Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald
{"title":"阻塞性气道疾病患者的体能和非活动能力：\"能做，会做 \"分析","authors":"Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00108-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance<or ≥70%predicted) and physical activity as “do do”versus“don't do” (accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)<or ≥150 min/week). The control group had a greater proportion of people in the “can do, do do” quadrant compared with the OAD groups (76%versus10–33%). People with OAD in the “can't do, don't do” quadrant had worse clinical characteristics (airflow limitation, comorbidities, quality of life and functional dyspnoea) and spent less time doing light-intensity physical activity (LPA) and more time being sedentary compared with the “can do, do do” quadrant. This study highlights that many people with OAD may be inactive because they do not have the physical capacity to participate in MVPA, which is further impacted by greater disease severity. It is important to consider the potential benefits of addressing LPA and sedentary behaviour due to sub-optimal levels of these movement behaviours across different quadrants. Future research is needed to investigate if tailoring intervention approaches based on quadrant allocation is effective in people with OAD.","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":"139 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physical capacity and inactivity in obstructive airway diseases: a ‘Can do, do do’ analysis\",\"authors\":\"Paola D Urroz Guerrero, Hayley Lewthwaite, Peter G. Gibson, Vanessa L. Clark, Laura Cordova-Rivera, Vanessa M Mcdonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00108-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance<or ≥70%predicted) and physical activity as “do do”versus“don't do” (accelerometer derived moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA)<or ≥150 min/week). The control group had a greater proportion of people in the “can do, do do” quadrant compared with the OAD groups (76%versus10–33%). People with OAD in the “can't do, don't do” quadrant had worse clinical characteristics (airflow limitation, comorbidities, quality of life and functional dyspnoea) and spent less time doing light-intensity physical activity (LPA) and more time being sedentary compared with the “can do, do do” quadrant. This study highlights that many people with OAD may be inactive because they do not have the physical capacity to participate in MVPA, which is further impacted by greater disease severity. It is important to consider the potential benefits of addressing LPA and sedentary behaviour due to sub-optimal levels of these movement behaviours across different quadrants. Future research is needed to investigate if tailoring intervention approaches based on quadrant allocation is effective in people with OAD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":\"139 20\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00108-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00108-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physical capacity and inactivity in obstructive airway diseases: a ‘Can do, do do’ analysis
Physical capacity is an important determinant of physical activity in people with obstructive airway disease (OAD). This study aimed to extend the “can do, do do” concept in people with OAD, to identify if people categorised into quadrants based on physical capacity and activity differ by clinical and movement behaviour characteristics. A total of 281 participants (bronchiectasis n=60, severe asthma n=93, COPD n=70 and control n=58) completed assessments to characterise physical capacity as “can do”versus“can't do” (6-minute walk distance
期刊介绍：
ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
