实现高价值胃癌手术护理的途径

Swee H. Teh, Sharon Shiraga, Aaron M. Kellem, Robert A. Li, David M. Le, Said P. Arsalane, Fawzi S. Khayat, Yan Li, I-Yeh Gong, Jessica M. Lee
{"title":"实现高价值胃癌手术护理的途径","authors":"Swee H. Teh, Sharon Shiraga, Aaron M. Kellem, Robert A. Li, David M. Le, Said P. Arsalane, Fawzi S. Khayat, Yan Li, I-Yeh Gong, Jessica M. Lee","doi":"10.1097/as9.0000000000000408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events.\n \n \n \n Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide.\n \n \n \n To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery.\n \n \n \n There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012–April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016–March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49–41 days; P = 0.002).\n \n \n \n This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.\n","PeriodicalId":503165,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgery Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Path to High-Value Gastric Cancer Surgery Care Delivery\",\"authors\":\"Swee H. Teh, Sharon Shiraga, Aaron M. Kellem, Robert A. Li, David M. Le, Said P. Arsalane, Fawzi S. Khayat, Yan Li, I-Yeh Gong, Jessica M. Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/as9.0000000000000408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events.\\n \\n \\n \\n Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide.\\n \\n \\n \\n To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery.\\n \\n \\n \\n There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012–April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016–March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49–41 days; P = 0.002).\\n \\n \\n \\n This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":503165,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgery Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/as9.0000000000000408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估包括微创恢复和赋权护理(MIREC)路径在内的综合性区域计划的可行性、安全性和有效性,该计划可在不增加不良事件的情况下显著缩短腹腔镜胃切除术后的住院时间。 成本效益和改善患者疗效对于在全球范围内提供高质量的胃癌治疗至关重要。 目的是比较2012年2月至2023年3月期间在一个综合医疗系统中采用两种不同护理模式的胃癌手术效果。主要终点是住院时间。次要终点为术后 30 天内是否需要重症监护室护理、急诊室就诊、再次入院、再次手术和死亡。 共有 553 名患者接受了治疗,其中 167 人在治疗前(2012 年 2 月至 2016 年 4 月)接受了治疗,386 人在治疗后(2016 年 5 月至 2023 年 3 月)接受了治疗。围手术期化疗使用率从 31.7% 增加到 76.4%(P < 0.0001)。腹腔镜胃切除术从 17.4% 增加到 97.7%(P < 0.0001)。住院时间从 7 天减少到 2 天(P < 0.0001),分别有 32.1% 和 88% 的患者在术后第 1 天和第 2 天出院回家。如果比较 MIREC 前后的情况,30 天内重症监护室的使用率(10.8% 对 2.9%,P < 0.0001)、急诊室就诊率(34.7% 对 19.7%,P = 0.0002)和再入院率(18.6% 对 11.1%,P = 0.019)也大大降低。此外,更多患者接受了术后辅助化疗(31.4% 对 63.5%,P < 0.0001),胃切除术与开始辅助化疗之间的间隔时间也更短(49-41 天;P = 0.002)。 这项综合区域计划包括区域化治疗、腹腔镜方法、现代肿瘤治疗、外科亚专业化和MIREC路径,有可能改善胃癌手术的疗效。这些优势包括缩短住院时间和降低并发症发生率。因此,该计划可以彻底改变胃癌手术的实施方式,从而提高医疗质量,增加对患者的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Path to High-Value Gastric Cancer Surgery Care Delivery
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of a comprehensive regional program, including the Minimally Invasive Recovery and Empowerment Care (MIREC) pathway, that can significantly reduce hospital stays after laparoscopic gastrectomy without increasing adverse events. Cost-effectiveness and improving patient outcomes are crucial in providing quality gastric cancer care worldwide. To compare the outcomes of gastric cancer surgery using 2 different models of care within an integrated healthcare system from February 2012 to March 2023. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. The secondary endpoints were the need for intensive care unit care, emergency room (ER) visits, readmission, reoperation, and death within 30 days after surgery. There were 553 patients, 167 in the pre-(February 2012–April 2016) and 386 in the post-MIREC period (May 2016–March 2023). Perioperative chemotherapy utilization increased from 31.7% to 76.4% (P < 0.0001). Laparoscopic gastrectomy increased from 17.4% to 97.7% (P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization decreased from 7 to 2 days (P < 0.0001), with 32.1% and 88% of patients discharged home on postoperative day 1 and postoperative day 2, respectively. When comparing pre- and post-MIREC, intensive care unit utilization (10.8% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.0001), ER visits (34.7% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.0002), and readmission (18.6% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.019) at 30 days were also considerably lower. In addition, more patients received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (31.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.0001), and the time between gastrectomy and starting adjuvant chemotherapy was also less (49–41 days; P = 0.002). This comprehensive regional program, which encompasses regionalization care, laparoscopic approach, modern oncologic care, surgical subspecialization, and the MIREC pathway, can potentially improve gastric cancer surgery outcomes. These benefits include reduced hospital stays and lower complication rates. As such, this program can revolutionize how gastric cancer surgery is delivered, leading to a higher quality of care and increased value to patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Within-hospital Temporal Clustering of Postoperative Complications and Implications for Safety Monitoring and Benchmarking Using ACS-NSQIP Data Association Between Surgeon Sex and Days Alive at Home Following Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study Response to Comment by Dr. Kuang on Our Manuscript “Immediate Oral Refeeding in Patients With Mild and Moderate Acute Pancreatitis: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial (PADI trial)” Visual Mapping of Operating Theater Team Dynamics and Communication for Reflexive Feedback and Surgical Practice Optimization Surgical Outcomes and Sociodemographic Disparities Across All Races: An ACS-NSQIP and NHIS Multi-Institutional Analysis of Over 7.5 Million Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1