教育研究与实践之间的互动:合作、策略和条件

Katrijn Opstoel , Edwin Buijs , Janneke van der Steen , Wouter Schenke , Wilfried Admiraal , Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand
{"title":"教育研究与实践之间的互动:合作、策略和条件","authors":"Katrijn Opstoel ,&nbsp;Edwin Buijs ,&nbsp;Janneke van der Steen ,&nbsp;Wouter Schenke ,&nbsp;Wilfried Admiraal ,&nbsp;Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to gain insight in knowledge mobilization (KM) in educational research, focusing on the type of collaboration, the strategies and the conditions. KM reflects the interaction and relationship between educational research and practice and requires specific effort over time. We studied 69 research reports and held 12 group interviews with consortia of researchers and teachers. Results show that the research projects could be characterized as researcher-directed or school-and- researcher directed collaboration. Strategies for KM found in these collaborations were mainly ‘transferring’ and ‘implementing’. ‘Co-creation’ as a strategy was found more often in school- and researcher collaboration projects. Finally, the conditions enabling or constraining KM were found at the level of research knowledge, the individual teacher and researcher, school organization, research organization, consortium, and communication. Implications for future research are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000372/pdfft?md5=930b1dc50c88f459b64d9d4c578833d7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000372-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction between educational research and practice: Collaboration, strategies and conditions\",\"authors\":\"Katrijn Opstoel ,&nbsp;Edwin Buijs ,&nbsp;Janneke van der Steen ,&nbsp;Wouter Schenke ,&nbsp;Wilfried Admiraal ,&nbsp;Helma Oolbekkink-Marchand\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to gain insight in knowledge mobilization (KM) in educational research, focusing on the type of collaboration, the strategies and the conditions. KM reflects the interaction and relationship between educational research and practice and requires specific effort over time. We studied 69 research reports and held 12 group interviews with consortia of researchers and teachers. Results show that the research projects could be characterized as researcher-directed or school-and- researcher directed collaboration. Strategies for KM found in these collaborations were mainly ‘transferring’ and ‘implementing’. ‘Co-creation’ as a strategy was found more often in school- and researcher collaboration projects. Finally, the conditions enabling or constraining KM were found at the level of research knowledge, the individual teacher and researcher, school organization, research organization, consortium, and communication. Implications for future research are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100355\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000372/pdfft?md5=930b1dc50c88f459b64d9d4c578833d7&pid=1-s2.0-S2666374024000372-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of educational research open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在深入了解教育研究中的知识动员(KM),重点关注合作类型、策略和条件。知识管理反映了教育研究与实践之间的互动和关系,需要长期的具体努力。我们研究了 69 份研究报告,并与研究人员和教师联盟进行了 12 次小组访谈。结果表明,这些研究项目可分为研究者指导型合作和学校与研究者指导型合作。在这些合作中发现的知识管理策略主要是 "转让 "和 "实施"。在学校和研究人员合作项目中,"共同创造 "作为一种策略出现的频率更高。最后,在研究知识、教师和研究人员个人、学校组织、研究组织、联合体和交流等层面发现了促进或制约知识管理的条件。讨论了未来研究的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interaction between educational research and practice: Collaboration, strategies and conditions

The aim of this study was to gain insight in knowledge mobilization (KM) in educational research, focusing on the type of collaboration, the strategies and the conditions. KM reflects the interaction and relationship between educational research and practice and requires specific effort over time. We studied 69 research reports and held 12 group interviews with consortia of researchers and teachers. Results show that the research projects could be characterized as researcher-directed or school-and- researcher directed collaboration. Strategies for KM found in these collaborations were mainly ‘transferring’ and ‘implementing’. ‘Co-creation’ as a strategy was found more often in school- and researcher collaboration projects. Finally, the conditions enabling or constraining KM were found at the level of research knowledge, the individual teacher and researcher, school organization, research organization, consortium, and communication. Implications for future research are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
期刊最新文献
Resilience in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping literature review with implications for evidence-informed policymaking Effectiveness of a locally developed cultural responsiveness tool for Australian teachers. Pre-service english teachers’ perceptions of language assessment in a colombian language teacher education program Promoting a restorative culture in schools: Insights from school leaders Emotional exhaustion faced by Italian female teaching staff during COVID-19 pandemic: A sequential mediation model applying coping strategies, self-efficacy for online teaching, and technostress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1