社会条件:是对欧盟农业工人所面临挑战的适当法律回应,还是共同农业政策中的一个 "洗白 "例子?

IF 1.1 Q2 LAW European Labour Law Journal Pub Date : 2024-03-28 DOI:10.1177/20319525241242794
Thomas Bangsgaard Lyngs
{"title":"社会条件:是对欧盟农业工人所面临挑战的适当法律回应,还是共同农业政策中的一个 \"洗白 \"例子?","authors":"Thomas Bangsgaard Lyngs","doi":"10.1177/20319525241242794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article provides a doctrinal legal analysis of the ‘social conditionality’ mechanism introduced in the latest reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Building on that analysis, the article proceeds to assess the likelihood of social conditionality improving the conditions of agricultural workers in the EU, thereby achieving the objectives set out for it by the EU legislator. The article concludes that due to numerous issues regarding its legal architecture, including limitations in its scope, the absence of novel requirements imposed on farmers, and the rather limited dissuasive effect of its enforcement mechanism, social conditionality is unlikely to improve the conditions for agricultural workers in the EU. Therefore, it is ultimately proposed that social conditionality might more appropriately be considered as an example of ‘redwashing’ within the CAP rather than an adequate legal response to the challenges faced by agricultural workers in the EU.","PeriodicalId":41157,"journal":{"name":"European Labour Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social conditionality: An adequate legal response to challenges faced by agricultural workers in the EU, or an example of redwashing within the Common Agricultural Policy?\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Bangsgaard Lyngs\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20319525241242794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article provides a doctrinal legal analysis of the ‘social conditionality’ mechanism introduced in the latest reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Building on that analysis, the article proceeds to assess the likelihood of social conditionality improving the conditions of agricultural workers in the EU, thereby achieving the objectives set out for it by the EU legislator. The article concludes that due to numerous issues regarding its legal architecture, including limitations in its scope, the absence of novel requirements imposed on farmers, and the rather limited dissuasive effect of its enforcement mechanism, social conditionality is unlikely to improve the conditions for agricultural workers in the EU. Therefore, it is ultimately proposed that social conditionality might more appropriately be considered as an example of ‘redwashing’ within the CAP rather than an adequate legal response to the challenges faced by agricultural workers in the EU.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Labour Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241242794\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Labour Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241242794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对欧盟共同农业政策(CAP)最新改革中引入的 "社会条件 "机制进行了理论法律分析。在此分析的基础上,文章进而评估了社会条件机制改善欧盟农业工人条件的可能性,从而实现欧盟立法者为其设定的目标。文章的结论是,由于其法律架构存在诸多问题,包括范围有限、缺乏对农民的新要求,以及其执行机制的劝阻作用相当有限,社会附加条件不太可能改善欧盟农业工人的条件。因此,最终建议将社会附加条件视为 CAP 中 "再清洗 "的一个例子,而不是应对欧盟农业工人所面临挑战的适当法律对策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social conditionality: An adequate legal response to challenges faced by agricultural workers in the EU, or an example of redwashing within the Common Agricultural Policy?
This article provides a doctrinal legal analysis of the ‘social conditionality’ mechanism introduced in the latest reform of the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). Building on that analysis, the article proceeds to assess the likelihood of social conditionality improving the conditions of agricultural workers in the EU, thereby achieving the objectives set out for it by the EU legislator. The article concludes that due to numerous issues regarding its legal architecture, including limitations in its scope, the absence of novel requirements imposed on farmers, and the rather limited dissuasive effect of its enforcement mechanism, social conditionality is unlikely to improve the conditions for agricultural workers in the EU. Therefore, it is ultimately proposed that social conditionality might more appropriately be considered as an example of ‘redwashing’ within the CAP rather than an adequate legal response to the challenges faced by agricultural workers in the EU.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
28.60%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Anti-discrimination cases decided by the Court of Justice of the EU in 2023 Resocialisation through prisoner remuneration: The unconstitutionally low remuneration of working prisoners in Germany Work in prison: Reintegration or exclusion and exploitation? Beyond profit: A model framework for ethical and feasible private prison labour Minding the gap? Blind spots in the ILO's and the EU's perspective on anti-forced labour policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1