探讨不同文化背景下临床文化能力问卷的内容有效性

Jabeen Fayyaz, Kim Leighton, Maria Bajwa, Anshul Kumar, Isabel T. Gross, Suzie Kardong-Edgren
{"title":"探讨不同文化背景下临床文化能力问卷的内容有效性","authors":"Jabeen Fayyaz, Kim Leighton, Maria Bajwa, Anshul Kumar, Isabel T. Gross, Suzie Kardong-Edgren","doi":"10.54531/axgb5704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cultural competence is one component of effective communication between patients, families and healthcare professionals. Tools to assess physicians’ clinical cultural competencies need validity evidence. This paper describes Lawshe’s method for determining the Content Validity Index (CVI) for the Clinical Cultural Competence Questionnaire (CCCQ) for North America (NA), Pakistan (PK) and an international group (IG) using physician simulation educators (PSEs) for diverse cultures.\n Five simulation educators pilot-tested the CCCQ, and initial changes were made based on their feedback. A total of 10 PSEs experts from NA, 11 PSEs from PK and 10 PSEs from IG completed two rounds of validation testing using Lawshe’s CVI survey for the CCCQ. The PSEs rated each item of the CCCQ as ‘essential’, useful but not essential’ or ‘not useful’. Lawshe’s CVI was calculated for the initial CCCQ; the CCCQ was then modified for individual items, separately for each group, NA, PK and IG. The IG comprised PSEs from Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, KSA, UAE, Australia, Argentina, India and Israel.\n The survey response rate was 83.33% for NA and IG and 91.6% for PK, respectively. The CVI of the CCCQ in round 1 was 0.689 for NA, 0.545 for PK and 0.691 for IG. In the second round of the CCCQ, with modified items, the CVI was 0.89 for NA, 0.802 for PK and 0.862 for IG. The major modifications suggested by the PSEs were to remove the unnecessary items, e.g. demographic information and last medical school attended, as they were deemed unnecessary or reword them for better understanding and combine related items to reduce the length of the CCCQ survey. We also evaluated the comments of PSEs from NA, PK and IG to explore the similarities and differences in their opinions regarding the CCCQ tool items.\n Our research emphasizes the need to thoroughly examine questionnaire content in tools like the CCCQ to accurately capture the cultural competence knowledge, attitudes and skills crucial for healthcare providers in diverse settings.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the content validity of Clinical Cultural Competence Questionnaire in diverse cultures\",\"authors\":\"Jabeen Fayyaz, Kim Leighton, Maria Bajwa, Anshul Kumar, Isabel T. Gross, Suzie Kardong-Edgren\",\"doi\":\"10.54531/axgb5704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Cultural competence is one component of effective communication between patients, families and healthcare professionals. Tools to assess physicians’ clinical cultural competencies need validity evidence. This paper describes Lawshe’s method for determining the Content Validity Index (CVI) for the Clinical Cultural Competence Questionnaire (CCCQ) for North America (NA), Pakistan (PK) and an international group (IG) using physician simulation educators (PSEs) for diverse cultures.\\n Five simulation educators pilot-tested the CCCQ, and initial changes were made based on their feedback. A total of 10 PSEs experts from NA, 11 PSEs from PK and 10 PSEs from IG completed two rounds of validation testing using Lawshe’s CVI survey for the CCCQ. The PSEs rated each item of the CCCQ as ‘essential’, useful but not essential’ or ‘not useful’. Lawshe’s CVI was calculated for the initial CCCQ; the CCCQ was then modified for individual items, separately for each group, NA, PK and IG. The IG comprised PSEs from Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, KSA, UAE, Australia, Argentina, India and Israel.\\n The survey response rate was 83.33% for NA and IG and 91.6% for PK, respectively. The CVI of the CCCQ in round 1 was 0.689 for NA, 0.545 for PK and 0.691 for IG. In the second round of the CCCQ, with modified items, the CVI was 0.89 for NA, 0.802 for PK and 0.862 for IG. The major modifications suggested by the PSEs were to remove the unnecessary items, e.g. demographic information and last medical school attended, as they were deemed unnecessary or reword them for better understanding and combine related items to reduce the length of the CCCQ survey. We also evaluated the comments of PSEs from NA, PK and IG to explore the similarities and differences in their opinions regarding the CCCQ tool items.\\n Our research emphasizes the need to thoroughly examine questionnaire content in tools like the CCCQ to accurately capture the cultural competence knowledge, attitudes and skills crucial for healthcare providers in diverse settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54531/axgb5704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/axgb5704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化能力是患者、家属和医护人员之间有效沟通的一个组成部分。评估医生临床文化能力的工具需要有效性证据。本文介绍了 Lawshe 使用针对不同文化的医生模拟教育者 (PSE) 为北美 (NA)、巴基斯坦 (PK) 和一个国际团体 (IG) 确定临床文化能力问卷 (CCCQ) 的内容效度指数 (CVI) 的方法。五名模拟教育者对 CCCQ 进行了试点测试,并根据他们的反馈意见进行了初步修改。共有 10 名来自 NA 的 PSE 专家、11 名来自 PK 的 PSE 专家和 10 名来自 IG 的 PSE 专家使用 Lawshe 的 CVI 调查对 CCCQ 完成了两轮验证测试。PSE 将 CCCQ 的每个项目评为 "必要"、"有用但非必要 "或 "无用"。最初的 CCCQ 计算了 Lawshe 的 CVI,然后针对个别项目对 CCCQ 进行了修改,分别适用于 NA、PK 和 IG 组。IG 包括来自巴林、阿曼、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋、澳大利亚、阿根廷、印度和以色列的 PSE。NA 组和 IG 组的调查回复率分别为 83.33%,PK 组为 91.6%。在第一轮 CCCQ 调查中,NA 的 CVI 为 0.689,PK 为 0.545,IG 为 0.691。在经过修改的第二轮 CCCQ 中,NA 的 CVI 为 0.89,PK 为 0.802,IG 为 0.862。PSE 提出的主要修改建议是删除不必要的项目,如人口统计学信息和最后就读的医学院校,因为他们认为这些项目没有必要,或重新措辞以便更好地理解,以及合并相关项目以缩短 CCCQ 调查的长度。我们还评估了来自 NA、PK 和 IG 的 PSE 的意见,以探讨他们对 CCCQ 工具项目意见的异同。我们的研究强调,有必要对 CCCQ 等工具中的问卷内容进行彻底检查,以准确捕捉在不同环境中对医疗服务提供者至关重要的文化胜任能力知识、态度和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the content validity of Clinical Cultural Competence Questionnaire in diverse cultures
Cultural competence is one component of effective communication between patients, families and healthcare professionals. Tools to assess physicians’ clinical cultural competencies need validity evidence. This paper describes Lawshe’s method for determining the Content Validity Index (CVI) for the Clinical Cultural Competence Questionnaire (CCCQ) for North America (NA), Pakistan (PK) and an international group (IG) using physician simulation educators (PSEs) for diverse cultures. Five simulation educators pilot-tested the CCCQ, and initial changes were made based on their feedback. A total of 10 PSEs experts from NA, 11 PSEs from PK and 10 PSEs from IG completed two rounds of validation testing using Lawshe’s CVI survey for the CCCQ. The PSEs rated each item of the CCCQ as ‘essential’, useful but not essential’ or ‘not useful’. Lawshe’s CVI was calculated for the initial CCCQ; the CCCQ was then modified for individual items, separately for each group, NA, PK and IG. The IG comprised PSEs from Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, KSA, UAE, Australia, Argentina, India and Israel. The survey response rate was 83.33% for NA and IG and 91.6% for PK, respectively. The CVI of the CCCQ in round 1 was 0.689 for NA, 0.545 for PK and 0.691 for IG. In the second round of the CCCQ, with modified items, the CVI was 0.89 for NA, 0.802 for PK and 0.862 for IG. The major modifications suggested by the PSEs were to remove the unnecessary items, e.g. demographic information and last medical school attended, as they were deemed unnecessary or reword them for better understanding and combine related items to reduce the length of the CCCQ survey. We also evaluated the comments of PSEs from NA, PK and IG to explore the similarities and differences in their opinions regarding the CCCQ tool items. Our research emphasizes the need to thoroughly examine questionnaire content in tools like the CCCQ to accurately capture the cultural competence knowledge, attitudes and skills crucial for healthcare providers in diverse settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study Virtual reality versus webinar trans healthcare training for emergency medicine residents: a feasibility study Using Forum Theatre techniques in teaching and learning about professionalism and communication in healthcare Revising the ASPiH standards: reflections on the evolution of simulated practice Stress and resilience among military medical students completing a high-fidelity military medical simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1