核心稳定运动对非特异性腰痛患者的影响:胡贝尔运动实验室与传统

IF 0.7 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-03-31 DOI:10.29359/bjhpa.16.1.08
Ebru Koyuncu, Nur Tunali, S. Saka, Ertuğrul Ural, M. Yavuzer
{"title":"核心稳定运动对非特异性腰痛患者的影响:胡贝尔运动实验室与传统","authors":"Ebru Koyuncu, Nur Tunali, S. Saka, Ertuğrul Ural, M. Yavuzer","doi":"10.29359/bjhpa.16.1.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of core stabilization exercises with Huber® Motion Lab on pain, depression, and activity levels in patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Materials and methods: In this study, 30 patients with non-specific LBP were allocated either to an experimental or to a control group. Both groups received a conventional physiotherapy program for 15 sessions. In addition, the control group performed 30 minutes of core stabilization exercises on the floor, whereas the experimental group used the Huber® Motion Lab device. The main outcome measures were pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale VAS), depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI), and disability level (Oswestry Disability Index ODI) that were performed on the first and the last day of the program. Results: At the end of the program, all outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). Between-group comparison of mean change score revealed significantly greater improvements regarding VAS (7.40vs4.23), BDI (29.52vs13.81), and ODI score (51.78vs25.29) for the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients in this study with non-specific LBP, both with and without Huber® Motion Lab, core stabilization exercises in addition to a physiotherapy program were beneficial in terms of pain severity, depression, and disability level in favor of Huber® Motion Lab.","PeriodicalId":43798,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of core stabilization exercises in patients with non-specific low back pain: Huber Motion Lab versus conventional\",\"authors\":\"Ebru Koyuncu, Nur Tunali, S. Saka, Ertuğrul Ural, M. Yavuzer\",\"doi\":\"10.29359/bjhpa.16.1.08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of core stabilization exercises with Huber® Motion Lab on pain, depression, and activity levels in patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Materials and methods: In this study, 30 patients with non-specific LBP were allocated either to an experimental or to a control group. Both groups received a conventional physiotherapy program for 15 sessions. In addition, the control group performed 30 minutes of core stabilization exercises on the floor, whereas the experimental group used the Huber® Motion Lab device. The main outcome measures were pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale VAS), depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI), and disability level (Oswestry Disability Index ODI) that were performed on the first and the last day of the program. Results: At the end of the program, all outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). Between-group comparison of mean change score revealed significantly greater improvements regarding VAS (7.40vs4.23), BDI (29.52vs13.81), and ODI score (51.78vs25.29) for the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients in this study with non-specific LBP, both with and without Huber® Motion Lab, core stabilization exercises in addition to a physiotherapy program were beneficial in terms of pain severity, depression, and disability level in favor of Huber® Motion Lab.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.16.1.08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Health and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29359/bjhpa.16.1.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介本研究旨在确定使用 Huber® 运动实验室进行核心稳定训练对非特异性腰背痛(LBP)患者的疼痛、抑郁和活动水平的影响。材料和方法在这项研究中,30 名非特异性腰背痛患者被分配到实验组或对照组。两组患者都接受了为期 15 次的常规物理治疗。此外,对照组在地板上进行 30 分钟的核心稳定练习,而实验组则使用 Huber® 运动实验室设备。主要结果指标为疼痛严重程度(视觉模拟量表 VAS)、抑郁程度(贝克抑郁量表 BDI)和残疾程度(Oswestry 残疾指数 ODI),分别在疗程第一天和最后一天进行。结果显示项目结束时,两组的所有结果指标均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。组间平均变化分数比较显示,与对照组相比,实验组的 VAS(7.40vs4.23)、BDI(29.52vs13.81)和 ODI 分数(51.78vs25.29)均有明显改善(P < 0.001)。结论对于本研究中患有非特异性腰椎间盘突出症的患者,无论是使用还是未使用 Huber® 运动实验室,在物理治疗计划之外进行核心稳定训练对疼痛严重程度、抑郁和残疾程度都有好处,而 Huber® 运动实验室更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of core stabilization exercises in patients with non-specific low back pain: Huber Motion Lab versus conventional
Introduction: This study aimed to determine the effects of core stabilization exercises with Huber® Motion Lab on pain, depression, and activity levels in patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Materials and methods: In this study, 30 patients with non-specific LBP were allocated either to an experimental or to a control group. Both groups received a conventional physiotherapy program for 15 sessions. In addition, the control group performed 30 minutes of core stabilization exercises on the floor, whereas the experimental group used the Huber® Motion Lab device. The main outcome measures were pain severity (Visual Analogue Scale VAS), depression (Beck Depression Inventory BDI), and disability level (Oswestry Disability Index ODI) that were performed on the first and the last day of the program. Results: At the end of the program, all outcome measures improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001). Between-group comparison of mean change score revealed significantly greater improvements regarding VAS (7.40vs4.23), BDI (29.52vs13.81), and ODI score (51.78vs25.29) for the experimental group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: For patients in this study with non-specific LBP, both with and without Huber® Motion Lab, core stabilization exercises in addition to a physiotherapy program were beneficial in terms of pain severity, depression, and disability level in favor of Huber® Motion Lab.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊最新文献
Benefits of Pilates exercises on functional fitness and quality of life in older men: A quasi-experimental study Effects of core stabilization exercises in patients with non-specific low back pain: Huber Motion Lab versus conventional Relationship between functional movement screen scores and postural stability in football players: An asymmetrical approach Adaptive changes in young football players working in a modified tactical periodization model based on the example of endurance Gait analysis of male professional boxers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1