接受手术的患有慢性阻塞性肺病的肺癌患者肺动脉扩张的意义

{"title":"接受手术的患有慢性阻塞性肺病的肺癌患者肺动脉扩张的意义","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.03.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The significance of pulmonary artery (PA) diameter in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who undergo pulmonary resection has not been elucidated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data of 357 patients with NSCLC and COPD who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively reviewed. The main PA diameter, determined by preoperative computed tomography, relative to the body surface area (PBR), was used as an index of PA dilatation, and patients were divided into 2 groups using median values. The relationship between the PBR and short- and long-term outcomes was also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age was 70.8 years, and 82% of the patients were men. The median main PA diameter was 24 mm (range, 17-43 mm), and the median PBR was 14.5 (range, 10.4-28.6). Lobectomy or more was performed in 276 patients (78%) and sublobar resection in 81 patients (22%). The postoperative complication rates did not differ between the low- and high-PBR groups (33% vs 32%, <em>P</em> = .91). The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of the low-PBR group were significantly better than those of the high-PBR group (5-year RFS: 76% vs 59%, <em>P</em> = .0003; 5-year OS: 88% vs 72%, <em>P</em> = .0010). A multivariable analysis identified high PBR as a poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PA dilatation was associated with poor long-term outcomes and was an independent poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS in NSCLC patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary resection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72234,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","volume":"2 3","pages":"Pages 448-452"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001244/pdfft?md5=bc453a5ca3d467f4ac0ca60aec947fef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001244-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of Pulmonary Artery Dilatation in Lung Cancer Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Underwent Pulmonary Resection\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.atssr.2024.03.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The significance of pulmonary artery (PA) diameter in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who undergo pulmonary resection has not been elucidated.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data of 357 patients with NSCLC and COPD who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively reviewed. The main PA diameter, determined by preoperative computed tomography, relative to the body surface area (PBR), was used as an index of PA dilatation, and patients were divided into 2 groups using median values. The relationship between the PBR and short- and long-term outcomes was also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean age was 70.8 years, and 82% of the patients were men. The median main PA diameter was 24 mm (range, 17-43 mm), and the median PBR was 14.5 (range, 10.4-28.6). Lobectomy or more was performed in 276 patients (78%) and sublobar resection in 81 patients (22%). The postoperative complication rates did not differ between the low- and high-PBR groups (33% vs 32%, <em>P</em> = .91). The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of the low-PBR group were significantly better than those of the high-PBR group (5-year RFS: 76% vs 59%, <em>P</em> = .0003; 5-year OS: 88% vs 72%, <em>P</em> = .0010). A multivariable analysis identified high PBR as a poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>PA dilatation was associated with poor long-term outcomes and was an independent poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS in NSCLC patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary resection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 448-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001244/pdfft?md5=bc453a5ca3d467f4ac0ca60aec947fef&pid=1-s2.0-S2772993124001244-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic surgery short reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772993124001244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景对接受肺切除术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的肺动脉(PA)直径的意义尚未阐明。方法回顾性研究了357例接受肺切除术的NSCLC和COPD患者的数据。用术前计算机断层扫描确定的相对于体表面积(PBR)的主肺动脉瓣直径作为肺动脉瓣扩张的指标,并用中位值将患者分为两组。结果平均年龄为 70.8 岁,82% 的患者为男性。主PA直径中位数为24毫米(范围为17-43毫米),PBR中位数为14.5(范围为10.4-28.6)。276名患者(78%)接受了肺叶切除或更多切除术,81名患者(22%)接受了肺叶下切除术。低PBR组和高PBR组的术后并发症发生率没有差异(33% vs 32%,P = .91)。低PBR组的无复发生存率(RFS)和总生存率(OS)明显优于高PBR组(5年RFS:76% vs 59%,P = .0003;5年OS:88% vs 72%,P = .0010)。结论 在接受肺切除术的 COPD NSCLC 患者中,PA 扩张与不良的长期预后有关,是 RFS 和 OS 的独立不良预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Significance of Pulmonary Artery Dilatation in Lung Cancer Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Who Underwent Pulmonary Resection

Background

The significance of pulmonary artery (PA) diameter in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who undergo pulmonary resection has not been elucidated.

Methods

Data of 357 patients with NSCLC and COPD who underwent pulmonary resection were retrospectively reviewed. The main PA diameter, determined by preoperative computed tomography, relative to the body surface area (PBR), was used as an index of PA dilatation, and patients were divided into 2 groups using median values. The relationship between the PBR and short- and long-term outcomes was also analyzed.

Results

The mean age was 70.8 years, and 82% of the patients were men. The median main PA diameter was 24 mm (range, 17-43 mm), and the median PBR was 14.5 (range, 10.4-28.6). Lobectomy or more was performed in 276 patients (78%) and sublobar resection in 81 patients (22%). The postoperative complication rates did not differ between the low- and high-PBR groups (33% vs 32%, P = .91). The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of the low-PBR group were significantly better than those of the high-PBR group (5-year RFS: 76% vs 59%, P = .0003; 5-year OS: 88% vs 72%, P = .0010). A multivariable analysis identified high PBR as a poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS.

Conclusions

PA dilatation was associated with poor long-term outcomes and was an independent poor prognostic factor for both RFS and OS in NSCLC patients with COPD who underwent pulmonary resection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
53 days
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Perceptions of Frailty and Prehabilitation Among Thoracic Surgeons: Findings From a National Survey Pulmonary Artery Vasa Vasorum Damage in Severe COVID-19–Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Single-Stage Surgical Approach to Aortoesophageal Fistula After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1