中国城市社区慢性肾病患者肾衰竭风险方程的外部验证

IF 3.2 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Kidney Medicine Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100817
Ling Pan , Jinwei Wang , Yang Deng , Yexiang Sun , Zhenyu Nie , Xiaoyu Sun , Chao Yang , Guohui Ding , Ming-Hui Zhao , Yunhua Liao , Luxia Zhang
{"title":"中国城市社区慢性肾病患者肾衰竭风险方程的外部验证","authors":"Ling Pan ,&nbsp;Jinwei Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Deng ,&nbsp;Yexiang Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Nie ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Sun ,&nbsp;Chao Yang ,&nbsp;Guohui Ding ,&nbsp;Ming-Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Yunhua Liao ,&nbsp;Luxia Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The Kidney Failure Risk Equations have been proven to perform well in multinational databases, whereas validation in Asian populations is lacking. This study sought to externally validate the equations in a community-based chronic kidney disease cohort in China.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Patients with and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt; 60<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup> dwelling in an industrialized coastal city of China.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Age, sex, eGFR, and albuminuria were included in the 4-variable model, whereas serum calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, and albumin levels were added to the previously noted variables in the 8-variable model.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><p>Initiation of long-term dialysis treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated by Harrell’s C statistic, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4,587 participants were enrolled for validation of the 4-variable model, whereas 1,414 were enrolled for the 8-variable model. The median times of follow-up were 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.6-6.3) years for the 4-variable model and 3.4 (2.2-5.6) years for the 8-variable model. For the 4-variable model, the C statistics were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.615-0.885) for the 2-year model and 0.766 (0.625-0.907) for the 5-year model, whereas the values were 0.756 (0.629-0.883) and 0.774 (0.641-0.907), respectively, for the 8-variable model. Calibration was acceptable for both the 4-variable and 8-variable models. Decision curve analysis for the models at the 5-year scale performed better throughout different net benefit thresholds than the eGFR-based (&lt;30<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup>) strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>A large proportion of patients lack albuminuria measurements, and only a subset of population could provide complete data for the 8-variable equation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The kidney failure risk equations showed acceptable discrimination and calibration and better clinical utility than the eGFR-based strategy for incidence of kidney failure among community-based urban Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Accurate and reliable risk evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) prognosis can be helpful for physicians to make decisions concerning treatment opportunity and therapeutic strategy. The kidney failure risk equation is an outstanding model for predicting risk of kidney failure among patients with CKD. However, the equation is lacking validation among Chinese populations. In the current study, we demonstrated that the equation had good discrimination among an urban community-based cohort of patients with CKD in China. The calibration was also acceptable. Decision curve analysis also showed that the equation performed better than a traditional kidney function-based strategy. The results provide the basis for using predictions derived from the kidney failure risk equation to improve the management of patients with CKD in community settings in China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17885,"journal":{"name":"Kidney Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000281/pdfft?md5=e3746bf0072de8cf7641cb8f9de6a004&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000281-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External Validation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation Among Urban Community-Based Chinese Patients With CKD\",\"authors\":\"Ling Pan ,&nbsp;Jinwei Wang ,&nbsp;Yang Deng ,&nbsp;Yexiang Sun ,&nbsp;Zhenyu Nie ,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Sun ,&nbsp;Chao Yang ,&nbsp;Guohui Ding ,&nbsp;Ming-Hui Zhao ,&nbsp;Yunhua Liao ,&nbsp;Luxia Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale &amp; Objective</h3><p>The Kidney Failure Risk Equations have been proven to perform well in multinational databases, whereas validation in Asian populations is lacking. This study sought to externally validate the equations in a community-based chronic kidney disease cohort in China.</p></div><div><h3>Study Design</h3><p>A retrospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting &amp; Participants</h3><p>Patients with and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) &lt; 60<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup> dwelling in an industrialized coastal city of China.</p></div><div><h3>Exposure</h3><p>Age, sex, eGFR, and albuminuria were included in the 4-variable model, whereas serum calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, and albumin levels were added to the previously noted variables in the 8-variable model.</p></div><div><h3>Outcome</h3><p>Initiation of long-term dialysis treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Analytical Approach</h3><p>Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated by Harrell’s C statistic, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis, respectively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4,587 participants were enrolled for validation of the 4-variable model, whereas 1,414 were enrolled for the 8-variable model. The median times of follow-up were 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.6-6.3) years for the 4-variable model and 3.4 (2.2-5.6) years for the 8-variable model. For the 4-variable model, the C statistics were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.615-0.885) for the 2-year model and 0.766 (0.625-0.907) for the 5-year model, whereas the values were 0.756 (0.629-0.883) and 0.774 (0.641-0.907), respectively, for the 8-variable model. Calibration was acceptable for both the 4-variable and 8-variable models. Decision curve analysis for the models at the 5-year scale performed better throughout different net benefit thresholds than the eGFR-based (&lt;30<!--> <!-->mL/min/1.73<!--> <!-->m<sup>2</sup>) strategy.</p></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><p>A large proportion of patients lack albuminuria measurements, and only a subset of population could provide complete data for the 8-variable equation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The kidney failure risk equations showed acceptable discrimination and calibration and better clinical utility than the eGFR-based strategy for incidence of kidney failure among community-based urban Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.</p></div><div><h3>Plain-Language Summary</h3><p>Accurate and reliable risk evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) prognosis can be helpful for physicians to make decisions concerning treatment opportunity and therapeutic strategy. The kidney failure risk equation is an outstanding model for predicting risk of kidney failure among patients with CKD. However, the equation is lacking validation among Chinese populations. In the current study, we demonstrated that the equation had good discrimination among an urban community-based cohort of patients with CKD in China. The calibration was also acceptable. Decision curve analysis also showed that the equation performed better than a traditional kidney function-based strategy. The results provide the basis for using predictions derived from the kidney failure risk equation to improve the management of patients with CKD in community settings in China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000281/pdfft?md5=e3746bf0072de8cf7641cb8f9de6a004&pid=1-s2.0-S2590059524000281-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kidney Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kidney Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590059524000281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论依据和目的肾衰竭风险方程在跨国数据库中已被证明表现良好,但在亚洲人群中却缺乏验证。本研究试图在中国一个基于社区的慢性肾脏病队列中对该方程进行外部验证。暴露年龄、性别、eGFR 和白蛋白尿被纳入 4 变量模型,而血清钙、磷酸盐、碳酸氢盐和白蛋白水平被添加到 8 变量模型中。结果开始长期透析治疗。分析方法通过哈雷尔 C 统计量、校准图和决策曲线分析分别评估了模型的区分度、校准度和临床实用性。4 变量模型的中位随访时间为 4.0 年(四分位间范围:2.6-6.3),8 变量模型的中位随访时间为 3.4 年(2.2-5.6)。在 4 变量模型中,2 年模型的 C 统计量为 0.750(95% CI:0.615-0.885),5 年模型的 C 统计量为 0.766(0.625-0.907),而 8 变量模型的 C 统计量分别为 0.756(0.629-0.883)和 0.774(0.641-0.907)。4 变量模型和 8 变量模型的校准结果均可接受。与基于 eGFR(30 mL/min/1.73 m2)的策略相比,这些模型在不同净获益阈值下的 5 年决策曲线分析效果更好。结论与基于 eGFR 的策略相比,肾衰竭风险方程对基于社区的中国城市慢性肾脏病患者肾衰竭发生率显示出可接受的区分度和校准性,以及更好的临床实用性。肾衰竭风险方程是预测 CKD 患者肾衰竭风险的杰出模型。然而,该方程在中国人群中缺乏验证。在本次研究中,我们证明了该方程在中国城市社区的 CKD 患者队列中具有良好的区分度。校准也是可以接受的。决策曲线分析也表明,该方程的表现优于传统的基于肾功能的策略。这些结果为利用肾衰竭风险方程得出的预测结果改善中国社区 CKD 患者的管理提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
External Validation of the Kidney Failure Risk Equation Among Urban Community-Based Chinese Patients With CKD

Rationale & Objective

The Kidney Failure Risk Equations have been proven to perform well in multinational databases, whereas validation in Asian populations is lacking. This study sought to externally validate the equations in a community-based chronic kidney disease cohort in China.

Study Design

A retrospective cohort study.

Setting & Participants

Patients with and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 dwelling in an industrialized coastal city of China.

Exposure

Age, sex, eGFR, and albuminuria were included in the 4-variable model, whereas serum calcium, phosphate, bicarbonate, and albumin levels were added to the previously noted variables in the 8-variable model.

Outcome

Initiation of long-term dialysis treatment.

Analytical Approach

Model discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated by Harrell’s C statistic, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis, respectively.

Results

A total of 4,587 participants were enrolled for validation of the 4-variable model, whereas 1,414 were enrolled for the 8-variable model. The median times of follow-up were 4.0 (interquartile range: 2.6-6.3) years for the 4-variable model and 3.4 (2.2-5.6) years for the 8-variable model. For the 4-variable model, the C statistics were 0.750 (95% CI: 0.615-0.885) for the 2-year model and 0.766 (0.625-0.907) for the 5-year model, whereas the values were 0.756 (0.629-0.883) and 0.774 (0.641-0.907), respectively, for the 8-variable model. Calibration was acceptable for both the 4-variable and 8-variable models. Decision curve analysis for the models at the 5-year scale performed better throughout different net benefit thresholds than the eGFR-based (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2) strategy.

Limitations

A large proportion of patients lack albuminuria measurements, and only a subset of population could provide complete data for the 8-variable equation.

Conclusions

The kidney failure risk equations showed acceptable discrimination and calibration and better clinical utility than the eGFR-based strategy for incidence of kidney failure among community-based urban Chinese patients with chronic kidney disease.

Plain-Language Summary

Accurate and reliable risk evaluation of chronic kidney disease (CKD) prognosis can be helpful for physicians to make decisions concerning treatment opportunity and therapeutic strategy. The kidney failure risk equation is an outstanding model for predicting risk of kidney failure among patients with CKD. However, the equation is lacking validation among Chinese populations. In the current study, we demonstrated that the equation had good discrimination among an urban community-based cohort of patients with CKD in China. The calibration was also acceptable. Decision curve analysis also showed that the equation performed better than a traditional kidney function-based strategy. The results provide the basis for using predictions derived from the kidney failure risk equation to improve the management of patients with CKD in community settings in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kidney Medicine
Kidney Medicine Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Living Donor Candidates’ Self-reported Health and Health Perceptions and Completion of Donor Evaluation: A Cohort Study Undetected Air Embolism During Hemodialysis from a Defective Central Venous Catheter Causing Intradialytic Cardiac Arrest: An Imaging Teaching Case The Surprise Question in Hemodialysis, Frailty, Nutrition, Patient-reported Quality of Life, and All-Cause Mortality: The Osaka Dialysis Complication Study (ODCS) Antihypertensive Treatment Patterns in CKD Stages 3 and 4: The CKD-REIN Cohort Study Advanced CKD of Uncertain Etiology Among Children in Guatemala: Genetic and Clinical Characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1