动态数字射线肺功能测试:机器学习肺部研究替代方案

{"title":"动态数字射线肺功能测试:机器学习肺部研究替代方案","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Common diagnostic tests for pulmonary disorders include chest radiography and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Although essential, these tests only offer a static assessment. Chest dynamic digital radiography (DDR) integrates lung and diaphragm motion in one study with limited radiation exposure. DDR is relatively easy to obtain, but barriers to its clinical adoption include time-consuming manual analysis and unclear correlation with PFTs.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Can a machine learning pipeline automate DDR analysis? What is the strength of the relationship between PFT measures and automated DDR-based lung area measurements?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>PFT and DDR studies were obtained in 55 participants. We developed an analysis pipeline using convolutional neural networks capable of quantifying lung areas in DDR images to generate DDR-based PFTs (dPFTs). PFT and dPFT measures were correlated in patients with normal, obstructive, and restrictive lung physiology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed statistically significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 1 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), strong correlations between dPFT areas and PFT volumes, including total lung capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.764), FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>r</em> = 0.591), vital capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.763), and functional residual capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.756). Automated DDR and lung shape tracking revealed differences between normal, restrictive, and obstructive physiology using diaphragm curvature indices and strain analysis measurements. Linear regressions allowed for derivation of PFT values from dPFT measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Statistically significant correlations found between dPFTs and PFTs suggest that dPFTs can act as a surrogate to PFTs when these are not available or unable to be performed. This study contributes to the potential integration of DDR as a reliable alternative to PFTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":94286,"journal":{"name":"CHEST pulmonary","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000187/pdfft?md5=9d2d97c098696dc1a1baf8a3c6ae782b&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789224000187-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chpulm.2024.100052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Common diagnostic tests for pulmonary disorders include chest radiography and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Although essential, these tests only offer a static assessment. Chest dynamic digital radiography (DDR) integrates lung and diaphragm motion in one study with limited radiation exposure. DDR is relatively easy to obtain, but barriers to its clinical adoption include time-consuming manual analysis and unclear correlation with PFTs.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Can a machine learning pipeline automate DDR analysis? What is the strength of the relationship between PFT measures and automated DDR-based lung area measurements?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>PFT and DDR studies were obtained in 55 participants. We developed an analysis pipeline using convolutional neural networks capable of quantifying lung areas in DDR images to generate DDR-based PFTs (dPFTs). PFT and dPFT measures were correlated in patients with normal, obstructive, and restrictive lung physiology.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed statistically significant (<em>P</em> &lt; 1 × 10<sup>-6</sup>), strong correlations between dPFT areas and PFT volumes, including total lung capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.764), FEV<sub>1</sub> (<em>r</em> = 0.591), vital capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.763), and functional residual capacity (<em>r</em> = 0.756). Automated DDR and lung shape tracking revealed differences between normal, restrictive, and obstructive physiology using diaphragm curvature indices and strain analysis measurements. Linear regressions allowed for derivation of PFT values from dPFT measurements.</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>Statistically significant correlations found between dPFTs and PFTs suggest that dPFTs can act as a surrogate to PFTs when these are not available or unable to be performed. This study contributes to the potential integration of DDR as a reliable alternative to PFTs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000187/pdfft?md5=9d2d97c098696dc1a1baf8a3c6ae782b&pid=1-s2.0-S2949789224000187-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CHEST pulmonary\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST pulmonary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949789224000187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景肺部疾病的常见诊断检查包括胸片和肺功能检查(PFT)。尽管这些检查必不可少,但它们只能提供静态评估。胸部动态数字放射摄影(DDR)将肺和膈肌的运动整合到一项研究中,且辐射量有限。DDR 相对容易获得,但其临床应用的障碍包括人工分析耗时以及与 PFT 的相关性不明确。PFT测量值与基于DDR的自动肺面积测量值之间的关系强度如何?我们利用卷积神经网络开发了一个分析管道,能够量化 DDR 图像中的肺面积,从而生成基于 DDR 的 PFT(dPFT)。结果我们观察到 dPFT 面积和 PFT 容积之间存在显著的统计学相关性(P < 1 × 10-6),包括总肺活量(r = 0.764)、FEV1(r = 0.591)、生命容量(r = 0.763)和功能残余容量(r = 0.756)。自动 DDR 和肺形状跟踪利用膈肌曲率指数和应变分析测量结果显示了正常、限制性和阻塞性生理机能之间的差异。通过线性回归,可以从 dPFT 测量值推导出 PFT 值。释义在 dPFT 和 PFT 之间发现的统计学意义上的显著相关性表明,在没有或无法进行 PFT 时,dPFT 可以作为 PFT 的替代物。这项研究有助于将 DDR 潜在整合为 PFT 的可靠替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing

Background

Common diagnostic tests for pulmonary disorders include chest radiography and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). Although essential, these tests only offer a static assessment. Chest dynamic digital radiography (DDR) integrates lung and diaphragm motion in one study with limited radiation exposure. DDR is relatively easy to obtain, but barriers to its clinical adoption include time-consuming manual analysis and unclear correlation with PFTs.

Research Question

Can a machine learning pipeline automate DDR analysis? What is the strength of the relationship between PFT measures and automated DDR-based lung area measurements?

Study Design and Methods

PFT and DDR studies were obtained in 55 participants. We developed an analysis pipeline using convolutional neural networks capable of quantifying lung areas in DDR images to generate DDR-based PFTs (dPFTs). PFT and dPFT measures were correlated in patients with normal, obstructive, and restrictive lung physiology.

Results

We observed statistically significant (P < 1 × 10-6), strong correlations between dPFT areas and PFT volumes, including total lung capacity (r = 0.764), FEV1 (r = 0.591), vital capacity (r = 0.763), and functional residual capacity (r = 0.756). Automated DDR and lung shape tracking revealed differences between normal, restrictive, and obstructive physiology using diaphragm curvature indices and strain analysis measurements. Linear regressions allowed for derivation of PFT values from dPFT measurements.

Interpretation

Statistically significant correlations found between dPFTs and PFTs suggest that dPFTs can act as a surrogate to PFTs when these are not available or unable to be performed. This study contributes to the potential integration of DDR as a reliable alternative to PFTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Association of Male Sex With Worse Right Ventricular Function and Survival in Pulmonary Hypertension in the Redefining Pulmonary Hypertension Through Pulmonary Vascular Disease Phenomics Cohort Adapting the Tools of Our Trade Dynamic Digital Radiography Pulmonary Function Testing Annual Adherence of Asian American Individuals in a Lung Cancer Screening Program Compared With Other Racial Groups Strategies for the Management of a Pulmonary Function Laboratory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1