从先天到后天:感知决策的新视角

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES Current Opinion in Neurobiology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1016/j.conb.2024.102871
Lukas T. Oesch, Michael B. Ryan, Anne K. Churchland
{"title":"从先天到后天:感知决策的新视角","authors":"Lukas T. Oesch,&nbsp;Michael B. Ryan,&nbsp;Anne K. Churchland","doi":"10.1016/j.conb.2024.102871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding how subjects perceive sensory stimuli in their environment and use this information to guide appropriate actions is a major challenge in neuroscience. To study perceptual decision-making in animals, researchers use tasks that either probe spontaneous responses to stimuli (often described as “naturalistic”) or train animals to associate stimuli with experimenter-defined responses. Spontaneous decisions rely on animals’ pre-existing knowledge, while trained tasks offer greater versatility, albeit often at the cost of extensive training. Here, we review emerging approaches to investigate perceptual decision-making using both spontaneous and trained behaviors, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Additionally, we propose how trained decision-making tasks could be improved to achieve faster learning and a more generalizable understanding of task rules.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10999,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurobiology","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102871"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438824000333/pdfft?md5=a817c764c67c70cccf6239d41cef65d2&pid=1-s2.0-S0959438824000333-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From innate to instructed: A new look at perceptual decision-making\",\"authors\":\"Lukas T. Oesch,&nbsp;Michael B. Ryan,&nbsp;Anne K. Churchland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.conb.2024.102871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Understanding how subjects perceive sensory stimuli in their environment and use this information to guide appropriate actions is a major challenge in neuroscience. To study perceptual decision-making in animals, researchers use tasks that either probe spontaneous responses to stimuli (often described as “naturalistic”) or train animals to associate stimuli with experimenter-defined responses. Spontaneous decisions rely on animals’ pre-existing knowledge, while trained tasks offer greater versatility, albeit often at the cost of extensive training. Here, we review emerging approaches to investigate perceptual decision-making using both spontaneous and trained behaviors, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Additionally, we propose how trained decision-making tasks could be improved to achieve faster learning and a more generalizable understanding of task rules.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438824000333/pdfft?md5=a817c764c67c70cccf6239d41cef65d2&pid=1-s2.0-S0959438824000333-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438824000333\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959438824000333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

了解研究对象如何感知环境中的感官刺激并利用这些信息指导适当的行动是神经科学领域的一大挑战。为了研究动物的感知决策,研究人员使用的任务要么是探究动物对刺激的自发反应(通常被称为 "自然主义"),要么是训练动物将刺激与实验者定义的反应联系起来。自发决策依赖于动物已有的知识,而训练任务则提供了更大的通用性,尽管往往要付出大量训练的代价。在此,我们回顾了利用自发行为和训练行为研究知觉决策的新方法,并强调了它们的优势和局限性。此外,我们还提出了如何改进训练决策任务,以实现更快的学习速度和对任务规则更普遍的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From innate to instructed: A new look at perceptual decision-making

Understanding how subjects perceive sensory stimuli in their environment and use this information to guide appropriate actions is a major challenge in neuroscience. To study perceptual decision-making in animals, researchers use tasks that either probe spontaneous responses to stimuli (often described as “naturalistic”) or train animals to associate stimuli with experimenter-defined responses. Spontaneous decisions rely on animals’ pre-existing knowledge, while trained tasks offer greater versatility, albeit often at the cost of extensive training. Here, we review emerging approaches to investigate perceptual decision-making using both spontaneous and trained behaviors, highlighting their strengths and limitations. Additionally, we propose how trained decision-making tasks could be improved to achieve faster learning and a more generalizable understanding of task rules.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Current Opinion in Neurobiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.80%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Neurobiology publishes short annotated reviews by leading experts on recent developments in the field of neurobiology. These experts write short reviews describing recent discoveries in this field (in the past 2-5 years), as well as highlighting select individual papers of particular significance. The journal is thus an important resource allowing researchers and educators to quickly gain an overview and rich understanding of complex and current issues in the field of Neurobiology. The journal takes a unique and valuable approach in focusing each special issue around a topic of scientific and/or societal interest, and then bringing together leading international experts studying that topic, embracing diverse methodologies and perspectives. Journal Content: The journal consists of 6 issues per year, covering 8 recurring topics every other year in the following categories: -Neurobiology of Disease- Neurobiology of Behavior- Cellular Neuroscience- Systems Neuroscience- Developmental Neuroscience- Neurobiology of Learning and Plasticity- Molecular Neuroscience- Computational Neuroscience
期刊最新文献
CAMK2; four genes, one syndrome? Delineation of genotype–phenotype correlations Roles of ANK2/ankyrin-B in neurodevelopmental disorders: Isoform functions and implications for autism spectrum disorder and epilepsy The convoluted path leading to neuronal circuit formation New insights into the molecular architecture of neurons by cryo-electron tomography Turning garbage into gold: Autophagy in synaptic function
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1