设计用于癫痫发作监测的下一代头皮下装置:对现有颅外硬件的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsy Research Pub Date : 2024-03-30 DOI:10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107356
Sabry L. Barlatey , George Kouvas , Aleksander Sobolewski , Andreas Nowacki , Claudio Pollo , Maxime O. Baud
{"title":"设计用于癫痫发作监测的下一代头皮下装置:对现有颅外硬件的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sabry L. Barlatey ,&nbsp;George Kouvas ,&nbsp;Aleksander Sobolewski ,&nbsp;Andreas Nowacki ,&nbsp;Claudio Pollo ,&nbsp;Maxime O. Baud","doi":"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Implantable brain recording and stimulation devices apply to a broad spectrum of conditions, such as epilepsy, movement disorders and depression. For long-term monitoring and neuromodulation in epilepsy patients, future extracranial subscalp implants may offer a promising, less-invasive alternative to intracranial neurotechnologies. To inform the design and assess the safety profile of such next-generation devices, we estimated extracranial complication rates of deep brain stimulation (DBS), cranial peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and existing subscalp EEG devices (sqEEG), as proxy for future implants. Pubmed was searched systematically for DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies from 2000 to February 2024 (48 publications, 7329 patients). We identified seven categories of extracranial adverse events: infection, non-infectious cutaneous complications, lead migration, lead fracture, hardware malfunction, pain and hemato-seroma. We used cohort sizes, demographics and industry funding as metrics to assess risks of bias. An inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for pooled and subgroup meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of extracranial complications reached 14.0%, with infections (4.6%, CI 95% [3.2 – 6.2]), surgical site pain (3.2%, [0.6 – 6.4]) and lead migration (2.6%, [1.0 – 4.4]) as leading causes. Subgroup analysis showed a particularly high incidence of persisting pain following PNS (12.0%, [6.8 – 17.9]) and sqEEG (23.9%, [12.7 – 37.2]) implantation. High rates of lead migration (12.4%, [6.4 – 19.3]) were also identified in the PNS subgroup. Complication analysis of DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies provides a significant opportunity to optimize the safety profile of future implantable subscalp devices for chronic EEG monitoring. Developing such promising technologies must address the risks of infection, surgical site pain, lead migration and skin erosion. A thin and robust design, coupled to a lead-anchoring system, shall enhance the durability and utility of next-generation subscalp implants for long-term EEG monitoring and neuromodulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11914,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsy Research","volume":"202 ","pages":"Article 107356"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000718/pdfft?md5=869d80981b244128a01c179fbfbca2c5&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000718-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing next-generation subscalp devices for seizure monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of established extracranial hardware\",\"authors\":\"Sabry L. Barlatey ,&nbsp;George Kouvas ,&nbsp;Aleksander Sobolewski ,&nbsp;Andreas Nowacki ,&nbsp;Claudio Pollo ,&nbsp;Maxime O. Baud\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Implantable brain recording and stimulation devices apply to a broad spectrum of conditions, such as epilepsy, movement disorders and depression. For long-term monitoring and neuromodulation in epilepsy patients, future extracranial subscalp implants may offer a promising, less-invasive alternative to intracranial neurotechnologies. To inform the design and assess the safety profile of such next-generation devices, we estimated extracranial complication rates of deep brain stimulation (DBS), cranial peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and existing subscalp EEG devices (sqEEG), as proxy for future implants. Pubmed was searched systematically for DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies from 2000 to February 2024 (48 publications, 7329 patients). We identified seven categories of extracranial adverse events: infection, non-infectious cutaneous complications, lead migration, lead fracture, hardware malfunction, pain and hemato-seroma. We used cohort sizes, demographics and industry funding as metrics to assess risks of bias. An inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for pooled and subgroup meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of extracranial complications reached 14.0%, with infections (4.6%, CI 95% [3.2 – 6.2]), surgical site pain (3.2%, [0.6 – 6.4]) and lead migration (2.6%, [1.0 – 4.4]) as leading causes. Subgroup analysis showed a particularly high incidence of persisting pain following PNS (12.0%, [6.8 – 17.9]) and sqEEG (23.9%, [12.7 – 37.2]) implantation. High rates of lead migration (12.4%, [6.4 – 19.3]) were also identified in the PNS subgroup. Complication analysis of DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies provides a significant opportunity to optimize the safety profile of future implantable subscalp devices for chronic EEG monitoring. Developing such promising technologies must address the risks of infection, surgical site pain, lead migration and skin erosion. A thin and robust design, coupled to a lead-anchoring system, shall enhance the durability and utility of next-generation subscalp implants for long-term EEG monitoring and neuromodulation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11914,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"volume\":\"202 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000718/pdfft?md5=869d80981b244128a01c179fbfbca2c5&pid=1-s2.0-S0920121124000718-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000718\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920121124000718","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植入式脑记录和刺激装置适用于多种疾病,如癫痫、运动障碍和抑郁症。对于癫痫患者的长期监测和神经调控,未来的颅外头皮下植入物可能会成为颅内神经技术的一种前景广阔的微创替代方案。为了给此类下一代设备的设计提供信息并评估其安全性,我们估算了脑深部刺激(DBS)、颅内周围神经刺激(PNS)、反应性神经刺激(RNS)和现有头皮下脑电图设备(sqEEG)的颅外并发症发生率,以此作为未来植入物的替代方案。我们在 Pubmed 上系统检索了 2000 年至 2024 年 2 月期间的 DBS、PNS、RNS 和 sqEEG 研究(48 篇出版物,7329 名患者)。我们确定了七类颅外不良事件:感染、非感染性皮肤并发症、导线移位、导线断裂、硬件故障、疼痛和血肿。我们使用队列规模、人口统计学和行业资助作为评估偏倚风险的指标。汇总和亚组荟萃分析采用了反方差异质性模型。颅外并发症的总发生率达到 14.0%,其中感染(4.6%,CI 95% [3.2-6.2])、手术部位疼痛(3.2%,[0.6-6.4])和导线移位(2.6%,[1.0-4.4])是主要原因。亚组分析显示,PNS(12.0%,[6.8 - 17.9])和 sqEEG(23.9%,[12.7 - 37.2])植入术后持续疼痛的发生率特别高。在 PNS 亚组中也发现了较高的导线移位率(12.4%,[6.4 - 19.3])。对 DBS、PNS、RNS 和 sqEEG 研究的并发症分析为优化未来用于慢性脑电图监测的头皮下植入式设备的安全性提供了重要机会。开发此类前景广阔的技术必须解决感染、手术部位疼痛、导线移位和皮肤侵蚀等风险。纤薄而坚固的设计加上导线锚定系统,将提高下一代头皮下植入物用于长期脑电图监测和神经调节的耐用性和实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Designing next-generation subscalp devices for seizure monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis of established extracranial hardware

Implantable brain recording and stimulation devices apply to a broad spectrum of conditions, such as epilepsy, movement disorders and depression. For long-term monitoring and neuromodulation in epilepsy patients, future extracranial subscalp implants may offer a promising, less-invasive alternative to intracranial neurotechnologies. To inform the design and assess the safety profile of such next-generation devices, we estimated extracranial complication rates of deep brain stimulation (DBS), cranial peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), responsive neurostimulation (RNS) and existing subscalp EEG devices (sqEEG), as proxy for future implants. Pubmed was searched systematically for DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies from 2000 to February 2024 (48 publications, 7329 patients). We identified seven categories of extracranial adverse events: infection, non-infectious cutaneous complications, lead migration, lead fracture, hardware malfunction, pain and hemato-seroma. We used cohort sizes, demographics and industry funding as metrics to assess risks of bias. An inverse variance heterogeneity model was used for pooled and subgroup meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of extracranial complications reached 14.0%, with infections (4.6%, CI 95% [3.2 – 6.2]), surgical site pain (3.2%, [0.6 – 6.4]) and lead migration (2.6%, [1.0 – 4.4]) as leading causes. Subgroup analysis showed a particularly high incidence of persisting pain following PNS (12.0%, [6.8 – 17.9]) and sqEEG (23.9%, [12.7 – 37.2]) implantation. High rates of lead migration (12.4%, [6.4 – 19.3]) were also identified in the PNS subgroup. Complication analysis of DBS, PNS, RNS and sqEEG studies provides a significant opportunity to optimize the safety profile of future implantable subscalp devices for chronic EEG monitoring. Developing such promising technologies must address the risks of infection, surgical site pain, lead migration and skin erosion. A thin and robust design, coupled to a lead-anchoring system, shall enhance the durability and utility of next-generation subscalp implants for long-term EEG monitoring and neuromodulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsy Research
Epilepsy Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
143
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Epilepsy Research provides for publication of high quality articles in both basic and clinical epilepsy research, with a special emphasis on translational research that ultimately relates to epilepsy as a human condition. The journal is intended to provide a forum for reporting the best and most rigorous epilepsy research from all disciplines ranging from biophysics and molecular biology to epidemiological and psychosocial research. As such the journal will publish original papers relevant to epilepsy from any scientific discipline and also studies of a multidisciplinary nature. Clinical and experimental research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches to the study of epilepsy and its treatment are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant clinical or experimental relevance, and interest to a multidisciplinary audience in the broad arena of epilepsy. Review articles focused on any topic of epilepsy research will also be considered, but only if they present an exceptionally clear synthesis of current knowledge and future directions of a research area, based on a critical assessment of the available data or on hypotheses that are likely to stimulate more critical thinking and further advances in an area of epilepsy research.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Cannabis use, sleep and mood disturbances among persons with epilepsy – A clinical and polysomnography study from a Canadian tertiary care epilepsy center Evaluating the late seizures of acute encephalopathy with biphasic seizures and late reduced diffusion via monitoring using continuous electroencephalogram Validation of hemispherectomy outcome prediction scale in treatment of medically intractable epilepsy MicroRNAs as potential biomarkers of response to modified Atkins diet in treatment of adults with drug-resistant epilepsy: A proof-of-concept study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1