(O-20) 比较三种冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍的方案

H. Corredor, J. M. Martínez, C. Sandoval-Salinas, J. Barba, F. Patrón
{"title":"(O-20) 比较三种冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍的方案","authors":"H. Corredor, J. M. Martínez, C. Sandoval-Salinas, J. Barba, F. Patrón","doi":"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Multiple treatment modalities have been used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED), including focal shock waves. This therapy has demonstrated a short-term positive effect in patients who respond or not to PDE-5i, with variability in therapeutic protocols.\n \n \n \n To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 shock wave protocols for the treatment of ED.\n \n \n \n Randomized, multicenter clinical trial. 277 men with non-psychological ED, over 18 years of age, without cancer or major surgeries in the pelvic area or any neurological disease that affected their erectile function, were randomized to one of three groups: weekly (6 wave sessions (WS), 1 x wk), monthly (6 WS 1 x month) or reinforcement (6 WS, 1 x week + 5 sessions, 1 x month). The wave parameters were the same in all groups, no patient received medication. The primary outcome was the change in IIEF-EF score at 6 months of follow-up. The change in the IIEF at the end of therapy and at 3 months of follow-up, erection hardness with the EHS, self-esteem with the SEAR questionnaire, and side effects were also evaluated.\n \n \n \n 222 patients completed the study. In the 6-month evaluation, the average change in the IIEF-EF in the monthly schedule was 4.3 (+/-6.7), 1.9 (+/-6.5) in the weekly schedule, and 5.0 (+/-6.1) in the reinforcement schedule ( p=0.0086). At the end of therapy and at 3 months the change in the IIEF-EF was 3.2 (+/-5.8) and 2.9 (+/-5.5) in the monthly group, 2.7 (+/-4.5) and 3.0 (+/-5.3) in the weekly one, and 4.2 (+/-6.4) and 4.4 (+/-6.5) in the reinforcement one. No differences were found between the groups in the proportion of patients who increased at least one point in erection hardness, nor in the average in the SEAR questionnaire in the evaluations carried out. No patient reported adverse effects to the therapy.\n \n \n \n The results suggest that monthly and reinforcement wave schemes present good results for the treatment of ED.\n \n \n \n \n Boston Medical Group.\n","PeriodicalId":377411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","volume":"123 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(O-20) COMPARISON OF THREE SHOCKWAVE THERAPY PROTOCOLS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION\",\"authors\":\"H. Corredor, J. M. Martínez, C. Sandoval-Salinas, J. Barba, F. Patrón\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Multiple treatment modalities have been used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED), including focal shock waves. This therapy has demonstrated a short-term positive effect in patients who respond or not to PDE-5i, with variability in therapeutic protocols.\\n \\n \\n \\n To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 shock wave protocols for the treatment of ED.\\n \\n \\n \\n Randomized, multicenter clinical trial. 277 men with non-psychological ED, over 18 years of age, without cancer or major surgeries in the pelvic area or any neurological disease that affected their erectile function, were randomized to one of three groups: weekly (6 wave sessions (WS), 1 x wk), monthly (6 WS 1 x month) or reinforcement (6 WS, 1 x week + 5 sessions, 1 x month). The wave parameters were the same in all groups, no patient received medication. The primary outcome was the change in IIEF-EF score at 6 months of follow-up. The change in the IIEF at the end of therapy and at 3 months of follow-up, erection hardness with the EHS, self-esteem with the SEAR questionnaire, and side effects were also evaluated.\\n \\n \\n \\n 222 patients completed the study. In the 6-month evaluation, the average change in the IIEF-EF in the monthly schedule was 4.3 (+/-6.7), 1.9 (+/-6.5) in the weekly schedule, and 5.0 (+/-6.1) in the reinforcement schedule ( p=0.0086). At the end of therapy and at 3 months the change in the IIEF-EF was 3.2 (+/-5.8) and 2.9 (+/-5.5) in the monthly group, 2.7 (+/-4.5) and 3.0 (+/-5.3) in the weekly one, and 4.2 (+/-6.4) and 4.4 (+/-6.5) in the reinforcement one. No differences were found between the groups in the proportion of patients who increased at least one point in erection hardness, nor in the average in the SEAR questionnaire in the evaluations carried out. No patient reported adverse effects to the therapy.\\n \\n \\n \\n The results suggest that monthly and reinforcement wave schemes present good results for the treatment of ED.\\n \\n \\n \\n \\n Boston Medical Group.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":377411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"volume\":\"123 23\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Sexual Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae018.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前已有多种治疗方法用于治疗勃起功能障碍(ED),包括病灶冲击波。这种疗法在对 PDE-5i 有反应或无反应的患者中显示出短期的积极效果,但治疗方案各不相同。 评估三种冲击波方案治疗 ED 的效果。 随机多中心临床试验。277名患有非心理性ED的男性被随机分为三组:每周一次(6次冲击波治疗,每周1次)、每月一次(6次冲击波治疗,每月1次)或强化治疗(6次冲击波治疗,每周1次+5次治疗,每月1次)。各组的波参数均相同,没有患者接受药物治疗。主要结果是随访 6 个月时 IIEF-EF 评分的变化。此外,还评估了治疗结束时和随访 3 个月时 IIEF 的变化、EHS 的勃起硬度、SEAR 问卷的自尊以及副作用。 共有 222 名患者完成了研究。在 6 个月的评估中,每月计划的 IIEF-EF 平均变化为 4.3(+/-6.7),每周计划为 1.9(+/-6.5),强化计划为 5.0(+/-6.1)(P=0.0086)。治疗结束后和3个月时,每月治疗组的IIEF-EF变化分别为3.2(+/-5.8)和2.9(+/-5.5),每周治疗组分别为2.7(+/-4.5)和3.0(+/-5.3),强化治疗组分别为4.2(+/-6.4)和4.4(+/-6.5)。在勃起硬度至少增加一个点的患者比例方面,以及在所进行的评估中 SEAR 问卷的平均值方面,各组之间没有发现差异。没有患者报告治疗的不良反应。 研究结果表明,月波法和强化波法在治疗 ED 方面效果良好。 波士顿医疗集团
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(O-20) COMPARISON OF THREE SHOCKWAVE THERAPY PROTOCOLS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION
Multiple treatment modalities have been used to treat erectile dysfunction (ED), including focal shock waves. This therapy has demonstrated a short-term positive effect in patients who respond or not to PDE-5i, with variability in therapeutic protocols. To evaluate the effectiveness of 3 shock wave protocols for the treatment of ED. Randomized, multicenter clinical trial. 277 men with non-psychological ED, over 18 years of age, without cancer or major surgeries in the pelvic area or any neurological disease that affected their erectile function, were randomized to one of three groups: weekly (6 wave sessions (WS), 1 x wk), monthly (6 WS 1 x month) or reinforcement (6 WS, 1 x week + 5 sessions, 1 x month). The wave parameters were the same in all groups, no patient received medication. The primary outcome was the change in IIEF-EF score at 6 months of follow-up. The change in the IIEF at the end of therapy and at 3 months of follow-up, erection hardness with the EHS, self-esteem with the SEAR questionnaire, and side effects were also evaluated. 222 patients completed the study. In the 6-month evaluation, the average change in the IIEF-EF in the monthly schedule was 4.3 (+/-6.7), 1.9 (+/-6.5) in the weekly schedule, and 5.0 (+/-6.1) in the reinforcement schedule ( p=0.0086). At the end of therapy and at 3 months the change in the IIEF-EF was 3.2 (+/-5.8) and 2.9 (+/-5.5) in the monthly group, 2.7 (+/-4.5) and 3.0 (+/-5.3) in the weekly one, and 4.2 (+/-6.4) and 4.4 (+/-6.5) in the reinforcement one. No differences were found between the groups in the proportion of patients who increased at least one point in erection hardness, nor in the average in the SEAR questionnaire in the evaluations carried out. No patient reported adverse effects to the therapy. The results suggest that monthly and reinforcement wave schemes present good results for the treatment of ED. Boston Medical Group.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Delineating patient errors in an intracavernosal injection program. Cosmetic penile enhancement procedures: an SMSNA position statement. The relationship between female orgasmic disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and depression in Dominican women. Associated factors of vaginal laxity and female sexual function: a cross-sectional study. The effect of combination treatment with low-intensity shockwave therapy and daily tadalafil on severe erectile dysfunction: a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1