复发或难治性急性髓细胞白血病老年患者Devimistat联合强化化疗与单独强化化疗的对比:随机III期ARMADA试验结果

Timothy S. Pardee , Bayard L. Powell , Richard A. Larson , Joseph Maly , Michael Keng , Matthew Foster , Eun-Ji Choi , Heinz Sill , Thomas Cluzeau , Deepa Jeyakumar , Olga Frankfurt , Prapti Patel , Michael Schuster , Elisabeth Koller , Regis Costello , Uwe Platzbecker , Pau Montesinos , Susana Vives , Aziz Nazha , Rachel Cook , Jorge Cortes
{"title":"复发或难治性急性髓细胞白血病老年患者Devimistat联合强化化疗与单独强化化疗的对比:随机III期ARMADA试验结果","authors":"Timothy S. Pardee ,&nbsp;Bayard L. Powell ,&nbsp;Richard A. Larson ,&nbsp;Joseph Maly ,&nbsp;Michael Keng ,&nbsp;Matthew Foster ,&nbsp;Eun-Ji Choi ,&nbsp;Heinz Sill ,&nbsp;Thomas Cluzeau ,&nbsp;Deepa Jeyakumar ,&nbsp;Olga Frankfurt ,&nbsp;Prapti Patel ,&nbsp;Michael Schuster ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Koller ,&nbsp;Regis Costello ,&nbsp;Uwe Platzbecker ,&nbsp;Pau Montesinos ,&nbsp;Susana Vives ,&nbsp;Aziz Nazha ,&nbsp;Rachel Cook ,&nbsp;Jorge Cortes","doi":"10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer of the myeloid lineage. Outcomes in older patients are poor, with high rates of resistant and relapsed disease. Devimistat is a lipoic acid analog that inhibits mitochondrial metabolism. Devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone resulted in promising phase 1 and 2 response rates especially in older patients. Therefore, the phase 3 ARMADA 2000 trial was conducted in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. The study randomized patients between devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (CHAM) or 1 of 3 control treatment regimens without devimistat: high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim. Overall, 265 patients consented to participate from 56 sites across 11 countries, and 200 patients were randomized, 98 patients to the devimistat arm and 102 patients to the control arm. The safety profile was consistent with high-dose cytarabine–based salvage regimens. There were 18 (9%) deaths on study (11 on CHAM and 7 on control). The study failed to meet its primary end point, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 20.4% in the devimistat arm compared with 21.6% in the control arm (<em>P</em> = .57). Overall survival was not statistically significantly different between the study arms, with a median of 8.9 months in the CHAM arm compared with 6.2 months in the control arm (<em>P</em> = .62). In conclusion, devimistat added to chemotherapy did not improve the CR rate or survival in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. This trial was registered at <span>www.ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> as #NCT03504410.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100189,"journal":{"name":"Blood Neoplasia","volume":"1 2","pages":"Article 100009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000098/pdfft?md5=8d5513d5e2eee809a51383d73851adc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2950328024000098-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Devimistat plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for older relapsed or refractory patients with AML: results of the ARMADA trial\",\"authors\":\"Timothy S. Pardee ,&nbsp;Bayard L. Powell ,&nbsp;Richard A. Larson ,&nbsp;Joseph Maly ,&nbsp;Michael Keng ,&nbsp;Matthew Foster ,&nbsp;Eun-Ji Choi ,&nbsp;Heinz Sill ,&nbsp;Thomas Cluzeau ,&nbsp;Deepa Jeyakumar ,&nbsp;Olga Frankfurt ,&nbsp;Prapti Patel ,&nbsp;Michael Schuster ,&nbsp;Elisabeth Koller ,&nbsp;Regis Costello ,&nbsp;Uwe Platzbecker ,&nbsp;Pau Montesinos ,&nbsp;Susana Vives ,&nbsp;Aziz Nazha ,&nbsp;Rachel Cook ,&nbsp;Jorge Cortes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><p>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer of the myeloid lineage. Outcomes in older patients are poor, with high rates of resistant and relapsed disease. Devimistat is a lipoic acid analog that inhibits mitochondrial metabolism. Devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone resulted in promising phase 1 and 2 response rates especially in older patients. Therefore, the phase 3 ARMADA 2000 trial was conducted in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. The study randomized patients between devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (CHAM) or 1 of 3 control treatment regimens without devimistat: high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim. Overall, 265 patients consented to participate from 56 sites across 11 countries, and 200 patients were randomized, 98 patients to the devimistat arm and 102 patients to the control arm. The safety profile was consistent with high-dose cytarabine–based salvage regimens. There were 18 (9%) deaths on study (11 on CHAM and 7 on control). The study failed to meet its primary end point, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 20.4% in the devimistat arm compared with 21.6% in the control arm (<em>P</em> = .57). Overall survival was not statistically significantly different between the study arms, with a median of 8.9 months in the CHAM arm compared with 6.2 months in the control arm (<em>P</em> = .62). In conclusion, devimistat added to chemotherapy did not improve the CR rate or survival in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. This trial was registered at <span>www.ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> as #NCT03504410.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"volume\":\"1 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100009\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000098/pdfft?md5=8d5513d5e2eee809a51383d73851adc6&pid=1-s2.0-S2950328024000098-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000098\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 急性髓性白血病(AML)是一种侵袭性髓系癌症。老年患者的治疗效果很差,耐药和复发率很高。Devimistat是一种硫辛酸类似物,可抑制线粒体代谢。Devimistat 与大剂量阿糖胞苷和米托蒽醌联用后,第一和第二阶段的应答率很高,尤其是在老年患者中。因此,ARMADA 2000 第三期试验在年龄≥50 岁的复发或难治性急性髓细胞白血病患者中进行。该研究将患者随机分为两种治疗方案,一种是 devimistat 与大剂量阿糖胞苷和米托蒽醌联合治疗(CHAM),另一种是不使用 devimistat 的 3 种对照治疗方案中的一种:大剂量阿糖胞苷和米托蒽醌;米托蒽醌、依托泊苷和阿糖胞苷;或氟达拉滨、阿糖胞苷和非格司亭。共有来自11个国家56个研究机构的265名患者同意参加这项研究,200名患者被随机分配,其中98名患者被分配到devimistat治疗组,102名患者被分配到对照组。该疗法的安全性与基于大剂量阿糖胞苷的抢救方案一致。研究中出现了 18 例(9%)死亡病例(11 例死于 CHAM,7 例死于对照组)。研究未能达到主要终点,devimistat治疗组的完全缓解(CR)率为20.4%,而对照组为21.6%(P = .57)。研究臂之间的总生存期无明显统计学差异,CHAM研究臂的中位生存期为8.9个月,对照组为6.2个月(P = .62)。总之,对于年龄≥50岁的复发或难治性急性髓细胞性白血病患者,在化疗中添加 devimistat 并不能提高 CR 率或生存率。该试验已在 www.ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,注册号为 #NCT03504410。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Devimistat plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone for older relapsed or refractory patients with AML: results of the ARMADA trial

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer of the myeloid lineage. Outcomes in older patients are poor, with high rates of resistant and relapsed disease. Devimistat is a lipoic acid analog that inhibits mitochondrial metabolism. Devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone resulted in promising phase 1 and 2 response rates especially in older patients. Therefore, the phase 3 ARMADA 2000 trial was conducted in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. The study randomized patients between devimistat combined with high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone (CHAM) or 1 of 3 control treatment regimens without devimistat: high-dose cytarabine and mitoxantrone; mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine; or fludarabine, cytarabine, and filgrastim. Overall, 265 patients consented to participate from 56 sites across 11 countries, and 200 patients were randomized, 98 patients to the devimistat arm and 102 patients to the control arm. The safety profile was consistent with high-dose cytarabine–based salvage regimens. There were 18 (9%) deaths on study (11 on CHAM and 7 on control). The study failed to meet its primary end point, with a complete remission (CR) rate of 20.4% in the devimistat arm compared with 21.6% in the control arm (P = .57). Overall survival was not statistically significantly different between the study arms, with a median of 8.9 months in the CHAM arm compared with 6.2 months in the control arm (P = .62). In conclusion, devimistat added to chemotherapy did not improve the CR rate or survival in patients aged ≥50 years with relapsed or refractory AML. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03504410.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pharmacological targeting of CBX7 alters the epigenetic landscape and induces differentiation of leukemic cells Predictors of response to venetoclax and therapeutic potential of CDK7 inhibition in multiple myeloma Development and characterization of a low-affinity humanized CD19 chimeric antigen receptor for B-cell malignancies Deciphering MARCH5’s impact on multiple myeloma: insights into autophagy regulation and AKT-FOXO3 signaling Outcomes for high-risk defining events in follicular lymphoma following frontline immunochemotherapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1