森林类型对中国黄土高原丘陵地区碳储量的影响

IF 2.7 3区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY Frontiers in Forests and Global Change Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047
Zhihua Song, Peng Shi, Peng Li, Zhan-bin Li, Hongbo Niu, Pengju Zu, Manhong Cao, Yili Jia
{"title":"森林类型对中国黄土高原丘陵地区碳储量的影响","authors":"Zhihua Song, Peng Shi, Peng Li, Zhan-bin Li, Hongbo Niu, Pengju Zu, Manhong Cao, Yili Jia","doi":"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The hilly region of the Loess Plateau has lush vegetation and high carbon sequestration potential. However, previous studies have not focused on differences in carbon storage of different forest types and their causes. This study aimed to explore the carbon storage of forest and identify the main influencing factors of carbon storage to provide basis for improving the carbon fixation capacity of planted forest in the region. Broad-leaved, coniferous, and mixed forests at different altitudes were selected from the Ziwuling Mountains in the Loess hilly region. The carbon storage as well as physical and chemical characteristics of the vegetation and soil samples from different soil layers were measured. The vegetation factor, terrain factor, and soil factor of the sample plot were evaluated by Mantel test and redundancy analysis (RDA). The carbon storage of the mixed forest (138.87 MgC hm−2) showed the highest carbon storage compared to broad-leaved forest (131.97 MgC hm−2) and coniferous forest (113.62 MgC hm−2) in the loess hilly region. The carbon storage of different components followed the order of soil carbon storage, vegetation carbon storage, and litter carbon storage. The soil organic carbon content and forest type had the highest explanations for total carbon storage, accounting for 57 and 26.9% of the variance, respectively. This indicates that forest type is an important factor affecting carbon storage, and selecting mixed forests can achieve better results when creating and transforming carbon sink forests.","PeriodicalId":12538,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of forest type on carbon storage in the hilly region of Loess Plateau, China\",\"authors\":\"Zhihua Song, Peng Shi, Peng Li, Zhan-bin Li, Hongbo Niu, Pengju Zu, Manhong Cao, Yili Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The hilly region of the Loess Plateau has lush vegetation and high carbon sequestration potential. However, previous studies have not focused on differences in carbon storage of different forest types and their causes. This study aimed to explore the carbon storage of forest and identify the main influencing factors of carbon storage to provide basis for improving the carbon fixation capacity of planted forest in the region. Broad-leaved, coniferous, and mixed forests at different altitudes were selected from the Ziwuling Mountains in the Loess hilly region. The carbon storage as well as physical and chemical characteristics of the vegetation and soil samples from different soil layers were measured. The vegetation factor, terrain factor, and soil factor of the sample plot were evaluated by Mantel test and redundancy analysis (RDA). The carbon storage of the mixed forest (138.87 MgC hm−2) showed the highest carbon storage compared to broad-leaved forest (131.97 MgC hm−2) and coniferous forest (113.62 MgC hm−2) in the loess hilly region. The carbon storage of different components followed the order of soil carbon storage, vegetation carbon storage, and litter carbon storage. The soil organic carbon content and forest type had the highest explanations for total carbon storage, accounting for 57 and 26.9% of the variance, respectively. This indicates that forest type is an important factor affecting carbon storage, and selecting mixed forests can achieve better results when creating and transforming carbon sink forests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Forests and Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2024.1349047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黄土高原丘陵地区植被茂盛,固碳潜力大。然而,以往的研究并未关注不同森林类型碳储量的差异及其成因。本研究旨在探索森林碳储量,找出碳储量的主要影响因素,为提高该地区人工林的碳固定能力提供依据。本研究选取了黄土丘陵区子午岭山地不同海拔高度的阔叶林、针叶林和混交林。测量了植被和不同土层土壤样本的碳储量、物理和化学特征。通过 Mantel 检验和冗余分析(RDA)评估了样地的植被因子、地形因子和土壤因子。与黄土丘陵区阔叶林(131.97 MgC hm-2)和针叶林(113.62 MgC hm-2)相比,混交林(138.87 MgC hm-2)的碳储量最高。不同成分的碳储量依次为土壤碳储量、植被碳储量和枯落物碳储量。土壤有机碳含量和森林类型对总碳储量的解释力最大,分别占方差的 57% 和 26.9%。这说明森林类型是影响碳储量的重要因素,选择混交林可以在碳汇林的营造和改造中取得更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of forest type on carbon storage in the hilly region of Loess Plateau, China
The hilly region of the Loess Plateau has lush vegetation and high carbon sequestration potential. However, previous studies have not focused on differences in carbon storage of different forest types and their causes. This study aimed to explore the carbon storage of forest and identify the main influencing factors of carbon storage to provide basis for improving the carbon fixation capacity of planted forest in the region. Broad-leaved, coniferous, and mixed forests at different altitudes were selected from the Ziwuling Mountains in the Loess hilly region. The carbon storage as well as physical and chemical characteristics of the vegetation and soil samples from different soil layers were measured. The vegetation factor, terrain factor, and soil factor of the sample plot were evaluated by Mantel test and redundancy analysis (RDA). The carbon storage of the mixed forest (138.87 MgC hm−2) showed the highest carbon storage compared to broad-leaved forest (131.97 MgC hm−2) and coniferous forest (113.62 MgC hm−2) in the loess hilly region. The carbon storage of different components followed the order of soil carbon storage, vegetation carbon storage, and litter carbon storage. The soil organic carbon content and forest type had the highest explanations for total carbon storage, accounting for 57 and 26.9% of the variance, respectively. This indicates that forest type is an important factor affecting carbon storage, and selecting mixed forests can achieve better results when creating and transforming carbon sink forests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
256
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Short-term effects of understory removal on understory diversity and biomass of temperate forests in northeast China Mitigating Norway spruce mortality through the combined use of an anti-attractant for Ips typographus and an attractant for Thanasimus formicarius Soil organic carbon, pH, and ammonium nitrogen controlled changes in bacterial community structure and functional groups after forest conversion Firewood transport and invasive insect spread in Michigan Editorial: Assessment of anthropogenic pollution as a cause of forest disturbance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1