{"title":"解读中国年轻学习者的语言学习动机:CLIL能改变现状吗?","authors":"Yan Zhu, Bo Peng, Dingfang Shu, Fangyuan Du","doi":"10.1111/ijal.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to compare the English language learning motivation of two cohorts of Chinese primary school learners in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and a non-CLIL instructional setting. A total of 270 learners from third, fourth and fifth grades in the CLIL programme (<i>N </i>= 184) and the non-CLIL programme (<i>N </i>= 86) participated in this study. Data were collected through a young learners’ L2 motivation questionnaire. Results indicated that CLIL learners overall displayed a significantly higher level of L2 motivation than their non-CLIL counterparts in the Ideal L2 Self domain and L2 Learning Experience. However, students in the non-CLIL programme overall rated themselves higher in the Ought-to L2 Self domain. When comparing L2 motivation levels between CLIL and non-CLIL sub-groups in different grades, we found that the non-CLIL subsamples’ mean motivational scores witnessed a continuous decline with the increase of grade in the scales of Ideal L2 Self, Ought-to L2 Self and Parental Expectations. Regarding Cultural Interest and L2 Learning Experience, CLIL students in both the fourth- and fifth-grade cohorts exhibited a significantly higher level of motivation than their non-CLIL peers. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the implementation of CLIL programme as a potential strategy to boost young learners’ motivation towards L2 learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46851,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"34 3","pages":"952-971"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unpacking Chinese young learners’ L2 learning motivation: Does CLIL make a difference?\",\"authors\":\"Yan Zhu, Bo Peng, Dingfang Shu, Fangyuan Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijal.12541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study aimed to compare the English language learning motivation of two cohorts of Chinese primary school learners in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and a non-CLIL instructional setting. A total of 270 learners from third, fourth and fifth grades in the CLIL programme (<i>N </i>= 184) and the non-CLIL programme (<i>N </i>= 86) participated in this study. Data were collected through a young learners’ L2 motivation questionnaire. Results indicated that CLIL learners overall displayed a significantly higher level of L2 motivation than their non-CLIL counterparts in the Ideal L2 Self domain and L2 Learning Experience. However, students in the non-CLIL programme overall rated themselves higher in the Ought-to L2 Self domain. When comparing L2 motivation levels between CLIL and non-CLIL sub-groups in different grades, we found that the non-CLIL subsamples’ mean motivational scores witnessed a continuous decline with the increase of grade in the scales of Ideal L2 Self, Ought-to L2 Self and Parental Expectations. Regarding Cultural Interest and L2 Learning Experience, CLIL students in both the fourth- and fifth-grade cohorts exhibited a significantly higher level of motivation than their non-CLIL peers. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the implementation of CLIL programme as a potential strategy to boost young learners’ motivation towards L2 learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"952-971\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12541\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijal.12541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unpacking Chinese young learners’ L2 learning motivation: Does CLIL make a difference?
This study aimed to compare the English language learning motivation of two cohorts of Chinese primary school learners in a Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) and a non-CLIL instructional setting. A total of 270 learners from third, fourth and fifth grades in the CLIL programme (N = 184) and the non-CLIL programme (N = 86) participated in this study. Data were collected through a young learners’ L2 motivation questionnaire. Results indicated that CLIL learners overall displayed a significantly higher level of L2 motivation than their non-CLIL counterparts in the Ideal L2 Self domain and L2 Learning Experience. However, students in the non-CLIL programme overall rated themselves higher in the Ought-to L2 Self domain. When comparing L2 motivation levels between CLIL and non-CLIL sub-groups in different grades, we found that the non-CLIL subsamples’ mean motivational scores witnessed a continuous decline with the increase of grade in the scales of Ideal L2 Self, Ought-to L2 Self and Parental Expectations. Regarding Cultural Interest and L2 Learning Experience, CLIL students in both the fourth- and fifth-grade cohorts exhibited a significantly higher level of motivation than their non-CLIL peers. This study provides empirical evidence supporting the implementation of CLIL programme as a potential strategy to boost young learners’ motivation towards L2 learning.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Linguistics (InJAL) publishes articles that explore the relationship between expertise in linguistics, broadly defined, and the everyday experience of language. Its scope is international in that it welcomes articles which show explicitly how local issues of language use or learning exemplify more global concerns.