眼肌萎缩症的甲基强的松龙静脉注射疗法:一项回顾性研究

IF 0.4 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1111/ncn3.12810
S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito
{"title":"眼肌萎缩症的甲基强的松龙静脉注射疗法:一项回顾性研究","authors":"S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito","doi":"10.1111/ncn3.12810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.","PeriodicalId":19154,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ncn3.12810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管静脉甲基强的松龙脉冲(IVMP)疗法已被推荐用于眼肌萎缩症(OMG),但证据有限。IVMP治疗组和非IVMP治疗组的疗效通过∆眼部定量MG(QMG)评分和∆眼部MG日常生活活动档案(MG-ADL)评分(即用药1个月前后的评分差异)以及美国肌无力基金会干预后1、3、6和12个月的状况来确定。26名OMG患者中有13人接受了IVMP和随后的低剂量免疫疗法。IVMP组的∆眼QMG和∆眼MG-ADL评分分别为3(1.5,4)和3(2,4.5),明显高于非IVMP组的1.5(0,3)和1(0,2),p=0.038和p=0.0027。在干预后的 1 个月和 12 个月,IVMP 组的症状表现极轻或更好的比例也大大高于非 IVMP 组,分别为 77% 和 92%,而非 IVMP 组分别为 0% 和 23%,p = 0.0001 和 0.001。没有发现严重的副作用。IVMP诱导疗法可以快速、安全地改善OMG症状,随后的低剂量免疫疗法可以在12个月内控制症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: A retrospective study
Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
期刊最新文献
Stroke cases with apraxia of speech due to damage to the left frontal aslant tract Does Wilson's disease determine specific personality traits? Analysis of patients with the neurological form of the disease Pneumocephalus caused by Enterobacter cloacae meningoencephalitis following cerebral infarction Post‐extrapontine myelinolysis mimicking multiple system atrophy Recurrent ischemic strokes and elevated CA125 levels in a patient with Meigs syndrome: A case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1