以教育工作者的声音为中心,开展专业学习,促进数据丰富、基于地点的科学教学

Nicole Wong, Rasha Elsayed, Katy Nilsen, Leticia R. Perez, Kirsten R. Daehler
{"title":"以教育工作者的声音为中心,开展专业学习,促进数据丰富、基于地点的科学教学","authors":"Nicole Wong, Rasha Elsayed, Katy Nilsen, Leticia R. Perez, Kirsten R. Daehler","doi":"10.3390/educsci14040356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This self-reflective case study describes our project team’s efforts to promote equity in science professional learning (PL) by centering the voices of educators in the PL design process and within the course itself. We believe that educators’ experiences, priorities, and expertise are essential to developing professional learning that meets the needs of teachers and their students. We have a particular interest in amplifying the voices of those in historically underrepresented communities. Toward that end, we engaged science educators who work with Indigenous students and recent immigrants as collaborators in developing PL to support data-rich, place-based Earth Science instruction. In this case study, we share and critique the practices and tools that we have employed to center educator voices, rather than those of the PL designers and researchers. Our strategies for developing more equitable science professional learning include the use of: (a) equity-focused research methods, such as asset-based needs-sensing questions and peer-to-peer interviews; (b) a humanistic stance toward data-rich science learning, which emphasizes the typically unnamed sociocultural inputs and outputs that permeate all aspects of data; (c) a participatory design process that centers educator voices; and (d) a model of professional learning that uses representations of educator and student experiences as objects for reflection.","PeriodicalId":502600,"journal":{"name":"Education Sciences","volume":"104 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Centering Educators’ Voices in the Development of Professional Learning for Data-Rich, Place-Based Science Instruction\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Wong, Rasha Elsayed, Katy Nilsen, Leticia R. Perez, Kirsten R. Daehler\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/educsci14040356\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This self-reflective case study describes our project team’s efforts to promote equity in science professional learning (PL) by centering the voices of educators in the PL design process and within the course itself. We believe that educators’ experiences, priorities, and expertise are essential to developing professional learning that meets the needs of teachers and their students. We have a particular interest in amplifying the voices of those in historically underrepresented communities. Toward that end, we engaged science educators who work with Indigenous students and recent immigrants as collaborators in developing PL to support data-rich, place-based Earth Science instruction. In this case study, we share and critique the practices and tools that we have employed to center educator voices, rather than those of the PL designers and researchers. Our strategies for developing more equitable science professional learning include the use of: (a) equity-focused research methods, such as asset-based needs-sensing questions and peer-to-peer interviews; (b) a humanistic stance toward data-rich science learning, which emphasizes the typically unnamed sociocultural inputs and outputs that permeate all aspects of data; (c) a participatory design process that centers educator voices; and (d) a model of professional learning that uses representations of educator and student experiences as objects for reflection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":502600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education Sciences\",\"volume\":\"104 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040356\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040356","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项自我反思的案例研究描述了我们的项目团队在科学专业学习(PL)的设计过程中和课程本身中,以教育工作者的声音为中心,努力促进科学专业学习的公平性。我们相信,教育工作者的经验、优先事项和专业知识对于开发满足教师及其学生需求的专业学习至关重要。我们特别关注扩大那些在历史上代表性不足的群体的声音。为此,我们让那些与土著学生和新移民一起工作的科学教育工作者作为合作者,共同开发支持数据丰富、以地方为基础的地球科学教学的 PL。在本案例研究中,我们分享并批评了我们所采用的实践和工具,这些实践和工具以教育工作者的声音为中心,而不是以 PL 设计者和研究者的声音为中心。我们开发更公平的科学专业学习的策略包括:(a) 使用注重公平的研究方法,如基于资产的需求感知问题和同行访谈;(b) 对数据丰富的科学学习采取人本主义的立场,强调渗透到数据各个方面的通常未命名的社会文化输入和输出;(c) 以教育者的声音为中心的参与式设计过程;(d) 使用教育者和学生经验的表征作为反思对象的专业学习模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Centering Educators’ Voices in the Development of Professional Learning for Data-Rich, Place-Based Science Instruction
This self-reflective case study describes our project team’s efforts to promote equity in science professional learning (PL) by centering the voices of educators in the PL design process and within the course itself. We believe that educators’ experiences, priorities, and expertise are essential to developing professional learning that meets the needs of teachers and their students. We have a particular interest in amplifying the voices of those in historically underrepresented communities. Toward that end, we engaged science educators who work with Indigenous students and recent immigrants as collaborators in developing PL to support data-rich, place-based Earth Science instruction. In this case study, we share and critique the practices and tools that we have employed to center educator voices, rather than those of the PL designers and researchers. Our strategies for developing more equitable science professional learning include the use of: (a) equity-focused research methods, such as asset-based needs-sensing questions and peer-to-peer interviews; (b) a humanistic stance toward data-rich science learning, which emphasizes the typically unnamed sociocultural inputs and outputs that permeate all aspects of data; (c) a participatory design process that centers educator voices; and (d) a model of professional learning that uses representations of educator and student experiences as objects for reflection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Exploration of the Relationships between Emotional Well-Being, Learning Behaviour, and Academic Success in Postgraduate Students Who Combine Work with Study Soft Skills and Employability of Online Graduate Students Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices toward Artificial Intelligence among University Students in Lebanon Topic Modeling on Peer Interaction in Online and Mobile Learning of Higher Education: 1993–2022 Cognitive Reappraisal: The Bridge between Cognitive Load and Emotion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1