使用有限元评估不同尺度的不完善科尔斯基棒实验的影响

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1115/1.4065206
Thomas H. Hannah, V. Martin, Stephen Ellis, Reuben H. Kraft
{"title":"使用有限元评估不同尺度的不完善科尔斯基棒实验的影响","authors":"Thomas H. Hannah, V. Martin, Stephen Ellis, Reuben H. Kraft","doi":"10.1115/1.4065206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Typical Kolsky bars are 10-20mm in diameter with lengths of each main bar being on the scale of meters. To push 104+ strain rates, smaller systems are needed. As the diameter and mass decreases the precision in the alignment must increase to maintain the same relative tolerance, and the potential impacts of gravity and friction change. Finite Element models are typically generated assuming a perfect experiment with exact alignment and no gravity. Additionally, these simulations tend to take advantage of the radial symmetry of an ideal experiment which removes any potential for modeling non-symmetric effects, but has the benefit of reducing computational load. In this work we discuss results from these fast-running symmetry models to establish a baseline and demonstrate their first-order use case. We then take advantage of high-performance computing techniques to generate half symmetry simulations using Abaqu to model gravity and misalignment. The imperfection is initially modeled using a static general step followed by a dynamic explicit step to simulate the impact events. This multi-step simulation structure can properly investigate the impact of these real-world, non-axis symmetric effects. These simulations explore the impacts of these experimental realities and are described in detail to allow other researchers to implement a similar FE modeling structure to aid in experimentation and diagnostic efforts. It is shown that of the two sizes evaluated, the smaller 3.16mm system is more sensitive than the larger 12.7mm system to such imperfections","PeriodicalId":52254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Imperfect Kolsky Bar Experiments Across Different Scales Assessed Using Finite Elements\",\"authors\":\"Thomas H. Hannah, V. Martin, Stephen Ellis, Reuben H. Kraft\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4065206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Typical Kolsky bars are 10-20mm in diameter with lengths of each main bar being on the scale of meters. To push 104+ strain rates, smaller systems are needed. As the diameter and mass decreases the precision in the alignment must increase to maintain the same relative tolerance, and the potential impacts of gravity and friction change. Finite Element models are typically generated assuming a perfect experiment with exact alignment and no gravity. Additionally, these simulations tend to take advantage of the radial symmetry of an ideal experiment which removes any potential for modeling non-symmetric effects, but has the benefit of reducing computational load. In this work we discuss results from these fast-running symmetry models to establish a baseline and demonstrate their first-order use case. We then take advantage of high-performance computing techniques to generate half symmetry simulations using Abaqu to model gravity and misalignment. The imperfection is initially modeled using a static general step followed by a dynamic explicit step to simulate the impact events. This multi-step simulation structure can properly investigate the impact of these real-world, non-axis symmetric effects. These simulations explore the impacts of these experimental realities and are described in detail to allow other researchers to implement a similar FE modeling structure to aid in experimentation and diagnostic efforts. It is shown that of the two sizes evaluated, the smaller 3.16mm system is more sensitive than the larger 12.7mm system to such imperfections\",\"PeriodicalId\":52254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065206\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4065206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

典型的 Kolsky 棒直径为 10-20 毫米,每根主棒的长度为米。要实现 104+ 的应变率,就需要更小的系统。随着直径和质量的减小,必须提高校准精度以保持相同的相对公差,重力和摩擦的潜在影响也会发生变化。有限元模型通常是假定在精确对准和无重力的完美实验中生成的。此外,这些模拟往往会利用理想实验的径向对称性,从而消除非对称效应建模的可能性,但这样做的好处是可以减少计算负荷。在这项工作中,我们讨论了这些快速运行对称模型的结果,以建立一个基线,并展示其一阶用例。然后,我们利用高性能计算技术,使用 Abaqu 生成半对称模拟,对重力和不对齐进行建模。最初使用静态一般步骤对缺陷进行建模,然后使用动态显式步骤模拟撞击事件。这种多步骤模拟结构可以正确研究这些现实世界中的非轴对称效应的影响。这些模拟探索了这些实验现实的影响,并进行了详细描述,以便其他研究人员采用类似的 FE 建模结构来帮助实验和诊断工作。结果表明,在所评估的两种尺寸中,较小的 3.16 毫米系统比较大的 12.7 毫米系统对此类缺陷更敏感
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Imperfect Kolsky Bar Experiments Across Different Scales Assessed Using Finite Elements
Typical Kolsky bars are 10-20mm in diameter with lengths of each main bar being on the scale of meters. To push 104+ strain rates, smaller systems are needed. As the diameter and mass decreases the precision in the alignment must increase to maintain the same relative tolerance, and the potential impacts of gravity and friction change. Finite Element models are typically generated assuming a perfect experiment with exact alignment and no gravity. Additionally, these simulations tend to take advantage of the radial symmetry of an ideal experiment which removes any potential for modeling non-symmetric effects, but has the benefit of reducing computational load. In this work we discuss results from these fast-running symmetry models to establish a baseline and demonstrate their first-order use case. We then take advantage of high-performance computing techniques to generate half symmetry simulations using Abaqu to model gravity and misalignment. The imperfection is initially modeled using a static general step followed by a dynamic explicit step to simulate the impact events. This multi-step simulation structure can properly investigate the impact of these real-world, non-axis symmetric effects. These simulations explore the impacts of these experimental realities and are described in detail to allow other researchers to implement a similar FE modeling structure to aid in experimentation and diagnostic efforts. It is shown that of the two sizes evaluated, the smaller 3.16mm system is more sensitive than the larger 12.7mm system to such imperfections
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
A Curved Surface Integral Method for Reliability Analysis of Multiple Failure Modes System with Non-Overlapping Failure Domains A Framework for Developing Systematic Testbeds for Multi-Fidelity Optimization Techniques Reliability Analysis for RV Reducer by Combining PCE and Saddlepoint Approximation Considering Multi-Failure Modes Machine Learning-Based Resilience Modeling and Assessment of High Consequence Systems Under Uncertainty Posterior Covariance Matrix Approximations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1