Alexander Lerner, R. Jakušonoka, A. Jumtins, D. Rothem
{"title":"踝关节融合术是胫骨远端大面积缺失的唯一挽救手术和最佳结果吗:手术技术和临床结果","authors":"Alexander Lerner, R. Jakušonoka, A. Jumtins, D. Rothem","doi":"10.1097/btf.0000000000000420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Management of high-energy injuries with extensive soft tissue damage and massive distal tibial loss is challenging and often lead to severe dysfunction. In these complex situations ankle fusion procedure is the most commonly performed surgery. Publications devoted to treatment options and outcomes in these surgical challenging conditions are relatively rare.\n \n \n \n The purpose of this work is to present our clinical experience in using staged external fixation protocol in the treatment of six patients who suffered from complex open fractures of the distal tibial segment with severe bone and soft tissue loss due to high-energy trauma.\n \n \n \n The retrospective analysis of six patients (Gustilo-Anderson III B and III C fractures) with massive distal tibial loss and treated using a staged protocol of external fixation between 1998 and 2010, was carried out. Mean bone loss was 11.5 cm (range, 9 – 15 cm).\n \n \n \n All patients had reconstructive surgery using circular external fixation frames. The outcome in three of them was solid ankle fusion – two patients had acute distal shortening and proximal tibial elongation by distraction osteogenesis and one had acute fibular transfer to replace distal tibial loss with fixation using Ilizarov circular frame. In other three patients, the functional and the radiological outcome was pain-free ankle joint pseudoarthrosis – one had proximal tibial elongation, one had a combination of bone transport with distal fibular transfer and one had acute limb shortening without tibial elongation. All six patients were pain-free and satisfied with functional outcomes, regardless of the final solid bone fusion or pseudoarthrosis.\n \n \n \n The method of circular external fixation combined with proximal tibial elongation by distraction histogenesis is recommended for limb reconstruction in high-energy injuries with massive distal tibial loss including articular surface.\n \n \n \n Diagnostic Level Ⅳ.\n","PeriodicalId":507475,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is the Ankle Fusion the Single Salvage Procedure and the Best Result for the Massive Distal Tibial Loss: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Results\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Lerner, R. Jakušonoka, A. Jumtins, D. Rothem\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/btf.0000000000000420\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Management of high-energy injuries with extensive soft tissue damage and massive distal tibial loss is challenging and often lead to severe dysfunction. In these complex situations ankle fusion procedure is the most commonly performed surgery. Publications devoted to treatment options and outcomes in these surgical challenging conditions are relatively rare.\\n \\n \\n \\n The purpose of this work is to present our clinical experience in using staged external fixation protocol in the treatment of six patients who suffered from complex open fractures of the distal tibial segment with severe bone and soft tissue loss due to high-energy trauma.\\n \\n \\n \\n The retrospective analysis of six patients (Gustilo-Anderson III B and III C fractures) with massive distal tibial loss and treated using a staged protocol of external fixation between 1998 and 2010, was carried out. Mean bone loss was 11.5 cm (range, 9 – 15 cm).\\n \\n \\n \\n All patients had reconstructive surgery using circular external fixation frames. The outcome in three of them was solid ankle fusion – two patients had acute distal shortening and proximal tibial elongation by distraction osteogenesis and one had acute fibular transfer to replace distal tibial loss with fixation using Ilizarov circular frame. In other three patients, the functional and the radiological outcome was pain-free ankle joint pseudoarthrosis – one had proximal tibial elongation, one had a combination of bone transport with distal fibular transfer and one had acute limb shortening without tibial elongation. All six patients were pain-free and satisfied with functional outcomes, regardless of the final solid bone fusion or pseudoarthrosis.\\n \\n \\n \\n The method of circular external fixation combined with proximal tibial elongation by distraction histogenesis is recommended for limb reconstruction in high-energy injuries with massive distal tibial loss including articular surface.\\n \\n \\n \\n Diagnostic Level Ⅳ.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":507475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/btf.0000000000000420\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/btf.0000000000000420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
处理具有广泛软组织损伤和大量胫骨远端缺失的高能量损伤具有挑战性,通常会导致严重的功能障碍。在这些复杂情况下,踝关节融合术是最常用的手术。有关这些手术难题的治疗方案和结果的出版物相对较少。 本文旨在介绍我们采用分期外固定方案治疗六名因高能量创伤导致骨和软组织严重缺损的胫骨远端复杂开放性骨折患者的临床经验。 该研究对 1998 年至 2010 年间采用分期外固定方案治疗的六名胫骨远端大量缺损的患者(Gustilo-Anderson III B 型和 III C 型骨折)进行了回顾性分析。平均骨量损失为 11.5 厘米(9 - 15 厘米)。 所有患者均使用圆形外固定架进行了重建手术。其中三名患者的手术结果为踝关节实体融合--两名患者通过牵引成骨术进行了急性远端缩短和胫骨近端拉长,一名患者进行了急性腓骨转移以替代胫骨远端缺损,并使用Ilizarov圆形外固定架进行固定。其他三名患者的功能和放射学结果均为无痛性踝关节假关节--一名患者进行了胫骨近端拉长,一名患者进行了骨转运与腓骨远端转移相结合的治疗,一名患者进行了急性肢体缩短,但未进行胫骨拉长。无论最终采用的是实骨融合还是假关节,所有六名患者均无疼痛,并对功能结果感到满意。 对于胫骨远端(包括关节面)大量缺损的高能量损伤的肢体重建,推荐采用环形外固定结合牵引组织生成法进行胫骨近端拉长的方法。 诊断级别Ⅳ。
Is the Ankle Fusion the Single Salvage Procedure and the Best Result for the Massive Distal Tibial Loss: Surgical Techniques and Clinical Results
Management of high-energy injuries with extensive soft tissue damage and massive distal tibial loss is challenging and often lead to severe dysfunction. In these complex situations ankle fusion procedure is the most commonly performed surgery. Publications devoted to treatment options and outcomes in these surgical challenging conditions are relatively rare.
The purpose of this work is to present our clinical experience in using staged external fixation protocol in the treatment of six patients who suffered from complex open fractures of the distal tibial segment with severe bone and soft tissue loss due to high-energy trauma.
The retrospective analysis of six patients (Gustilo-Anderson III B and III C fractures) with massive distal tibial loss and treated using a staged protocol of external fixation between 1998 and 2010, was carried out. Mean bone loss was 11.5 cm (range, 9 – 15 cm).
All patients had reconstructive surgery using circular external fixation frames. The outcome in three of them was solid ankle fusion – two patients had acute distal shortening and proximal tibial elongation by distraction osteogenesis and one had acute fibular transfer to replace distal tibial loss with fixation using Ilizarov circular frame. In other three patients, the functional and the radiological outcome was pain-free ankle joint pseudoarthrosis – one had proximal tibial elongation, one had a combination of bone transport with distal fibular transfer and one had acute limb shortening without tibial elongation. All six patients were pain-free and satisfied with functional outcomes, regardless of the final solid bone fusion or pseudoarthrosis.
The method of circular external fixation combined with proximal tibial elongation by distraction histogenesis is recommended for limb reconstruction in high-energy injuries with massive distal tibial loss including articular surface.
Diagnostic Level Ⅳ.