cN0 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的前哨淋巴结活检:HER2阳性状态对生存期的影响。

Juan Alors-Ruiz, Salomé Sanz-Viedma, Francisco Javier Fernández-Garcia, F. Sendra-Portero
{"title":"cN0 乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的前哨淋巴结活检:HER2阳性状态对生存期的影响。","authors":"Juan Alors-Ruiz, Salomé Sanz-Viedma, Francisco Javier Fernández-Garcia, F. Sendra-Portero","doi":"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-11-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective\nHigh rates of negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have been described. These results are associated with triple-negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) subtypes achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). This study evaluates predictive variables and survival in order to assess the possible omission of SLNB after NAC.\n\n\nMaterials and Methods\nProspective study of women with cN0 BC treated with NAC and subsequent surgery, between April 2010 and May 2021. SLNB technique included, performing axillary lymphadenectomy in the absence of detection or SLNB-positivity. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis of NAC-response and SLNB-results in molecular subtypes: HR-/HER2+, TNBC, HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+. Kaplan-Meyer and log-rank were used for survival analysis.\n\n\nResults\nA total of 179 patients (50.5±10.1 years) were included. Of these, 39.7% achieved pCR (ypT0/Tis). HR-negative subtypes had higher pCR rates (HR-/HER2+: 59.4%; TNBC: 53.4%), with no cases of SLNB-positive. With residual disease, HR-/HER2+ and TNBC showed low rates of SLNB-positivity (6.7% and 10.3%) versus HR+ (HR+/HER2+: 20%; HR+/HER2-: 44%; p<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified independent predictors of SLNB-negativity (p<0.0001) to be: HR- [odds ratio (OR)=0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.37; p = 0.0001], HER2+ (OR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.14-0.81; p = 0.015) and high-grade Nottingham (OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.99; p = 0.048). Disease-free survival showed worse outcomes with SLNB-positivity (p<0.0001), HR+/HER2- (p = 0.0277), larger tumor size (p = 0.002) and residual disease after NAC (p<0.0001).\n\n\nConclusion\nPatient selection based on NAC response, molecular subtype, and survival outcomes is a priority for establishing individualized therapeutic strategies after NAC. Molecular subtypes with higher pCR rates and lower rates of SLNB-positivity could benefit from non-invasive strategies that include omission of SLNB.","PeriodicalId":93996,"journal":{"name":"European journal of breast health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in cN0 Breast Cancer: Impact of HER2-Positive Status on Survival.\",\"authors\":\"Juan Alors-Ruiz, Salomé Sanz-Viedma, Francisco Javier Fernández-Garcia, F. Sendra-Portero\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-11-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective\\nHigh rates of negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have been described. These results are associated with triple-negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) subtypes achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). This study evaluates predictive variables and survival in order to assess the possible omission of SLNB after NAC.\\n\\n\\nMaterials and Methods\\nProspective study of women with cN0 BC treated with NAC and subsequent surgery, between April 2010 and May 2021. SLNB technique included, performing axillary lymphadenectomy in the absence of detection or SLNB-positivity. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis of NAC-response and SLNB-results in molecular subtypes: HR-/HER2+, TNBC, HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+. Kaplan-Meyer and log-rank were used for survival analysis.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nA total of 179 patients (50.5±10.1 years) were included. Of these, 39.7% achieved pCR (ypT0/Tis). HR-negative subtypes had higher pCR rates (HR-/HER2+: 59.4%; TNBC: 53.4%), with no cases of SLNB-positive. With residual disease, HR-/HER2+ and TNBC showed low rates of SLNB-positivity (6.7% and 10.3%) versus HR+ (HR+/HER2+: 20%; HR+/HER2-: 44%; p<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified independent predictors of SLNB-negativity (p<0.0001) to be: HR- [odds ratio (OR)=0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.37; p = 0.0001], HER2+ (OR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.14-0.81; p = 0.015) and high-grade Nottingham (OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.99; p = 0.048). Disease-free survival showed worse outcomes with SLNB-positivity (p<0.0001), HR+/HER2- (p = 0.0277), larger tumor size (p = 0.002) and residual disease after NAC (p<0.0001).\\n\\n\\nConclusion\\nPatient selection based on NAC response, molecular subtype, and survival outcomes is a priority for establishing individualized therapeutic strategies after NAC. Molecular subtypes with higher pCR rates and lower rates of SLNB-positivity could benefit from non-invasive strategies that include omission of SLNB.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal of breast health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"0\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-11-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of breast health","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-11-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的有报道称,临床结节阴性(cN0)乳腺癌(BC)在接受新辅助化疗(NAC)后,前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)的阴性率很高。这些结果与三阴性(TNBC)和人表皮生长因子受体 2(HER2+)亚型获得病理完全反应(pCR)有关。本研究评估了预测变量和生存率,以评估在 NAC 后是否可能省略 SLNB。材料和方法对 2010 年 4 月至 2021 年 5 月间接受 NAC 治疗和后续手术的 cN0 BC 女性患者进行的前瞻性研究。包括 SLNB 技术,在未检测到或 SLNB 阳性的情况下进行腋窝淋巴结切除术。多变量逻辑回归用于分析分子亚型的NAC反应和SLNB结果:HR-/HER2+、TNBC、HR+/HER2-和HR+/HER2+。结果 共纳入 179 例患者(50.5±10.1 岁)。其中,39.7%的患者获得了pCR(ypT0/Tis)。HR阴性亚型的pCR率更高(HR-/HER2+:59.4%;TNBC:53.4%),没有SLNB阳性病例。对于残留疾病,HR-/HER2+和TNBC的SLNB阳性率(6.7%和10.3%)低于HR+(HR+/HER2+:20%;HR+/HER2-:44%;P<0.001)。多变量分析确定了SLNB阴性的独立预测因素(p<0.0001):HR-[几率比 (OR)=0.15; 95% 置信区间 (CI): 0.06-0.37; p = 0.0001]、HER2+(OR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.14-0.81; p = 0.015)和高级别诺丁汉(OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.99; p = 0.048)。无病生存率显示,SLNB阳性(p<0.0001)、HR+/HER2-(p = 0.0277)、肿瘤体积较大(p = 0.002)和NAC后残留疾病(p<0.0001)的结果更差。pCR率较高、SLNB阳性率较低的分子亚型可从包括省略SLNB在内的无创策略中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in cN0 Breast Cancer: Impact of HER2-Positive Status on Survival.
Objective High rates of negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0) breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) have been described. These results are associated with triple-negative (TNBC) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) subtypes achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). This study evaluates predictive variables and survival in order to assess the possible omission of SLNB after NAC. Materials and Methods Prospective study of women with cN0 BC treated with NAC and subsequent surgery, between April 2010 and May 2021. SLNB technique included, performing axillary lymphadenectomy in the absence of detection or SLNB-positivity. Multivariable logistic regression was used for analysis of NAC-response and SLNB-results in molecular subtypes: HR-/HER2+, TNBC, HR+/HER2- and HR+/HER2+. Kaplan-Meyer and log-rank were used for survival analysis. Results A total of 179 patients (50.5±10.1 years) were included. Of these, 39.7% achieved pCR (ypT0/Tis). HR-negative subtypes had higher pCR rates (HR-/HER2+: 59.4%; TNBC: 53.4%), with no cases of SLNB-positive. With residual disease, HR-/HER2+ and TNBC showed low rates of SLNB-positivity (6.7% and 10.3%) versus HR+ (HR+/HER2+: 20%; HR+/HER2-: 44%; p<0.001). Multivariable analysis identified independent predictors of SLNB-negativity (p<0.0001) to be: HR- [odds ratio (OR)=0.15; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.06-0.37; p = 0.0001], HER2+ (OR=0.34; 95% CI: 0.14-0.81; p = 0.015) and high-grade Nottingham (OR=0.42; 95% CI: 0.18-0.99; p = 0.048). Disease-free survival showed worse outcomes with SLNB-positivity (p<0.0001), HR+/HER2- (p = 0.0277), larger tumor size (p = 0.002) and residual disease after NAC (p<0.0001). Conclusion Patient selection based on NAC response, molecular subtype, and survival outcomes is a priority for establishing individualized therapeutic strategies after NAC. Molecular subtypes with higher pCR rates and lower rates of SLNB-positivity could benefit from non-invasive strategies that include omission of SLNB.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Breast Health Promotion Intervention Among Catholic Nuns in Lake Zone 'Tanzania. Turmeric Inhibits MDA-MB-231 Cancer Cell Proliferation, Altering miR-638-5p and Its Potential Targets. The Relationship of Pathological Response and Visceral Muscle and Fat Volume in Women With Breast Cancer Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Histopathological Features Predicting Neuroendocrine Morphology in Primary Breast Tumors: A Retrospective Analysis. Radiomics Analysis of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI for Optimized Modelling of Virtual Prognostic Biomarkers in Breast Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1