逆行球囊拉通技术治疗良性食管狭窄:单中心试点经验--(附视频)

iGIE Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.igie.2024.03.002
Shae Patel DO , Andrew Wright MD , Paul Leonor MD , Wasseem Skef MD
{"title":"逆行球囊拉通技术治疗良性食管狭窄:单中心试点经验--(附视频)","authors":"Shae Patel DO ,&nbsp;Andrew Wright MD ,&nbsp;Paul Leonor MD ,&nbsp;Wasseem Skef MD","doi":"10.1016/j.igie.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Antegrade savary dilation and static balloon dilation are the mainstays of management of simple and complex benign esophageal strictures (BESs). A modified technique, termed retrograde balloon dilation, has potential advantages for the management of BESs. Efficacy and safety data on this technique are limited. We report a single-center experience of retrograde balloon dilation for BESs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study evaluating retrograde balloon and antegrade savary dilation for BESs in 53 unique patients who met inclusion criteria, including 23 undergoing a retrograde balloon pull-through technique and 30 undergoing antegrade savary dilation. The primary endpoint was technical success, defined as achieving a luminal diameter of ≥16 mm. Secondary endpoints were repeat dilation rates within 1 year after achieving therapeutic endpoint dilation and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Technical success was achieved in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) with the retrograde balloon pull-through technique and in all 30 patients (100%) with antegrade savary dilation (<em>P</em> = .434). A nonsignificant trend of lower repeat dilation rates was present for the retrograde balloon pull-through group, with 4 of 22 in the retrograde balloon pull-through group versus 12 of 30 in the antegrade savary dilation group (<em>P</em> = .076). Only 1 minor adverse event occurred in the retrograde balloon pull-through group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our experience suggests that retrograde balloon pull-through dilation is effective and safe for simple and complex benign esophageal stenosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100652,"journal":{"name":"iGIE","volume":"3 2","pages":"Pages 216-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000335/pdfft?md5=c4083a9bc45686b3c4a5dcfe96b649ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000335-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrograde balloon pull-through technique for benign esophageal strictures: a single-center pilot experience\",\"authors\":\"Shae Patel DO ,&nbsp;Andrew Wright MD ,&nbsp;Paul Leonor MD ,&nbsp;Wasseem Skef MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.igie.2024.03.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><p>Antegrade savary dilation and static balloon dilation are the mainstays of management of simple and complex benign esophageal strictures (BESs). A modified technique, termed retrograde balloon dilation, has potential advantages for the management of BESs. Efficacy and safety data on this technique are limited. We report a single-center experience of retrograde balloon dilation for BESs.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study evaluating retrograde balloon and antegrade savary dilation for BESs in 53 unique patients who met inclusion criteria, including 23 undergoing a retrograde balloon pull-through technique and 30 undergoing antegrade savary dilation. The primary endpoint was technical success, defined as achieving a luminal diameter of ≥16 mm. Secondary endpoints were repeat dilation rates within 1 year after achieving therapeutic endpoint dilation and adverse events.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Technical success was achieved in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) with the retrograde balloon pull-through technique and in all 30 patients (100%) with antegrade savary dilation (<em>P</em> = .434). A nonsignificant trend of lower repeat dilation rates was present for the retrograde balloon pull-through group, with 4 of 22 in the retrograde balloon pull-through group versus 12 of 30 in the antegrade savary dilation group (<em>P</em> = .076). Only 1 minor adverse event occurred in the retrograde balloon pull-through group.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our experience suggests that retrograde balloon pull-through dilation is effective and safe for simple and complex benign esophageal stenosis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100652,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"iGIE\",\"volume\":\"3 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 216-221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000335/pdfft?md5=c4083a9bc45686b3c4a5dcfe96b649ba&pid=1-s2.0-S2949708624000335-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"iGIE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iGIE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949708624000335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的逆行食管扩张术和静态球囊扩张术是治疗简单和复杂良性食管狭窄(BES)的主要方法。一种被称为逆行球囊扩张术的改良技术在治疗食管良性狭窄方面具有潜在优势。有关这种技术的有效性和安全性数据还很有限。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,评估了符合纳入标准的 53 名患者的逆行球囊和前向 savary 扩张术治疗 BES 的效果,其中 23 人接受了逆行球囊拉通技术,30 人接受了前向 savary 扩张术。主要终点是技术成功率,即管腔直径≥16 毫米。结果采用逆行球囊拉通技术的 23 例患者中有 22 例(95.7%)获得了技术成功,而采用顺行球囊扩张术的 30 例患者全部(100%)获得了技术成功(P = .434)。逆行球囊拉通组重复扩张率较低的趋势并不显著,逆行球囊拉通组 22 例中有 4 例重复扩张,而逆行球囊拉通组 30 例中有 12 例重复扩张(P = 0.076)。结论我们的经验表明,逆行球囊拉通扩张术对简单和复杂的良性食管狭窄有效且安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Retrograde balloon pull-through technique for benign esophageal strictures: a single-center pilot experience

Background and Aims

Antegrade savary dilation and static balloon dilation are the mainstays of management of simple and complex benign esophageal strictures (BESs). A modified technique, termed retrograde balloon dilation, has potential advantages for the management of BESs. Efficacy and safety data on this technique are limited. We report a single-center experience of retrograde balloon dilation for BESs.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study evaluating retrograde balloon and antegrade savary dilation for BESs in 53 unique patients who met inclusion criteria, including 23 undergoing a retrograde balloon pull-through technique and 30 undergoing antegrade savary dilation. The primary endpoint was technical success, defined as achieving a luminal diameter of ≥16 mm. Secondary endpoints were repeat dilation rates within 1 year after achieving therapeutic endpoint dilation and adverse events.

Results

Technical success was achieved in 22 of 23 patients (95.7%) with the retrograde balloon pull-through technique and in all 30 patients (100%) with antegrade savary dilation (P = .434). A nonsignificant trend of lower repeat dilation rates was present for the retrograde balloon pull-through group, with 4 of 22 in the retrograde balloon pull-through group versus 12 of 30 in the antegrade savary dilation group (P = .076). Only 1 minor adverse event occurred in the retrograde balloon pull-through group.

Conclusions

Our experience suggests that retrograde balloon pull-through dilation is effective and safe for simple and complex benign esophageal stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preliminary validation of the virtual bariatric endoscopic simulator Unexpected clipping failure of a full-thickness resection device during endoscopic full-thickness resection Transgastric biliary drainage through a biliodigestive efferent loop using a lumen-apposing metal stent Clinical safety of a novel over-the-scope gastroduodenal full-thickness resection device for the treatment of upper GI tract lesions: a multicenter experience Novel hemostatic adhesive powder to prevent delayed bleeding after endoscopic submucosal dissection in the GI tract: first U.S. multicenter experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1