上肢运动质量测量:比较中风患者执行喝水任务时的 IMU 和光学运动捕捉

T. Unger, R. de Sousa Ribeiro, M. Mokni, T. Weikert, J. Pohl, A. Schwarz, J.P.O. Held, L. Sauerzopf, B. Kühnis, E. Gavagnin, A.R. Luft, R. Gassert, O. Lambercy, C. Awai Easthope, J.G. Schönhammer
{"title":"上肢运动质量测量:比较中风患者执行喝水任务时的 IMU 和光学运动捕捉","authors":"T. Unger, R. de Sousa Ribeiro, M. Mokni, T. Weikert, J. Pohl, A. Schwarz, J.P.O. Held, L. Sauerzopf, B. Kühnis, E. Gavagnin, A.R. Luft, R. Gassert, O. Lambercy, C. Awai Easthope, J.G. Schönhammer","doi":"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical assessment of upper limb sensorimotor function post-stroke is often constrained by low sensitivity and limited information on movement quality. To address this gap, recent studies proposed a standardized instrumented drinking task, as a representative daily activity combining different components of functional arm use. Although kinematic movement quality measures for this task are well-established, and optical motion capture (OMC) has proven effective in their measurement, its clinical application remains limited. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) emerge as a promising low-cost and user-friendly alternative, yet their validity and clinical relevance compared to the gold standard OMC need investigation.In this study, we conducted a measurement system comparison between IMUs and OMC, analyzing 15 established movement quality measures in 15 mild and moderate stroke patients performing the drinking task, using five IMUs placed on each wrist, upper arm, and trunk.Our findings revealed strong agreement between the systems, with 12 out of 15 measures demonstrating clinical applicability, evidenced by Limits of Agreement (LoA) below the Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for each measure.These results are promising, suggesting the clinical applicability of IMUs in quantifying movement quality for mildly and moderately impaired stroke patients performing the drinking task.","PeriodicalId":504480,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Digital Health","volume":"31 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Upper limb movement quality measures: comparing IMUs and optical motion capture in stroke patients performing a drinking task\",\"authors\":\"T. Unger, R. de Sousa Ribeiro, M. Mokni, T. Weikert, J. Pohl, A. Schwarz, J.P.O. Held, L. Sauerzopf, B. Kühnis, E. Gavagnin, A.R. Luft, R. Gassert, O. Lambercy, C. Awai Easthope, J.G. Schönhammer\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical assessment of upper limb sensorimotor function post-stroke is often constrained by low sensitivity and limited information on movement quality. To address this gap, recent studies proposed a standardized instrumented drinking task, as a representative daily activity combining different components of functional arm use. Although kinematic movement quality measures for this task are well-established, and optical motion capture (OMC) has proven effective in their measurement, its clinical application remains limited. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) emerge as a promising low-cost and user-friendly alternative, yet their validity and clinical relevance compared to the gold standard OMC need investigation.In this study, we conducted a measurement system comparison between IMUs and OMC, analyzing 15 established movement quality measures in 15 mild and moderate stroke patients performing the drinking task, using five IMUs placed on each wrist, upper arm, and trunk.Our findings revealed strong agreement between the systems, with 12 out of 15 measures demonstrating clinical applicability, evidenced by Limits of Agreement (LoA) below the Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for each measure.These results are promising, suggesting the clinical applicability of IMUs in quantifying movement quality for mildly and moderately impaired stroke patients performing the drinking task.\",\"PeriodicalId\":504480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"volume\":\"31 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Digital Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359776\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fdgth.2024.1359776","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

脑卒中后上肢感觉运动功能的临床评估往往受到灵敏度低和运动质量信息有限的限制。为了弥补这一不足,最近的研究提出了一项标准化的仪器饮水任务,作为一项具有代表性的日常活动,结合了手臂功能使用的不同组成部分。尽管针对这项任务的运动学运动质量测量方法已经成熟,而且光学运动捕捉(OMC)已被证明能有效测量运动质量,但其临床应用仍然有限。在本研究中,我们对惯性测量单元(IMU)和光学运动捕捉(OMC)的测量系统进行了比较,分析了 15 名轻度和中度中风患者在执行喝水任务时的 15 项已确立的运动质量测量指标,并在手腕、上臂和躯干上各安装了 5 个惯性测量单元。我们的研究结果表明,这两种测量系统之间具有很强的一致性,15 项测量中有 12 项具有临床适用性,每项测量的一致性限值(LoA)均低于最小临床重要性差异(MCID)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Upper limb movement quality measures: comparing IMUs and optical motion capture in stroke patients performing a drinking task
Clinical assessment of upper limb sensorimotor function post-stroke is often constrained by low sensitivity and limited information on movement quality. To address this gap, recent studies proposed a standardized instrumented drinking task, as a representative daily activity combining different components of functional arm use. Although kinematic movement quality measures for this task are well-established, and optical motion capture (OMC) has proven effective in their measurement, its clinical application remains limited. Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) emerge as a promising low-cost and user-friendly alternative, yet their validity and clinical relevance compared to the gold standard OMC need investigation.In this study, we conducted a measurement system comparison between IMUs and OMC, analyzing 15 established movement quality measures in 15 mild and moderate stroke patients performing the drinking task, using five IMUs placed on each wrist, upper arm, and trunk.Our findings revealed strong agreement between the systems, with 12 out of 15 measures demonstrating clinical applicability, evidenced by Limits of Agreement (LoA) below the Minimum Clinically Important Differences (MCID) for each measure.These results are promising, suggesting the clinical applicability of IMUs in quantifying movement quality for mildly and moderately impaired stroke patients performing the drinking task.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the design and development of a handheld electrocardiogram device in a clinical setting Analyzing the barriers and enablers to internet hospital implementation: a qualitative study of a tertiary hospital using TDF and COM-B framework Smartwatch step counting: impact on daily step-count estimation accuracy A review on over-sampling techniques in classification of multi-class imbalanced datasets: insights for medical problems The need for a refined classification system and national incident reporting system for health information technology-related incidents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1