新西兰和澳大利亚处理同性祝福和同性婚姻辩论的对比方法:运用荣格心理学类型理论的启示

IF 0.4 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Anglican Studies Pub Date : 2024-03-27 DOI:10.1017/s1740355324000093
Ursula Mckenna, Leslie J. Francis, A. Village
{"title":"新西兰和澳大利亚处理同性祝福和同性婚姻辩论的对比方法:运用荣格心理学类型理论的启示","authors":"Ursula Mckenna, Leslie J. Francis, A. Village","doi":"10.1017/s1740355324000093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In October 2022 the Church of England commissioned an examination of the impact of the debate on same-sex blessing and same-sex marriage within other Anglican Churches. The examination involved a literature search, an original survey among key informers and a general internet search. This paper draws on the general internet search to contrast the impacts in New Zealand and Australia. Drawing on Jungian psychological type theory, this analysis employs the contrasting decision-making functions of feeling (concerned with subjective interpersonal values) and thinking (concerned with objective logical analysis). The data suggest that the feeling approach dominant in New Zealand, which prioritized offering space and time for those of differing opinions to meet together, reported more positive outcomes than the thinking approach dominant in Australia, which gave greater priority to adversarial debate.","PeriodicalId":40751,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anglican Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting Approaches to Managing the Debate on Same-Sex Blessing and Same-Sex Marriage in New Zealand and Australia: Applying Insights from Jungian Psychological Type Theory\",\"authors\":\"Ursula Mckenna, Leslie J. Francis, A. Village\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s1740355324000093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n In October 2022 the Church of England commissioned an examination of the impact of the debate on same-sex blessing and same-sex marriage within other Anglican Churches. The examination involved a literature search, an original survey among key informers and a general internet search. This paper draws on the general internet search to contrast the impacts in New Zealand and Australia. Drawing on Jungian psychological type theory, this analysis employs the contrasting decision-making functions of feeling (concerned with subjective interpersonal values) and thinking (concerned with objective logical analysis). The data suggest that the feeling approach dominant in New Zealand, which prioritized offering space and time for those of differing opinions to meet together, reported more positive outcomes than the thinking approach dominant in Australia, which gave greater priority to adversarial debate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Anglican Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Anglican Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355324000093\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anglican Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1740355324000093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年 10 月,英格兰教会委托对其他圣公会内部关于同性祝福和同性婚姻的辩论所产生的影响进行研究。该研究包括文献检索、对主要信息提供者的原始调查和一般互联网搜索。本文以互联网搜索为基础,对比了新西兰和澳大利亚的影响。本分析借鉴了荣格心理学的类型理论,采用了感觉(关注主观的人际价值观)和思考(关注客观的逻辑分析)这两种截然不同的决策功能。数据表明,在新西兰占主导地位的感觉型决策方法优先考虑为持不同意见的人提供共聚一堂的空间和时间,与在澳大利亚占主导地位的思维型决策方法相比,感觉型决策方法报告的结果更为积极,而思维型决策方法则更优先考虑对抗性辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Contrasting Approaches to Managing the Debate on Same-Sex Blessing and Same-Sex Marriage in New Zealand and Australia: Applying Insights from Jungian Psychological Type Theory
In October 2022 the Church of England commissioned an examination of the impact of the debate on same-sex blessing and same-sex marriage within other Anglican Churches. The examination involved a literature search, an original survey among key informers and a general internet search. This paper draws on the general internet search to contrast the impacts in New Zealand and Australia. Drawing on Jungian psychological type theory, this analysis employs the contrasting decision-making functions of feeling (concerned with subjective interpersonal values) and thinking (concerned with objective logical analysis). The data suggest that the feeling approach dominant in New Zealand, which prioritized offering space and time for those of differing opinions to meet together, reported more positive outcomes than the thinking approach dominant in Australia, which gave greater priority to adversarial debate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
46
期刊最新文献
Sean Whittle (ed.), New Thinking, New Scholarship and New Research in Catholic Education: Responses to the Work of Professor Gerald Grace (Abingdon and New York: Routledge, 2022), pp. xxvii +258. ISBN 978-0-367-77472-1 (pbk) Kwok Pui-Lan, The Anglican Tradition from a Postcolonial Perspective (New York: Seabury Books, 2023), pp. 256, ISBN: 978-1640656291 Ian Bradley, Breathers of an Ampler Day: Victorian Views of Heaven (Durham, Sacristy Press, 2023) vii + 195 Pbk £14.99 ISBN 978-1-78959-291-7 Rowan Williams’ Theology of Revelation Three Trajectories in Nineteenth-Century Anglican Biblical Interpretation: From Narrow to Broad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1