CYP2D6, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2C8 when administered concurrently with enasidenib.