人工智能在头侧测量分析中的可靠性

Nouran Hesham Emad, Mostafa Ashmawy, Sahar Samir
{"title":"人工智能在头侧测量分析中的可靠性","authors":"Nouran Hesham Emad, Mostafa Ashmawy, Sahar Samir","doi":"10.21608/asdj.2024.260733.1200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of lateral cephalometric analysis performed by an artificial intelligence-dependent software program. Materials and Methods: One Hundred and Eighty digital cephalometric radiographs acquired by Vatech PaX-i X-ray machine, were used in the study. The anatomical landmarks of both Steiner and McNamara analyses were manually traced using a third-party software AudaxCeph Empower, version 6.6.12.4731 (Audax d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), the tracing was performed by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in digital cephalometry to determine the inter-reliability, then it was repeated with an interval of two weeks to determine the intra-reliability. The landmarks were retraced automatically through the fully automatic option on the same software program using convolutional neural network. Results: Regarding McNamara analysis, the results of this study showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements, with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Regarding Steiner analysis, our results showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements (0.75<ICC<1 excluding Positive 1/SN degree, Negative 1i/NB mm, Pg/NB mm, and S-L point mm, which show moderate reliability with 0.4<ICC<0.74). Two measurements showed poor reliability (Holdaway ratio and S-E point mm). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the AudaxCeph automated software program has excellent reliability regarding McNamara and Steiner analyses. While in Steiner analysis, manual confirmation should be made with some dental landmarks.","PeriodicalId":505319,"journal":{"name":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Nouran Hesham Emad, Mostafa Ashmawy, Sahar Samir\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/asdj.2024.260733.1200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of lateral cephalometric analysis performed by an artificial intelligence-dependent software program. Materials and Methods: One Hundred and Eighty digital cephalometric radiographs acquired by Vatech PaX-i X-ray machine, were used in the study. The anatomical landmarks of both Steiner and McNamara analyses were manually traced using a third-party software AudaxCeph Empower, version 6.6.12.4731 (Audax d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), the tracing was performed by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in digital cephalometry to determine the inter-reliability, then it was repeated with an interval of two weeks to determine the intra-reliability. The landmarks were retraced automatically through the fully automatic option on the same software program using convolutional neural network. Results: Regarding McNamara analysis, the results of this study showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements, with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Regarding Steiner analysis, our results showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements (0.75<ICC<1 excluding Positive 1/SN degree, Negative 1i/NB mm, Pg/NB mm, and S-L point mm, which show moderate reliability with 0.4<ICC<0.74). Two measurements showed poor reliability (Holdaway ratio and S-E point mm). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the AudaxCeph automated software program has excellent reliability regarding McNamara and Steiner analyses. While in Steiner analysis, manual confirmation should be made with some dental landmarks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ain Shams Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.260733.1200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ain Shams Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/asdj.2024.260733.1200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估由人工智能软件程序进行的侧向头颅测量分析的可靠性。材料与方法:研究使用了 180 张由 Vatech PaX-i X 光机采集的数字头颅X光片。使用第三方软件 AudaxCeph Empower(版本 6.6.12.4731,Audax d.o.o.,斯洛文尼亚卢布尔雅那)手动描记 Steiner 和 McNamara 分析的解剖地标,描记工作由两名在数字头颅测量方面有 5 年以上经验的放射科医生完成,以确定可靠度,然后每隔两周重复一次,以确定可靠度。通过同一软件程序的全自动选项,使用卷积神经网络对地标进行自动描记。结果在麦克纳马拉分析方面,研究结果表明人工智能测量与人工测量相比具有极佳的可靠性,类间相关系数大于 0.9。在斯坦纳分析方面,我们的结果显示人工智能测量结果与人工测量结果相比具有极佳的可靠性(0.75本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of Artificial Intelligence in Lateral Cephalometric Analysis
Aim: The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of lateral cephalometric analysis performed by an artificial intelligence-dependent software program. Materials and Methods: One Hundred and Eighty digital cephalometric radiographs acquired by Vatech PaX-i X-ray machine, were used in the study. The anatomical landmarks of both Steiner and McNamara analyses were manually traced using a third-party software AudaxCeph Empower, version 6.6.12.4731 (Audax d.o.o., Ljubljana, Slovenia), the tracing was performed by two radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in digital cephalometry to determine the inter-reliability, then it was repeated with an interval of two weeks to determine the intra-reliability. The landmarks were retraced automatically through the fully automatic option on the same software program using convolutional neural network. Results: Regarding McNamara analysis, the results of this study showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements, with an interclass correlation coefficient >0.9. Regarding Steiner analysis, our results showed excellent reliability of the artificial intelligence measurements compared to the manual measurements (0.75
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of Dental Stone Fluidity Properties, Compatibility with Impression Materials, and Detail Reproduction after Incorporation of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Solution Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of two Resilient Attachments Retaining Mandibular Over-Denture Supported by Implant and Natural Tooth on the Supporting Structures Evaluation of Different Post and Core Systems for Restoring Pulpectomized Primary Incisors: An In-Vitro Study A Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Children's Intelligence Quotient on Their Behavior and Anxiety in a Dental Setting Erythropoietin Gel as an adjunct to Xenograft in the Surgical Management of Intrabony Periodontal Defects :A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1