S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito
{"title":"眼肌萎缩症的甲基强的松龙静脉注射疗法:一项回顾性研究","authors":"S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito","doi":"10.1111/ncn3.12810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.","PeriodicalId":19154,"journal":{"name":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"S. Yorozu, Jinsoo Koh, Katsuichi Miyamoto, M. Sakata, Y. Nakayama, Maiko Takahashi, Megumi Mori, Junko Taruya, Takuya Matsumoto, Mai Minamino, Shuhei Ogami, Mayako Niwa, Y. Hiwatani, Y. Kajimoto, H. Ishiguchi, Hidefumi Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ncn3.12810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19154,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intravenous methylprednisolone therapy for ocular myasthenia gravis: A retrospective study
Although intravenous methylprednisolone pulse (IVMP) therapy has been recommended for ocular myasthenia gravis (OMG), the evidence is limited.We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of IVMP for OMG.The patients with OMG were chosen retrospectively from May 2010 to December 2022. The therapeutic effects between IVMP‐treated and non‐IVMP‐treated groups were determined by ∆ocular quantitative MG (QMG) score and the ∆ocular MG activities of daily living profile (MG‐ADL) score, which is the disparities of the scores between before and after 1 month of drug administration; and Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America post‐intervention status at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.There were 26 patients with OMG included, with the mean age of 67.2 ± 13.1 years. 13 of the 26 people with OMG received IVMP and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapies. The ∆ocular QMG and ∆ocular MG‐ADL scores were significantly higher in the IVMP group of 3 (1.5, 4) and 3 (2, 4.5) than in the non‐IVMP group of 1.5 (0, 3) and 1 (0, 2), p = 0.038 and p = 0.0027, respectively. The rates of minimal manifestation or better status in post‐intervention status at 1 and 12 months were also considerably higher in the IVMP group of 77% and 92% compared with the non‐IVMP group of 0% and 23%, p = 0.0001 and 0.001. There were no serious side effects discovered.IVMP induction therapy can quickly and safely improve symptoms of OMG, and subsequent low‐dose immunotherapy can keep symptoms at bay for 12 months.