心理教育对提高重返临床实践的医护专业人员的个人技能和幸福感的功效:一项试验性前后期研究

Raul Szekely, Syrgena Mazreku, A. Bignell, Camilla Fadel, Hannah Iannelli, Marta Ortega Vega, Owen P. O'Sullivan, Claire Tiley, C. Attoe
{"title":"心理教育对提高重返临床实践的医护专业人员的个人技能和幸福感的功效:一项试验性前后期研究","authors":"Raul Szekely, Syrgena Mazreku, A. Bignell, Camilla Fadel, Hannah Iannelli, Marta Ortega Vega, Owen P. O'Sullivan, Claire Tiley, C. Attoe","doi":"10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nMany health-care professionals leave clinical practice temporarily or permanently. Interventions designed to facilitate the return of health-care professionals fail to consider returners’ psychosocial needs despite their importance for patient care. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving personal skills and well-being among UK-based health-care professionals returning to clinical practice.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nIn total, 20 health-care professionals took part in the one-day intervention and completed measures of demographics, self-efficacy, positive attitudes towards work and perceived job resources before and after the intervention. A baseline comparison group of 18 health-care professionals was also recruited.\n\n\nFindings\nSignificant associations were detected between return-to-work stage and study group. Following the intervention, participants reported improvements in self-efficacy and, generally, perceived more job resources, whereas positive attitudes towards work decreased. While none of these changes were significant, the intervention was deemed acceptable by participants. This study provides modest but promising evidence for the role of psychoeducation as a tool in supporting the psychosocial needs of returning health-care professionals.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nAdditional research is needed to clarify the reliability of intervention effects, its effectiveness compared to alternative interventions, and the impact across different subgroups of returning health-care professionals.\n\n\nPractical implications\nReturn-to-practice interventions should address the psychosocial needs of health-care professionals in terms of their personal skills and well-being. Psychoeducation can increase self-efficacy and perceptions of job resources among returning health-care professionals.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study sheds light on a relatively understudied, but fundamental area – the psychosocial challenges of health-care professionals returning to clinical practice – and further justifies the need for tailored interventions.\n","PeriodicalId":517075,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The efficacy of psychoeducation to improve personal skills and well-being among health-care professionals returning to clinical practice: a pilot pre-post study\",\"authors\":\"Raul Szekely, Syrgena Mazreku, A. Bignell, Camilla Fadel, Hannah Iannelli, Marta Ortega Vega, Owen P. O'Sullivan, Claire Tiley, C. Attoe\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nMany health-care professionals leave clinical practice temporarily or permanently. Interventions designed to facilitate the return of health-care professionals fail to consider returners’ psychosocial needs despite their importance for patient care. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving personal skills and well-being among UK-based health-care professionals returning to clinical practice.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nIn total, 20 health-care professionals took part in the one-day intervention and completed measures of demographics, self-efficacy, positive attitudes towards work and perceived job resources before and after the intervention. A baseline comparison group of 18 health-care professionals was also recruited.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nSignificant associations were detected between return-to-work stage and study group. Following the intervention, participants reported improvements in self-efficacy and, generally, perceived more job resources, whereas positive attitudes towards work decreased. While none of these changes were significant, the intervention was deemed acceptable by participants. This study provides modest but promising evidence for the role of psychoeducation as a tool in supporting the psychosocial needs of returning health-care professionals.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nAdditional research is needed to clarify the reliability of intervention effects, its effectiveness compared to alternative interventions, and the impact across different subgroups of returning health-care professionals.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nReturn-to-practice interventions should address the psychosocial needs of health-care professionals in terms of their personal skills and well-being. Psychoeducation can increase self-efficacy and perceptions of job resources among returning health-care professionals.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study sheds light on a relatively understudied, but fundamental area – the psychosocial challenges of health-care professionals returning to clinical practice – and further justifies the need for tailored interventions.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":517075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0089\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Mental Health Training, Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jmhtep-11-2022-0089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 许多医护专业人员暂时或永久离开临床实践。尽管医护人员的社会心理需求对患者护理非常重要,但旨在促进医护人员回归的干预措施却没有考虑到回归者的社会心理需求。本研究旨在评估心理教育干预措施在改善重返临床实践的英国医护专业人员的个人技能和幸福感方面的效果。设计/方法/途径共有 20 名医护专业人员参加了为期一天的干预措施,并在干预前后完成了人口统计学、自我效能感、对工作的积极态度和感知工作资源的测量。研究结果发现,重返工作岗位阶段与研究小组之间存在显著关联。干预后,参与者的自我效能感有所提高,总体上认为工作资源有所增加,而对工作的积极态度则有所下降。虽然这些变化都不显著,但参与者认为干预是可以接受的。这项研究提供了适度但有希望的证据,证明心理教育作为一种工具,在支持重返职场的医护专业人员的社会心理需求方面发挥了作用。研究局限/启示需要进行更多的研究,以明确干预效果的可靠性、与其他干预措施相比的有效性,以及对重返职场的医护专业人员不同亚群的影响。心理教育可以提高重返临床的医护人员的自我效能感和对工作资源的认知。原创性/价值这项研究揭示了一个相对研究不足但却非常重要的领域--医护人员重返临床所面临的社会心理挑战--并进一步证明了采取有针对性的干预措施的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The efficacy of psychoeducation to improve personal skills and well-being among health-care professionals returning to clinical practice: a pilot pre-post study
Purpose Many health-care professionals leave clinical practice temporarily or permanently. Interventions designed to facilitate the return of health-care professionals fail to consider returners’ psychosocial needs despite their importance for patient care. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a psychoeducational intervention in improving personal skills and well-being among UK-based health-care professionals returning to clinical practice. Design/methodology/approach In total, 20 health-care professionals took part in the one-day intervention and completed measures of demographics, self-efficacy, positive attitudes towards work and perceived job resources before and after the intervention. A baseline comparison group of 18 health-care professionals was also recruited. Findings Significant associations were detected between return-to-work stage and study group. Following the intervention, participants reported improvements in self-efficacy and, generally, perceived more job resources, whereas positive attitudes towards work decreased. While none of these changes were significant, the intervention was deemed acceptable by participants. This study provides modest but promising evidence for the role of psychoeducation as a tool in supporting the psychosocial needs of returning health-care professionals. Research limitations/implications Additional research is needed to clarify the reliability of intervention effects, its effectiveness compared to alternative interventions, and the impact across different subgroups of returning health-care professionals. Practical implications Return-to-practice interventions should address the psychosocial needs of health-care professionals in terms of their personal skills and well-being. Psychoeducation can increase self-efficacy and perceptions of job resources among returning health-care professionals. Originality/value This study sheds light on a relatively understudied, but fundamental area – the psychosocial challenges of health-care professionals returning to clinical practice – and further justifies the need for tailored interventions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
“When I started teaching you wouldn’t notice any of that’: teachers’ perceptions of the issues facing children and adolescents’ mental health and well-being” Effect of smartphone addiction on mental health and sleep quality among undergraduate pharmacy students in a Nigerian public university The impact of sensory modulation in acute mental health units: an organisational case study analysis Experiences of pre-registration student nurses during mental health clinical placements that enhance practice learning: an integrative literature review Participation and satisfaction with thee-learning course “Mental health promotion in school health care”: a mixed-method study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1