简要报告:免疫检查点抑制剂在局部晚期 NSCLC 患者中的临床疗效与输注时机有关

Tsuyoshi Hirata MD , Yuji Uehara MD , Taiki Hakozaki MD , Takayuki Kobayashi MD , Yuto Terashima MD , Kageaki Watanabe MD , Makiko Yomota MD, PhD , Yukio Hosomi MD, PhD
{"title":"简要报告:免疫检查点抑制剂在局部晚期 NSCLC 患者中的临床疗效与输注时机有关","authors":"Tsuyoshi Hirata MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Uehara MD ,&nbsp;Taiki Hakozaki MD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Kobayashi MD ,&nbsp;Yuto Terashima MD ,&nbsp;Kageaki Watanabe MD ,&nbsp;Makiko Yomota MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukio Hosomi MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies reported an association between immune checkpoint inhibitor infusion timing and the treatment effect in metastatic NSCLC. The present study assessed the association between durvalumab infusion timing and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed, and the association of the proportion of durvalumab infusions greater than or equal to 20% versus less than 20% after 3 <span>PM</span> with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 82 patients were included, with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range, 62–74 years); of these, 67 patients (82%) were of male sex, and 78 patients (95%) had a history of smoking. The median number of durvalumab infusions per patient was 16 (interquartile range, 8–24). Patients with at least 20% of their durvalumab infusions after 3 <span>PM</span> (n = 12/82, 15%) had a significantly shorter PFS than those who did not (median: 7.4 mo versus not available [NA]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–5.34, <em>p</em> = 0.027), whereas overall survival was shorter among the former compared with the latter group (median: 22.4 versus NA; HR, 1.80; 95% CI: 0.73–4.42, <em>p</em> = 0.20). In addition, both backward stepwise multivariable analysis and propensity score–matching analysis revealed that receiving at least 20% of durvalumab infusions after 3 <span>PM</span> was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 2.54; 95% CI: 1.03–5.67, <em>p</em> = 0.047; and HR, 4.64; 95% CI: 1.95–11.04; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The time of day of durvalumab infusions may impact survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000298/pdfft?md5=d84cbc04706013262d06e8a2bc481903&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000298-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Report: Clinical Outcomes by Infusion Timing of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Locally Advanced NSCLC\",\"authors\":\"Tsuyoshi Hirata MD ,&nbsp;Yuji Uehara MD ,&nbsp;Taiki Hakozaki MD ,&nbsp;Takayuki Kobayashi MD ,&nbsp;Yuto Terashima MD ,&nbsp;Kageaki Watanabe MD ,&nbsp;Makiko Yomota MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yukio Hosomi MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Previous studies reported an association between immune checkpoint inhibitor infusion timing and the treatment effect in metastatic NSCLC. The present study assessed the association between durvalumab infusion timing and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed, and the association of the proportion of durvalumab infusions greater than or equal to 20% versus less than 20% after 3 <span>PM</span> with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 82 patients were included, with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range, 62–74 years); of these, 67 patients (82%) were of male sex, and 78 patients (95%) had a history of smoking. The median number of durvalumab infusions per patient was 16 (interquartile range, 8–24). Patients with at least 20% of their durvalumab infusions after 3 <span>PM</span> (n = 12/82, 15%) had a significantly shorter PFS than those who did not (median: 7.4 mo versus not available [NA]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–5.34, <em>p</em> = 0.027), whereas overall survival was shorter among the former compared with the latter group (median: 22.4 versus NA; HR, 1.80; 95% CI: 0.73–4.42, <em>p</em> = 0.20). In addition, both backward stepwise multivariable analysis and propensity score–matching analysis revealed that receiving at least 20% of durvalumab infusions after 3 <span>PM</span> was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 2.54; 95% CI: 1.03–5.67, <em>p</em> = 0.047; and HR, 4.64; 95% CI: 1.95–11.04; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The time of day of durvalumab infusions may impact survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000298/pdfft?md5=d84cbc04706013262d06e8a2bc481903&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000298-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JTO Clinical and Research Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言先前的研究报道了免疫检查点抑制剂输注时机与转移性NSCLC治疗效果之间的关系。本研究评估了局部晚期NSCLC患者输注durvalumab的时间与生存结果之间的关系。方法回顾性分析了在一家机构接受化放疗后输注durvalumab的局部晚期NSCLC患者,并评估了下午3点后输注durvalumab的比例大于或等于20%与小于20%与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期之间的关系。结果 共纳入82名患者,中位年龄为69岁(四分位间范围为62-74岁);其中67名患者(82%)为男性,78名患者(95%)有吸烟史。每位患者的杜伐单抗输注次数中位数为16次(四分位间范围为8-24次)。下午 3 点后输注至少 20% 杜伐单抗的患者(n = 12/82,15%)的 PFS 明显短于未在下午 3 点后输注杜伐单抗的患者(中位数为 7.4 个月,无数据):中位数:7.4 个月,而无数据[NA];危险比[HR],2.43;95% 置信区间[CI]:1.11-5.34,p = 0.027),而前者的总生存期比后者短(中位数:22.4 个月比 NA;HR,1.80;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.73-4.42,p = 0.20)。此外,后向逐步多变量分析和倾向得分匹配分析均显示,在下午3点后接受至少20%的杜伐单抗输注与较差的PFS显著相关(HR,2.54;95% CI:1.03-5.67,p = 0.047;HR,4.64;95% CI:1.95-11.04;p <0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Brief Report: Clinical Outcomes by Infusion Timing of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Locally Advanced NSCLC

Introduction

Previous studies reported an association between immune checkpoint inhibitor infusion timing and the treatment effect in metastatic NSCLC. The present study assessed the association between durvalumab infusion timing and survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Methods

Patients receiving durvalumab after chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed, and the association of the proportion of durvalumab infusions greater than or equal to 20% versus less than 20% after 3 PM with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival was assessed.

Results

A total of 82 patients were included, with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range, 62–74 years); of these, 67 patients (82%) were of male sex, and 78 patients (95%) had a history of smoking. The median number of durvalumab infusions per patient was 16 (interquartile range, 8–24). Patients with at least 20% of their durvalumab infusions after 3 PM (n = 12/82, 15%) had a significantly shorter PFS than those who did not (median: 7.4 mo versus not available [NA]; hazard ratio [HR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11–5.34, p = 0.027), whereas overall survival was shorter among the former compared with the latter group (median: 22.4 versus NA; HR, 1.80; 95% CI: 0.73–4.42, p = 0.20). In addition, both backward stepwise multivariable analysis and propensity score–matching analysis revealed that receiving at least 20% of durvalumab infusions after 3 PM was significantly associated with worse PFS (HR, 2.54; 95% CI: 1.03–5.67, p = 0.047; and HR, 4.64; 95% CI: 1.95–11.04; p < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusions

The time of day of durvalumab infusions may impact survival outcomes in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Radiotherapy Improves Survival in NSCLC After Oligoprogression on Immunotherapy: A Cohort Study Analysis of Baseline Molecular Factors Associated With the Risk of Central Nervous System Progression Among Alectinib-Treated Patients With ALK–Positive NSCLC Regarding: “Olloni A, et al. Heart and Lung Dose as Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer. A National Multicenter Study” Synchronous Oligometastasis and Oligoprogression as a Prognostic Marker in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC Treated With a Combination of Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitor and Chemotherapy (HOT2301) The Whole Picture of First-Line Osimertinib for EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced NSCLC: Real-World Efficacy, Safety, Progression Pattern, and Posttreatment Therapy (Reiwa Study)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1