Tino Romeo Soglo, S. Inkoom, Francis Hasford, E. Sosu, Olivier Biaou
{"title":"在贝宁南部选定的 X 光机上首次实施质量控制程序","authors":"Tino Romeo Soglo, S. Inkoom, Francis Hasford, E. Sosu, Olivier Biaou","doi":"10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Introduction: The use of X-ray equipment for medical diagnostic radiography procedures has increased due to advances and complexity of radiological procedures. Achieving good image quality while keeping exposure of workers, public and patient exposure to an acceptable level has become a prerequisite for the radiology department in order to comply with best international practices. The aim of this study was to undertake quality control measurement of seven (7) diagnostic radiography equipment in the south of Benin, the first of its kind.\n \n Material and methods: Multifunction detector (Piranha) and beam alignment test tool were used to perform quality control tests on seven (7) X-ray units. The method used as well as the interpretation of the results was based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Healing Arts Radiation Protection (HARP), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Canadian Safety code 35 (S.C 35) recommendations.\n \n Results: The quality control results showed that all X-ray equipment investigated were within standard limits for accuracy of exposure time below 10 ms; reproducibility of kVp, exposure time and dose output; specific dose-kVp2 linearity; and specific dose-mAs linearity. Five (5) out of seven (7) diagnostic X-ray machines passed quality control tests such as X-ray beam alignment, exposure time above 10 ms and kVp accuracy. One (1) X-ray machine failed the quality control test of beam filtration at 70 kVp and above.\n \n Conclusions: The findings of this study have provided baseline data for other radiology departments to embark on similar QA/QC activities, and also explore options for optimization of patient dose. However, there is a need to extend the study to cover more diagnostic X-ray machines throughout the country. It is anticipated that this would ultimately assist in improving radiation protection and safety during medical diagnostic radiological procedures.","PeriodicalId":506987,"journal":{"name":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","volume":"313 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First implementation of quality control procedures on selected X-ray machines in South of Benin\",\"authors\":\"Tino Romeo Soglo, S. Inkoom, Francis Hasford, E. Sosu, Olivier Biaou\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n Introduction: The use of X-ray equipment for medical diagnostic radiography procedures has increased due to advances and complexity of radiological procedures. Achieving good image quality while keeping exposure of workers, public and patient exposure to an acceptable level has become a prerequisite for the radiology department in order to comply with best international practices. The aim of this study was to undertake quality control measurement of seven (7) diagnostic radiography equipment in the south of Benin, the first of its kind.\\n \\n Material and methods: Multifunction detector (Piranha) and beam alignment test tool were used to perform quality control tests on seven (7) X-ray units. The method used as well as the interpretation of the results was based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Healing Arts Radiation Protection (HARP), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Canadian Safety code 35 (S.C 35) recommendations.\\n \\n Results: The quality control results showed that all X-ray equipment investigated were within standard limits for accuracy of exposure time below 10 ms; reproducibility of kVp, exposure time and dose output; specific dose-kVp2 linearity; and specific dose-mAs linearity. Five (5) out of seven (7) diagnostic X-ray machines passed quality control tests such as X-ray beam alignment, exposure time above 10 ms and kVp accuracy. One (1) X-ray machine failed the quality control test of beam filtration at 70 kVp and above.\\n \\n Conclusions: The findings of this study have provided baseline data for other radiology departments to embark on similar QA/QC activities, and also explore options for optimization of patient dose. However, there is a need to extend the study to cover more diagnostic X-ray machines throughout the country. It is anticipated that this would ultimately assist in improving radiation protection and safety during medical diagnostic radiological procedures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":506987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"313 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/pjmpe-2024-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介由于放射诊断程序的进步和复杂性,X 射线设备在医疗放射诊断程序中的使用日益增多。要达到良好的图像质量,同时将工人、公众和病人的暴露量控制在可接受的水平,这已成为放射科遵守国际最佳做法的先决条件。本研究的目的是对贝宁南部的七(7)台放射诊断设备进行质量控制测量,这在同类研究中尚属首次。 材料和方法使用多功能探测器(Piranha)和光束对准测试工具对七(7)台 X 射线设备进行质量控制测试。使用的方法以及对结果的解释均基于美国医学物理学家协会 (AAPM)、美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA)、医疗艺术辐射防护 (HARP)、医学物理与工程研究所 (IPEM)、国际原子能机构 (IAEA) 和加拿大安全法规 35 (S.C 35) 的建议。 结果:质量控制结果表明,所有接受调查的 X 射线设备在以下方面均符合标准限值:曝光时间精确度低于 10 毫秒;kVp、曝光时间和剂量输出的再现性;比剂量-kVp2 线性;比剂量-mAs 线性。在七(7)台诊断 X 光机中,有五(5)台通过了质量控制测试,如 X 光束对准、10 毫秒以上的曝光时间和 kVp 精确度。有 1 台 X 光机未能通过 70 kVp 及以上的光束过滤质量控制测试。 结论这项研究的结果为其他放射科部门提供了基线数据,以便开展类似的质量保证/质量控制活动,并探索优化病人剂量的方案。不过,有必要扩大研究范围,以覆盖全国更多的诊断 X 光机。预计这将最终有助于改善医疗放射诊断过程中的辐射防护和安全。
First implementation of quality control procedures on selected X-ray machines in South of Benin
Introduction: The use of X-ray equipment for medical diagnostic radiography procedures has increased due to advances and complexity of radiological procedures. Achieving good image quality while keeping exposure of workers, public and patient exposure to an acceptable level has become a prerequisite for the radiology department in order to comply with best international practices. The aim of this study was to undertake quality control measurement of seven (7) diagnostic radiography equipment in the south of Benin, the first of its kind.
Material and methods: Multifunction detector (Piranha) and beam alignment test tool were used to perform quality control tests on seven (7) X-ray units. The method used as well as the interpretation of the results was based on the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Healing Arts Radiation Protection (HARP), Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine (IPEM), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and Canadian Safety code 35 (S.C 35) recommendations.
Results: The quality control results showed that all X-ray equipment investigated were within standard limits for accuracy of exposure time below 10 ms; reproducibility of kVp, exposure time and dose output; specific dose-kVp2 linearity; and specific dose-mAs linearity. Five (5) out of seven (7) diagnostic X-ray machines passed quality control tests such as X-ray beam alignment, exposure time above 10 ms and kVp accuracy. One (1) X-ray machine failed the quality control test of beam filtration at 70 kVp and above.
Conclusions: The findings of this study have provided baseline data for other radiology departments to embark on similar QA/QC activities, and also explore options for optimization of patient dose. However, there is a need to extend the study to cover more diagnostic X-ray machines throughout the country. It is anticipated that this would ultimately assist in improving radiation protection and safety during medical diagnostic radiological procedures.